Content deleted Content added
→Talk header test response: We should move this discussion somewhere, before the page gets deleted. |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 28:
[[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]], this looks good to me! Ideally, in the final implementation, both boxes would be similarly formatted with or without an icon. [[Medtronic]] is a real-world example if you're still looking for a live page to test. - [[User:Wikmoz|Wikmoz]] ([[User talk:Wikmoz|talk]]) 16:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
: {{re|Wikmoz}}, good point. We should probably copy & move this discussion somewhere, as this is a talk subpage that is only temporary, and subject to deletion at any time. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 03:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
:: {{re|Mathglot}}... Feel free to delete. Would it be possible to do a trial rollout of the initial solution so we can start kicking the tires in the real world? We had consensus to move forward. We could then use [[Medtronic]] to test the stacked RS link sets. I can kick off a conversation on a template talk page to discuss the approach. - [[User:Wikmoz|Wikmoz]] ([[User talk:Wikmoz|talk]]) 04:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
::: {{re|Wikmoz}}, yes, soon; I'm still in jet-lag after a trip, will want to be fully alert for this. For the record, I assume you're referring to [[Module talk:Find sources#Multiple RS link sets in a single topic]]. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 16:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
:::: {{re|Mathglot}}, yes. That's the one. - [[User:Wikmoz|Wikmoz]] ([[User talk:Wikmoz|talk]]) 22:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
| |||