Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphical Identification and Authentication: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:08, 19 March 2022

Latest revision as of 04:35, 16 May 2022

Line 14:

* '''Keep''' and mark for cleanup. Article lacks context, but describes an important technology that allows Windows to use logon authentication mechanisms more secure than the usual username/password combination. [[User:JulesH|JulesH]] ([[User talk:JulesH|talk]]) 09:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

* '''Keep''' Yes, it's not at all well-written. At the very least it needs a short introductory paragraph (which I am not capable of providing, or I would do so). The topic, though, has at least modest significance, and an article on the subject is useful. [[User:Tim Ross|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green"; face="font-family:courier;">'''''Tim Ross'''''</fontspan>]] [[User_talk:Tim Ross|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green"; face="font-family:courier;">(talk)</fontspan>]] 11:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 11:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)</small>

*'''Keep''' A secure login mechanism is notable and neither bad writing nor the indiscriminate list are relevant for deletion. Bad writing is specifically excluded as a valid reason for deletion, and the article is not a list, let alone an indiscriminate one. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|^(talk)]] 11:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)