Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RPM Distribution of OpenStack: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Legobot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (1x)
 
Line 15:
* '''Keep''' - Poor or confusing article is not the basis for notability. "Reliable Source" availability is?
:* Re No references added: No surprise; No or slow editing is status quo for such articles. Did anyone else follow the "find sources" links at the tags (see below)?
:* Re "...mention in the [[OpenStack]] article might be worth it, but there is none." False? Is this not a mention there? <fontspan colorstyle="color: green;">In 2012, Red Hat announced a preview of their OpenStack distribution,[29] beginning with the "Essex" release. After another preview release, Red Hat introduced commercial support for OpenStack with the "Grizzly" release, in July 2013.[30]</fontspan> Year 2013 aligns in both articles. Yes, there may be confusion between "community-supported" and commercial versions, but the connection looks clear enough, and is not a reason for deletion, IMO.
:* This source[https://lwn.net/Articles/511428/] from that [[OpenStack]] article excerpt may parrot the press release source, but it is independent recognition and coverage, if brief.
:* Another source[https://opensource.com/business/14/4/learning-openstack-trystack] has significant coverage of RDO OpenStack in context of a person and another project, TryStack.