Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments/CU/Courcelles: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 49:
:''Comments may also be submitted to the Arbitration Committee privately by emailing {{NoSpam|arbcom-en-b|lists.wikimedia.org}}''
*In my limited observations of Courcelles I have found him to be an articulate and good faith editor with the significant authorities that he has on WP, so I support him continuing in CU and OS. [[User:Pine|<
*Courcelles is a well seasoned member of the AUSC and I would fully support for turning in the audit flag (or keeping it for that matter) for the CU flag. -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<span style="color:green;">DQ</span>]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<span style="color:red;"> (t) </span>]] [[Special:EmailUser/DeltaQuad|<span style="color:blue;"> (e)</span>]] 17:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
*Courcelles strikes me as both neutral and transparent in their actions. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 12:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
| |||