Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vue.js: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. [[User talk:Becky Sayles|'''<span style="color:#0092d6; background:#bae9ff"><sup> B </sup><small>E </small><sub>C </sub><small>K </small><sup>Y </sup> <sub>S </sub><small>A </small><sup>Y L </sup><small>E </small><sub>S </sub></span>''']] 09:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)</small>
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<
*'''Redirect''' to [[JavaScript templating]], where it is mentioned. I found two InfoWorld articles [http://www.infoworld.com/article/2998995/javascript/for-vuejs-components-power-interactive-web-interfaces.html],[http://www.infoworld.com/article/3063615/javascript/vuejs-lead-our-javascript-framework-is-faster-than-react.html], but both have a lot of quoting of primary sources and not much secondary commentary.--RS, but not in quite enough depth. The download stats are an assertion of significance sufficient to avoid a speedy deletion and perhaps enough to cast doubt on a prod, but not enough for notability, because you can't build an article on a download stat. I don't see any good merge target. A redirect to [[JavaScript templating]] would be reasonable, but a merge would be unbalance the article. VueJS or vue.js are reasonable search terms, so a redirect could be justified. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 21:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' and then Redirect instead as my own searches have found not found substantially better, this can be redirected however since it's connected. [[User:SwisterTwister|<
*'''Redirect''' to [[JavaScript templating]] per {{u|Mark viking}} above and also because it's a valid search term. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|