Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Catholic School: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Walton One (talk | contribs) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. --'''[[User:Coredesat|Core]][[User talk:Coredesat|<span style="color:#3399FF;">desat</span>]]''' 03:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
===[[Trinity Catholic School]]===
:{{la|Trinity Catholic School}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Catholic School|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 January 27#{{anchorencode:Trinity Catholic School}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Subject of article does not meet notability requiremenst of [[WP:LOCAL]] [[User:Nv8200p|Nv8200p]] [[User_talk:Nv8200p|talk]] 13:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Line 6 ⟶ 13:
*'''Delete''', [[WP:SCHOOL]], [[WP:V]]. [[User:Terence Ong|Terence Ong]] 17:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - [[WP:SCHOOL]] is not actually a current policy (as it was not adopted). Although I agree that school articles ought to show evidence of notability, most schools do have their own articles at present, and it would seem unfair to deny an article to this one. And there's a substantial body of Wikipedians who argue that schools are inherently notable (although I'm not among them). [[User:Walton monarchist89|Walton monarchist89]] 19:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
**Looking at [[Wikipedia:Watch/schoolwatch/Schools_for_deletion_archive]], a number of school articles have been deleted due to failure of [[WP:N]]. Also, I have prodded a number of school articles whose deletions went through uncontested. If this school article is deleted, it won't be alone at all. (By the way, I doubt very much that most schools have their own articles.) [[User:Pan Dan|Pan Dan]] 20:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' because there is no sign of non-trivial external [[WP:N|coverage]] which we could use to write a Wikipedia article. Checked [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22trinity+catholic+school%22+lewiston&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 Google news archives] and even ''local'' papers in Lexis-Nexis. This is not a surprise though, because most schools wouldn't pass WP:N. [[User:Pan Dan|Pan Dan]] 20:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' If kept, should be moved to [[Trinity Catholic School (Lewiston)]] and the redirect either deleted or made into a disambiguation page, as there appear to be others. [[User:Pan Dan|Pan Dan]] 20:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above arguments to that effect. Non-notable. [[User:Soltak|Soltak]] | [[User_talk:Soltak|Talk]] 23:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. As usual, no evidence of notability. Just for once, give me a reason to keep a school article, please. It's not enough that the school exists and teaches students - all schools do that: just, please, show me a case where the school is actually doing something that distinguishes it from its peers ! ( Rant over. ) [[User:WMMartin|WMMartin]] 14:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per [[User:Pan Dan|Pan Dan]]. -- [[User:Butseriouslyfolks|Butseriouslyfolks]] 20:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' no notability, no sources, and if [[WP:SCHOOL]] were policy, it wouldn't meet it. <tt>[[User:Dismas|Dismas]]</tt>|[[User talk:Dismas|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 14:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||