Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formula One (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:59, 14 February 2022

Latest revision as of 03:26, 27 December 2024

Line 21:

:: However that's not what was suggested - a merge to [[Constraint logic programming]] seems entirely appropriate. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 11:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

* <strikes> '''Merge'''</strikes>(see below) (although I'd prefer to '''keep''' it) No, I can't source it immediately. Like msnicki's other AfD for [[Qi (programming language)]], these are articles that illustrate why language designers need to choose [[googlewhack]]s for their names, if they're to survive on WP. This is a good article and is illustrative of the general field of [[Constraint logic programming]]. Accordingly if we aren't going to keep it for reasons of demonstrated notability, we should at least improve the encyclopedia by merging this useful topic explanation into our general article. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 11:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

**I can agree with that provided that you commit to (1) ensuring that the merge actually happens, while (2) including similar attention to other multi-paradigm languages that combine CP and LP, such as [[Alma-0]], [[ECLiPSe]], [[B-Prolog]], [[CHIP (programming language)|CHIP]], [[CLP(R)]], [[Oz (programming language)|Oz]], and [[SWI-Prolog]] (and in fact, to a certain extent, most current [[Prolog]] systems), so as to avoid giving undue weight to one, perhaps undeservedly, not very notable language. &nbsp;--[[User talk:Lambiam|Lambiam]] 13:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)