Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 105: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Dreamy Jazz (talk | contribs) create |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 657:
=== Statement by Nableezy ===
The rule itself is not a bad idea, it's just worded terribly. Just change it to the following and all the confusion about what ''original editor'' means goes away:<blockquote>Editors may not re-revert a revert of their edit for at least 24 hours from the initial revert of their edit.</blockquote>You go back to the original 1RR you go back to the situation where somebody is able to force their edit in based off edit->revert->re-revert (that being the first revert by the initial editor). <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<
:Yes I see that is a bit ''how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck would chuck wood''-ish, but I think we all would understand it. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<
=== Statement by EdJohnston ===
Line 828:
;Administrators encouraged
:Administrators enforcing arbitration remedies in this topic area are encouraged to make use of appropriate discretionary sanctions to prevent or end prolonged or low-speed edit wars, even when the general 1RR prohibition has not been violated by any involved editor.}}
:
:'''Enacted:''' '''[[User:L235|Kevin]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·'''  [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·'''  [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 06:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
==== Support ====
Line 1,055:
(The "third admin" was AGK who weighed in after the case was closed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=860157521&oldid=859896988], and after Drmies reopened it, banned me indefinitely from all GMO-related pages. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petrarchan47&diff=860296334&oldid=860204712])
:{{reply|Serial Number 54129}} I have struck mention of [[WP:ADMINACCT]] as unnecessary. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">[[User:Petrarchan47|<
{{reply|Worm That Turned}}
Line 1,064:
*I am not precluding other issues being considered, such as the severity of AGK's determination.
''Note: There has been considerable activity in my case over the last 24 hours. I would appreciate if you wait to close this case until I have responded further.'' '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">[[User:Petrarchan47|<
=== Statement by Drmies ===
|