Comparison of backup software: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:58, 17 September 2021

Latest revision as of 07:08, 14 May 2023

(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{short description|None}}

Feature '''comparison of backup software''' for a more general comparison see [[List of backup software]].

{{More citations needed|date=October 2022}}

Feature '''comparison of backup software'''. forFor a more general comparison see [[List of backup software]].

==OpenList Source==

{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: 100%; text-align: center; font-size: smaller; table-layout: fixed;"

! Package

! Network optimized (rsync)

Line 38 ⟶ 40:

![[Attic (backup software)|Attic]]

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}; [[Buzhash]] [[Rolling_hashRolling hash|chunking]]<ref name="attic-internals">{{cite web|last1=anarcat|title=document internals better|url=https://github.com/jborg/attic/pull/155/files|website=Github pull requests|accessdate=29 January 2015}}</ref>

| {{yes}}; [[Advanced Encryption Standard|AES]], [[SHA256]] [[HMAC]] with [[PBKDF2]] encrypted keyfiles<ref name="attic-internals" />

| {{yes}}; by MAC of plaintext and ciphertext

Line 49 ⟶ 51:

! [[BackupPC]]

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}; [[Hard_linkHard link|hard-links]]

| {{no}}; but can be achieved via pluggable transfer mechanism

| {{no}}

Line 71 ⟶ 73:

! [[Back in Time (Linux software)|Back In Time]]

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}; [[Hard_linkHard link|hard-links]]

| {{yes}}; [[EncFS]]

|

Line 93 ⟶ 95:

![[Borg (backup software)|Borg]]<br>(fork of Attic)

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}; [[Buzhash]] [[Rolling_hashRolling hash|chunking]]<ref name="attic-internals">{{cite web|last1=anarcat|title=document internals better|url=https://github.com/jborg/attic/pull/155/files|website=Github pull requests|accessdate=29 January 2015}}</ref>

| {{yes}}; [[Advanced Encryption Standard|AES]], [[SHA256]] [[HMAC]] with [[PBKDF2]] encrypted keyfiles<ref name="attic-internals" />

| {{yes}}; by MAC of plaintext and ciphertext

Line 170 ⟶ 172:

! [[DAR (Disk Archiver)|DAR]]

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}; [[Incremental backup#Incrementals forever|Incremental]]; [[Rolling_hashRolling hash|chunking]];

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

Line 201 ⟶ 203:

| {{no}}

|-

! [[Dump (programUnix)|dump]]

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

Line 287 ⟶ 289:

|

| {{dunno}}

| {{no}}

|-

! [[obnam]]

|

| {{yes}} chunk

| {{yes}}

|

|

|

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

|-

Line 324 ⟶ 315:

! [[rsync]]

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}; [[Hard_linkHard link|hard-links]] (--link-dest)

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

Line 343 ⟶ 334:

| {{dunno}}

| {{dunno}}

|-

! Zmanda Recovery Manager

|

| {{yes}}

| {{dunno}}

|

|

|

|

| {{dunno}}

| {{no}}

|-

! [[zsync]]

Line 363 ⟶ 343:

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yesno}}

|-

! [[obnamzpaq]]

| {{yes}} chunk

| {{yes}}; [[Incremental backup|Incremental]]

| {{yes}}; [[Advanced Encryption Standard|AES-256/CTR]]

| {{yes}}; [[SHA-1]]

| {{yesno}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}; through deduplication

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

Line 370 ⟶ 361:

{{Reflist}}

== External links ==

* [http://www.si-journal.org/index.php/JSI/article/view/205 Performance comparison of five remote incremental backup tools: Rsync, Rdiff-backup, Duplicity, Areca and Link-Backup]

[[Category:Backup software|*]]