Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
Plastikspork (talk | contribs) m Remove page from Special:WantedTemplates |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 8:
I thought this padding issue had been resolved? [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 00:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
:Me too, but then again I use a proper browser <
::Looks better. Cheers! [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 12:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 16:
:Looks pretty good! But the colour of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Merseyside/Collaboration]] link suggests to me that you are not using this collaboration of the month thing, so maybe these should be fixed or removed? Ditto for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Merseyside/Merging]]. As you are using so many of the extended quality classes, I might suggest that it would be simpler to use them all and do away with the custom class that you have created. Regards, [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 23:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
::I dunno, I'd prefer to keep things as they are in the current template - they can always be dealt with later. This is still a relatively new WikiProject after all. :) Since everything seems to be in order I'm going to go ahead with the switch. Cheers! [[User:Small-town hero|Small-town hero]] ([[User talk:Small-town hero|talk]]) 01:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
== Another Padding Comment ==
{{#invoke:WikiProject banner|main
|PROJECT = Tulips
|category=no
Line 26 ⟶ 27:
|IMAGE_RIGHT = Tulipa suaveolens floriade to Canberra.jpg
|IMAGE_RIGHT_LARGE = 50px
|MAIN_TEXT = <div style="text-align: center;">'''WPBannerMeta'''</
}}
{{Tmbox
|image = [[Image:Tulipa suaveolens floriade to Canberra.jpg|50px]]
|imageright = [[Image:Tulipa suaveolens floriade to Canberra.jpg|50px]]
|text = <div style="text-align: center;">'''Tmbox'''</
}}
{{#invoke:WikiProject banner|main
|PROJECT = Tulips
|category=no
Line 43 ⟶ 44:
|IMAGE_RIGHT = Tulipa suaveolens floriade to Canberra.jpg
|IMAGE_RIGHT_SMALL = 30px
|MAIN_TEXT = <div style="text-align: center;">'''WPBannerMeta'''</
}}
{{Tmbox
Line 49 ⟶ 50:
|image = [[Image:Tulipa suaveolens floriade to Canberra.jpg|30px]]
|imageright = [[Image:Tulipa suaveolens floriade to Canberra.jpg|30px]]
|text = <div style="text-align: center;">'''Tmbox'''</
}}
Line 76 ⟶ 77:
:::There's a {{para|HOOK_NOTE}} parameter which can be used to add further notes. See example below: -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 13:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
<pre>
{{#invoke:WikiProject banner|main
|PROJECT = Tulips
|small = {{{small|}}}
Line 159 ⟶ 160:
:::::Yes, that looks good. Parameter ''names'' are case-sensitive, although the parameter ''values'' are not. [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 17:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
::::::Huh? That doesn't sound right. Parameter values ''are'' case-sensitive, otherwise we wouldn't need to use constructs such as <nowiki>{{lc:{{{class}}} }}</nowiki>. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 10:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Sorry, I meant that parameter values are case-insensitive ''because'' we use the lc: construct everywhere <
{{done}}. All banners using the checklist have been fixed, and the documentation has been updated to prevent this problem in the future. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 16:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 165 ⟶ 166:
Would it be possible for class=Image to also recognize class=File after our namespace change? Just a thought. [[User:Stepshep|<span style="color:green; font-family:Comic Sans MS;">§hep</span>]] • [[User talk:Stepshep|<span style="color:green; font-family:Comic Sans MS;">¡Talk to me!</span>]] 22:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
:Yes <
::Thanks. [[User:Stepshep|<span style="color:green; font-family:Comic Sans MS;">§hep</span>]] • [[User talk:Stepshep|<span style="color:green; font-family:Comic Sans MS;">¡Talk to me!</span>]] 23:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
== <nowiki>listas={{{listas|}}}</nowiki> ==
It says in the template doc that <nowiki>listas={{{listas|}}}</nowiki> is required for the template to work. I was wondering if this changes means that {{tl|OH-Project}} needs updated to include this? Is this a recent thing? I don't remember it always being required or even existent. [[User:Stepshep|<span style="color:green; font-family:Comic Sans MS;">§hep</span>]] • [[User talk:Stepshep|<span style="color:green; font-family:Comic Sans MS;">¡Talk to me!</span>]] 19:59, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
:This functionality should really be included in all banners, notwithstanding the fact that it is currently broken <
::If you could include it that'd be great and I'd be more than happy to doc it. I just can't touch the template in its current state... Thanks. [[User:Stepshep|<span style="color:green; font-family:Comic Sans MS;">§hep</span>]] • [[User talk:Stepshep|<span style="color:green; font-family:Comic Sans MS;">¡Talk to me!</span>]] 21:06, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
:::{{done}} [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 21:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Line 184 ⟶ 185:
On the to-do list, there is '''check listas functionality'''.
