Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:52, 23 January 2022

Latest revision as of 00:54, 4 July 2024

(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{notice|header=This case is now closed and pages relating to it may no longer be watched|

{{casenav}}

*To request an amendment or clarification of an arbitration decision, see [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment]].

*To report a violation of an arbitration decision, see [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement]].

*To request the assistance of an arbitration clerk, see [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks]].}}{{Casenav|case name=Skepticism and coordinated editing|clerk1=Dreamy Jazz|clerk2=Amortias|clerk3=MJL|draft arb=Barkeep49|draft arb2=Izno|draft arb3=L235|draft arb4=|active=12|inactive=3|recused=0||scope=Editing behavior and potential coordinated editing in skepticism topics}}

== Clarification on the scope ==

Line 144 ⟶ 147:

:I hope that sufficiently answers questions of scope. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

::Very clear, and answered all of my questions. Thanks! --[[User:Guy Macon Alternate Account|Guy Macon Alternate Account]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon Alternate Account|talk]]) 19:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

== L235 added as a drafter ==

Just wanted to formally announced that {{u|L235}} has joined {{u|Izno}} and I as a drafter for this case. Best, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 21:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

== PD extended one week ==

Hi all. Due to the press of business, the drafters are extending the estimate for the posting of our proposed decision in this case by one week. For the Committee, '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 03:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

== Added principles of this case ==

Just as a note, I have added the principles from this case to [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Principles]]. Feel free to edit the index to correct any errors I may have put accidentally. Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/2601:647:5800:1A1F:20EC:5F67:ED8B:DBEC|2601:647:5800:1A1F:20EC:5F67:ED8B:DBEC]] ([[User talk:2601:647:5800:1A1F:20EC:5F67:ED8B:DBEC|talk]]) 05:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

== Block of Rp2006 ==

:'''[[Special:Permalink/1230295221#Block of Rp2006|Original discussion]]'''

{{atop|1=Motion adopted. - [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 21:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)}}

{{ivmbox|The Arbitration Committee assumes the block of {{user|Rp2006}}.}}

'''Enacted''' - [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 21:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

{{ACMajority|active=10|motion=yes}}

'''Support:'''

#A [[Special:Diff/1229647244&oldid=1229611424|consensus of uninvolved administrators at AE]] recently decided to block Rp2006 for violations of their topic ban coming immediately after the expiration of ArbCom's 1 month block of them. This is an indefinite block, with the first year being Arbitration Enforcement. Given the private evidence we have, I think it makes sense for ArbCom to assume responsibility for this block. I also would like to see extra scrutiny applied to any unblock request rather than having it go through the typical process if Rp2006 were to apply after a year when the AE part of the block expires. {{u|Seraphimblade}}, the blocking administrator (acting on the AE consensus), has [[Special:Diff/1229662830|no objections]] to us doing this. [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 14:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

# my personal preference would be to call this a ban and let them appeal in 12 months, but this works too --[[User:Guerillero|Guerillero]] ^{[[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color: green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]} 17:02, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

# [[User:ToBeFree|&#126; ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 18:50, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

# Given that there is private information that should be considered when addressing any future unblock requests. - [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 13:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

# [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 17:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

# [[User:Cabayi|Cabayi]] ([[User talk:Cabayi|talk]]) 08:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

'''Oppose:'''

#

'''Abstain:'''

#

=== Arbitrator views and discussions ===

=== Community discussion ===

As a note, if this passes I'll tack it onto the remedies list for [[WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing|SCE]] in my notes as the previous block against Rp2006 was also under that case and based on what I can grok from the AE thread this block was levied for pretty much the same reasons as the previous. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] ^{<small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small>} 18:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

{{abot}}