Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Wrightflyer.jpg: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Chick Bowen (talk | contribs) list for delisting |
closed |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 5:
;Nominator: [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]]
* '''
* '''Comment''' From the source: "There are no known restrictions on the photographs taken by the Wright Brothers. Privacy and publicity rights may apply." [[User:HighInBC|HighInBC]]<small> <sup>(Need help? [[User_talk:HighInBC|Ask me]])</sup></small> 23:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
**This photograph was donated to the LOC along with the Wright brothers' personal collection. But it was not taken by the Wright brothers; it was taken by Mr. Daniels. [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 23:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
***It says "Attributed to Wilbur and/or Orville Wright.", it could be Mr. Daniels was in their employ at the time. It also says "Orville Wright preset the camera and had John T. Daniels squeeze the rubber bulb, tripping the shutter.", it seems Mr. Daniels was an assistant. [[User:HighInBC|HighInBC]]<small> <sup>(Need help? [[User_talk:HighInBC|Ask me]])</sup></small> 23:24, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
****I trust that the LOC isn't going to miss something as obvious as 70 years pma. If Daniels was an assistant, then it's likely a work-for-hire and he wouldn't own the copyright. I don't see why we can't trust the "No known restrictions" bit. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C;">howcheng</span>]]''' <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 23:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
*****What tag should we put on it in that case? The current one there is deprecated. Perhaps {{tl|pd-because}}, with an explanation? [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 00:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
******I've done that before: <nowiki>{{PD-because|the Library of Congress says it is.}}</nowiki> <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C;">howcheng</span>]]''' <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 07:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
*****Well, if someone else could put a statement together I'd appreciate that. I'm still not fully comfortable with ''declaring it to be public ___domain'', when the reality is only that no rights-holder has placed restrictions on use. [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 21:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Well said Howcheng. [[User:HighInBC|HighInBC]]<small> <sup>(Need help? [[User_talk:HighInBC|Ask me]])</sup></small> 23:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The LoC is our reliable source on intellectual property. Speculation doesn't trump their assessment. ~ [[User:Trialsanderrors|trialsanderrors]] 21:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. If LoC says it's free, let's leave it at that. --[[User:Janke|Janke]] | [[User talk:Janke|Talk]] 08:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
{{FPCresult|Kept|}} [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 08:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
{{-}}
|