It looks to me as it's not quite doing which it should be. Although there is some code in WPBannerMeta/core which does <
}}</nowiki>'''</
I think if <
}}</nowiki></
Would that be better?
Line 196 ⟶ 197:
:The todo should probably be "''fix'' listas functionality", it is currently as you say completely broken. I'm actually waiting for {{phab|18552}}, which will make the whole issue a hell of a lot easier (we'd just need to remove the sortkeys altogether). The solution you propose would fix the problem, but it would require passing parameters around that will become superfluous in the (hopefully) near future. I can 'fix' it if there's a pressing need for it, but I'm not aware of many projects that actively use this feature at the moment... [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 20:04, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
::No pressing need, although if you moved the <
:::On the contrary, you'd have to pass 'listas', defaulting to <
::::I'm meaning after {{phab|18552}} is fixed. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 19:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::Ah, I see. Then yes, as you say, after the bug is fixed it will be very easy; move the listas code as you say, and remove all the sorkeys from all the subtemplates. [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 20:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 221 ⟶ 222:
::::Done, enjoy [[:Category:WPBannerMeta banners using collapsed text]]. They're sorted by namespace. [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 11:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Just remove <
:But then it won't collapse inside banner shells. Kind of throwing the baby out with the bathwater <
== WPMIX ==
Line 256 ⟶ 257:
::::You've gone and used {{tl|WPBannerMeta/qualityscale}} in WPBeatles. So do we actually need either hook? -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 12:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::Argh! On a pure technical level, no we don't, in the same way we don't ''need'' /hooks/notes or /hooks/taskforces. They're just wrappers for the internal templates. But they're wrappers that we need, because otherwise if we change the way things feed into the internal subtemplates, we have to update every banner that calls the subtemplates directly. If there's a complete and consistent 'shell' around the 'core' functions, we only need to ensure that the two interface ''with each other'' properly, and don't have to go hunting all over wikipedia to find the wierd and wonderful ways people have used the core templates directly. So while they might just be wrappers at the moment, it's still important to have them, and use them. So I've updated WPBeatles, and fixed the /hooks/qualitycats documentation that prompted me to use the internal template in the first place <
No, I don't mind. It's good to be clean. A problem with the Beatles template, as I noted [[Template_talk:WPBeatles#Quality_and_importance_scales|here]] last year is that FQS is selectively used. I don't think you have sorted this problem yet. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 13:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 268 ⟶ 269:
{{tlx|WP Crime|category=no}}
:That was quick! [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 13:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
::I'm bored <
== WPBannerMeta/hooks/priorityscale ==
Line 325 ⟶ 326:
== Documentation and To-Do Lists ==
Someone might want to change the Documentation from showing to-do lists as to be done with <
:Hi, I've changed the docs for that section a bit & added a note about the hook for todo lists. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 07:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 335 ⟶ 336:
</pre>
thanks -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 12:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
:I know, why don't we add tracking categories to monitor ''every'' parameter... <
What's the rationale behind all this converting of collapsed things into hooks? [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 13:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 366 ⟶ 367:
<table class="collapsible" style="background:transparent" width="100%">
<tr><th style="background:#F8EABA; text-align:left; padding:0px;">'''Comments:''' <sup class=plainlinks>[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments|action=edit}} edit] {{·}} [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments|action=history}} history] {{·}} [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments|action=watch}} watch] {{·}} [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=purge}} purge]</sup></th></tr>
<tr><td style="text-align:left; padding:0px; background-color:white; border:1px solid #c0c090; padding:5px; margin-top:5px;">{{ {{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments}}</td>
</tr></table>
Line 372 ⟶ 373:
<table class="collapsible" style="background:transparent" width="100%">
<tr><th style="background:#F8EABA; text-align:left; padding:0px;">'''Comments:'''</th></tr>
<tr><td style="text-align:left; padding:0px; background-color:white; border:1px solid #c0c090; padding:5px; margin-top:5px;"><sup class=plainlinks><div style="text-align: center;">[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments|action=edit}} edit]{{·}} [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments|action=history}} history]{{·}} [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments|action=watch}} watch]{{·}} [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=purge}} purge]</
</tr></table>
Line 407 ⟶ 408:
Unrelated error: AUTO_ASSESS_CAT is passed to core, but is not used. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 15:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
::Needed a general overhaul <
:::Excellent. You're on form today. Umm, request two headers up? [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 16:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
:::Oh, and is there any advantage in being able to specify NO auto-assess category? For example COMMENTS_CAT=none allows that. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 16:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
::::That's on the todo list somewhere... during the next blue-moon season... <
== Chemical Element ==
I'm working on getting {{tlx|Chemical Element}} to use WPBannerMeta at [[User:Peachey88/Sandbox/016]] but i don't think it's possible because it sticks the articles in multiple categories based on its rating, for example a FA class article would be in the following categories ''<
This should help:
Line 451 ⟶ 452:
'''Current'''
{{#invoke:WikiProject banner|main
|PROJECT = Tulips
|small = {{{small|}}}
Line 459 ⟶ 460:
|IMAGE_LEFT = Tulipa suaveolens floriade to Canberra.jpg
