Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automated Imaging Microscope System: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12)
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 39:
:*'''Comment''' Many of the above "publications" are in fact only meeting abstracts (often not peer reviewed). The others are articles that have not or only sporadically been cited, not showing any notability for this system. If I search for "Automated Imaging Microscope System (AIMS)" on Google, I get 25 hits, not 2450. --[[User:Crusio|Crusio]] ([[User talk:Crusio|talk]]) 11:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
*'''KEEP''' [User:JohnEisen|JohnEisen]] ([[User talk:JohnEisens|talk]]) 2:20, 1 May 2010 (UTC) '''Note''': This comment was added by [[User:12.149.202.41]]. [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 02:36, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
:*The above "JohnEisen" account does not exist. Consider it a vote by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Automated_Imaging_Microscope_System&diff=359370408&oldid=359360163 this IP]. '''[[User:JamieS93|<fontspan style="color:#FF66CC;">Jamie</fontspan>]][[User talk:JamieS93|<fontspan style="color:#FF1493;">S93</fontspan>]]'''<sup>❤</sup> 12:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
::*'''Comment''' [[User:12.149.202.41]] has been reported as a possible [[sockpuppet]], see [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sgaran]]. --<span style="text-shadow:#DDDDDD 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Nuujinn|Nuujinn]] ([[User talk:Nuujinn|talk]])</span> 12:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - Dear wikipedia colleagues, I would like to update you on a issue that has become disturbing to me. A few days ago Wim Crusio and I had a disagreement over the word "Phenomics" which has been used in many scientific publications and online dictionaries. Wim Crusio has been changing the wiki entry to re-direct it to the word "Phenotype" and I have tried to keep the word as a stand alone term. After his repeated failed attempts to redirect the word to "Phenotype" he has decided to carry out a reprehensible vendetta against myself, my work and my co-researcher who passed away in 2008. As you can see by Wim Crusio's edit history on the following items, he started to delete and alter the following items, on April 29, 2010, which was directly after our disagreement over the word "Phenomics" :
Line 58:
*'''Merge into [[microscope image processing]] or [[Automated tissue image systems]]''' Even with the article in the Linux Journal, the specific installation at Berkeley described in this article doesn't seem to be notable. The developments in microscopy do seem significant, but belong in a more general article. The author should be encouraged to read [[WP:FAQ/Organizations]]. -- [[User:Radagast3|Radagast]][[Special:Contributions/Radagast3|<big><span style="color:green">3</span></big>]] ([[User talk:Radagast3|talk]]) 00:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. There are only 9 hits in Google scholar and they seem to all be primary sources (by people affiliated with the project). That includes the ''Linux J.'' piece cited by Colonel Warden: it's by two project affiliates. The absence of third-party reliable sources prevents us from writing a neutral encyclopedia article about this subject, and is also a strong hint that this subject does not have enough of a broader significance to warrant including. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 03:32, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. The sources claimed above are all [[primary source|primary]], and are not independent. Google searching returns only [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&as_q=&as_epq=Automated+Imaging+Microscope+System&as_oq=&as_eq=wikipedia&num=100&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=all&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=off 37 results.] <fontspan facestyle="font-family:Cambria;">[[User:Abductive|<fontspan colorstyle="color:teal;">'''Abductive'''</fontspan>]] ([[User talk:Abductive|reasoning]])</fontspan> 19:35, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''- No independant coverage as per User Dave Epstein and the nominators comments. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 03:00, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>