Revision as of 16:25, 22 September 2021 edit Mathglot (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 92,928 edits →Talk header test response: Related discussion here, I assume. ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 22:30, 22 September 2021 edit undo Wikmoz (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,262 edits →Talk header test response: Yes.
Line 30: :: {{re\|Mathglot}}... Feel free to delete. Would it be possible to do a trial rollout of the initial solution so we can start kicking the tires in the real world? We had consensus to move forward. We could then use [[Medtronic]] to test the stacked RS link sets. I can kick off a conversation on a template talk page to discuss the approach. - [[User:Wikmoz\|Wikmoz]] ([[User talk:Wikmoz\|talk]]) 04:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC) ::: {{re\|Wikmoz}}, yes, soon; I'm still in jet-lag after a trip, will want to be fully alert for this. For the record, I assume you're referring to [[Module talk:Find sources#Multiple RS link sets in a single topic]]. [[User:Mathglot\|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot\|talk]]) 16:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC) :::: {{re\|Mathglot}}, yes. That's the one. - [[User:Wikmoz\|Wikmoz]] ([[User talk:Wikmoz\|talk]]) 22:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Cochlear Limited/Talk header test: Difference between revisions