|IMAGE_LEFT_LARGE = 50px
|HOOK_BOTTOM =
}}
'''Sandbox'''
{{
|PROJECT = Tulips
|small = {{{small|}}}
Line 473 ⟶ 471:
|IMAGE_LEFT = Tulipa suaveolens floriade to Canberra.jpg
|IMAGE_LEFT_LARGE = 50px
|HOOK_BOTTOM =
}}
Line 482 ⟶ 477:
:This looks promising. The bottom version does look okay. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 15:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
::Finally! The sandbox version works great! This has been bugging me almost since this template hit the market it seems. [[User:Stepshep|<
Seems our spiritual leader is not around today. WOS, if you are confident that this will work then you could put an editprotected up. Apart from it looking fine on both browsers I have access to, I don't know enough about it to comment further. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 20:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 500 ⟶ 495:
:::::True... well {{fixed}} in {{tlx|td}}, so hopefully the live template is sorted. [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 00:25, 18 January 2009 (UTC)::::
::::::All looking good from this end. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 11:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Looks good here too. [[User:Stepshep|<
== Comments' <code>colspan</code> ==
Line 512 ⟶ 507:
Suggestion: I've been thinking about creating a subpage for bug reports. Non-controversial things which otherwise clog up this discussion page. Thoughts? [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 17:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
:There isn't really much that goes on on this page that ''aren't'' bug reports <
::I'd be more in favour of slowing the bot down actually! There is a discussion near the top of the page which hasn't reached a conclusion yet (I added an edit the other day to stop it being archived). There are some little things I find (e.g. small non-urgent errors) which don't need the attention of this page. But let's leave for now then. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 21:54, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
== More on priority vs importance and hooks ==
Line 562 ⟶ 557:
</pre>
then, to use it, all that would be required is <
-- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 20:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
:Looks good. Would be good to support Priority with a capital P because I've come across that before. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 21:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
::Priority with a capital P can be supported in the Project Banner with <
:::You misunderstand. I saw a project (can't remember which now) which used, e.g. Low-Priority xxx articles, rather than Low-priority xxx articles. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 22:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
::::I saw one project something similar for [[:Category:Evanescence articles by importance|Importance]] recently, so I've just put in a request for a [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy|speedy rename]] after I'd converted the banner. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 22:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 575 ⟶ 570:
Question: should the class parameter be sent to hooks premasked, or should the hook pass it through the mask? It seems to me that the former is less user-friendly but is more efficient and also allows for custom masks to be used. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 21:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
:Hooks should be responsible for ensuring that all parameters are handled as they would be in the template itself. So hooks should assume that all parameters are being sent in un-normalised, in shorthand notation, and using inverted camelcase <
::Hmmm, if you look at my [[Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/qualimpintersect|category intersection]] hook, it would be necessary to call that mask three times! That's terrible efficiency ... [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 23:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
:::You might have to do qualimpintersect & qualimpintersect/core if you want to process it only once. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 00:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
::::That's certainly one solution; it's worked for the main banner <
:::::You could also get them to show on the template page as well then which would be good. - [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 07:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Oh, you two are good. Why didn't I think of that? I'll put my hook into a core straightaway. WOS, is there a way to do the templatepage stuff without affecting performance? I worry about having all the extra code on the hook. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 13:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
:[[WP:PERFORMANCE|Don't panic]] <
::Ah, Happy-melon's favourite essay :P [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 14:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
:::Actually my favourite essay is [[WP:SENSE]], although it doesn't actually say what most people think it does. I actually care more about performance than [[WP:PERFORMANCE]] really condones. [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 14:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 590 ⟶ 585:
How about putting the templates that are in /sandbox pages into a separate category, [[:Category:WikiProject banners under development]] say, instead of putting them into either of the two main categories. Could also do the same for any versions in the User space as well. What do you think? -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 22:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
:Good idea, but I'm not sure how you detect whether a page is in a /sandbox. Maybe the titleparts parser function? [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 22:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
::<
:::I've created that cat & it is now populated. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 23:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
::::Wow, great! [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 23:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 600 ⟶ 595:
:::Surely you can just set {{para|BANNER_NAME|Template:WPAFC}} and it will function normally, albeit by a somewhat counterintuitive method? [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 22:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
::::No, because it's looking for the custom mask in the wrong place! [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 22:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::OH. <
