Contested case hearing: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:23, 27 February 2022

Latest revision as of 13:36, 5 July 2023

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

'''Contested case hearing''' is the name for [[quasi-judicial]] administrative hearings governed by state law.{{which|date=October 2011}} State agencies that make decisions that could affect people's “rights"rights, duties, and privileges”privileges" must have a process for holding contested case hearings. The purpose of these hearings is to provide the decision-makers with the most complete and relevant information they need to make a proper decision. These hearings are like an informal [[court proceeding]]. They have three parts:

{{Orphan|date=February 2014}}

'''Contested case hearing''' is the name for [[quasi-judicial]] administrative hearings governed by state law.{{which|date=October 2011}} State agencies that make decisions that could affect people's “rights, duties, and privileges” must have a process for holding contested case hearings. The purpose of these hearings is to provide the decision-makers with the most complete and relevant information they need to make a proper decision. These hearings are like an informal [[court proceeding]]. They have three parts:

I. Pre-hearing: where the parties and scope of the hearing is decided

Line 9 ⟶ 7:

III. Post-hearing: where the parties propose and advocate for a particular outcome

After these three phases are complete, the decision-makers decide to either approve, deny, or approve with conditions whatever it is that is being proposed. The decision can either be made at the final hearing or a later public meeting.<ref>http://www.hawaii.edu/elp/publications/faculty/Jarman/makingyourvoicecount.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}}</ref>

==Right to cross examine==

Line 39 ⟶ 37:

{{Reflist}}

[[Category:Law of the United States law]]