Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Very high-level programming language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
closing debate |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 12:
**well show me some examples that are very high programming languages. i would be happy to use them <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:The P++ Man|The P++ Man]] ([[User talk:The P++ Man|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/The P++ Man|contribs]]) 20:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
***To quote the article itself "A good example of a very high-level programming language is [[Logo]]". BDL (see {{doi|10.1145/359863.359886}}) also. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] 20:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as per DMacks [[User:
*'''Strong keep''', not keen on the phrasing of the AFD, but VHLL exists alright. As per DMacks, check out [[Logo]], and ISBN 0070350981 is a tidy book on the subject. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] 21:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Strong keep''', please search when you are unfamiliar with a topic. [[Scheme (programming language)]] is another example. But arguably so is [[C shell|csh]]. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 21:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Line 19:
*'''Strong Keep''' More examples: [[SETL]] and [[ProSet]]. Google Books is ''awash'' with references on this topic [http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Very+High+Level+Languages%22&btnG=Search+Books&as_brr=0], it's a shame the nominator didn't do a little basic research before declaring a notable topic "blatant bullshit". If you disagree with one statement, then remove it or request a citation. As it happens, you're wrong - there is no reason why parsable natural language syntax cannot be used as as a programming language with a clever enough compiler or interpreter. --[[User:Canley|Canley]] 05:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
*Obvious '''keep'''. You can't say that VHLL don't exist or aren't notable when the ACM has a symposium on them!--[[User:OinkOink|OinkOink]] 06:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||