::::::You should move it to {{tl|WPAFC administration}} (or something similar) and the redirect link would still be there. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 23:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::::I suppose I could ... but would it not be possible to interpret either the actual page name ''or'' the base page as the templatepage? [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 21:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 616 ⟶ 611:
:It's not possible to change the image when the collapsible section is opened. [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 23:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
::Might have to purge your cache, but the background is gone. This might be my lucky day after all. I've been without InkScape for..geez, verging on two monthsish? Anyways, it's working now. [[User:Stepshep|<
:::Great! Well done. Can we implement please? [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 21:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
::::{{done}} Looks great! [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 22:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 632 ⟶ 627:
::::On my screen it ''does'' take up just one line, although the row is slightly taller than the others thanks to the image. What screen resolution are you using? Or have I misunderstood you entirely? [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 23:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::On mt screen, the cell is twice the height as the C-class box above it. Resolution currently 1280x800. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 23:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
::::::Appears to be double the class template size for me to; I also noticed on this particular banner the first [Show] is cut off. ([[:File:BannerMeta B-Class.png|Screenshot]]) Vista/IE7 1440x900 [[User:Stepshep|<
It's not this particular banner. It seems to be on all those that use the B-class checklist. I can see it happening on, e.g. {{tl|WikiProject Iran}} and {{tl|WikiProject Nevada}} as well. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 08:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
<syntaxhighlight lang=wikitext>
{{WPBannerMeta/test|class=C|b1=yes|b2=no|b3=|cleanup=yes|~IMG_SIZE=30px|category=no}}
{{WPBannerMeta/test|class=C|b1=yes|b2=no|b3=|cleanup=yes|~IMG_SIZE=25px|category=no}}
{{WPBannerMeta/test|class=C|b1=yes|b2=no|b3=|cleanup=yes|~IMG_SIZE=20px|category=no}}
{{WPBannerMeta/test|class=C|b1=yes|b2=no|b3=|cleanup=yes|~IMG_SIZE=15px|category=no}}
</syntaxhighlight>
Here are a few different sizes of image. Which one is preferred? <s>I would also quite like to find a way of centering the "B" within the box, but we can play with that once we have a good size.</s> Preferences? [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 12:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
:Third one down? [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 14:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
::Could we have one where the [Show] for the checklist isn't cutoff? [[User:Stepshep|<
:::We could, yes, but it's so much cooler to only show the "sh", don't you think? <
::::Hehe, 3rd one down. [[User:Stepshep|<
:::::I think I've now fixed the cutting-off issue. Does it look ok in all your browsers? [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 21:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
::::::Looks great. 01:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 666 ⟶ 662:
== Peer Review ==
I've been through the list of banners using the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&target=Template%3AWPBannerMeta%2Fhooks%2Fpeerreview&namespace=10 peerreview hook], to add the <
However, it looks like a large number of them don't actually use the peer review system as they just have a red link to a peer review page:
Line 711 ⟶ 707:
Would it be possible to add a hook for a B-Class check-list, like on the [[WP:MILHIST]] banners? That looks useful, and could come in handy. I can't code hooks, so I can't do it myself. '''[[User:Dendodge|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Den</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:red">dodge</em>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Dendodge|Talk]]</small><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Dendodge|Contribs]]</sup> 12:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
:How about {{para|B_CHECKLIST|yes}} <
{{
|category=no|small=yes
|class=B
Line 730 ⟶ 726:
:I'm sure that's possible, but if you're complaining about how text gets squashed up, try adding <code><nowiki>{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|{{-}}|}}</nowiki></code> to the top of the main banner text. That fixes it (I know because I did it to {{tl|WPBeatles}}). '''[[User:Dendodge|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Den</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:red">dodge</em>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Dendodge|Talk]]</small><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Dendodge|Contribs]]</sup> 19:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
::Not to worry, an #ifeq: parser function did the trick. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 19:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
:::Nooooo! {{done}} in /core, no need for scary hacks like that <
::::Many thanks! [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 23:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Line 789 ⟶ 785:
[[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 09:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
:1, I'm pretty sure, depends on the job que. You can get such things to update quicker by null editing the pages that need updated. While useful for the task, bots should ''never'' be used for such a task[[User:ShepBot|.]] <
:2, I created the [[Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/collaboration|collaboration hook]], mainly by ripping the (excellent) code from the peer review hook :) [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 15:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Line 873 ⟶ 869:
== More taskforces? ==
An chance someone could modify this to support more taskforces? Perhaps up to 20? ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<
:Please see [[Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/taskforces]]. You can add as many as you like, in multiples of 10. Let me know if you need help setting these up. [[User:Msgj|Martin]]<sup>[[User talk:Msgj|msgj]]</sup> 07:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
::Thanks. I'm looking to rework {{tl|WPJ}} to make it more flexible for expansion and such. This might allow that to work. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<
| |||