Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Context hacking: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 10:
:{{la|Context hacking}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Context hacking|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 December 30#{{anchorencode:Context hacking}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:({{Find sources|Context hacking}})
Blatant copy-violation of [http://monochrom.at/blog/index.php?op=Default&Date=201012&blogId=2 this page]. The page was tagged by a bot, but the creator simply removed the tag. Furthermore, this is a neologism not in wide use, which is probably why there is one source whose words are quoted verbatim with no context. <
*'''Delete''' - Agree with the above. Googling the term pulls up no usage besides a few random websites. Cheers! -- [[User:Lord Roem|Lord Roem]] ([[User talk:Lord Roem|talk]]) 05:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above, have tagged and blanked as a copyvio. [[User:Acather96|Acather96]] ([[User talk:Acather96|talk]]) 08:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
|