Comparison of backup software: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:11, 11 April 2022

Latest revision as of 07:08, 14 May 2023

(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{short description|None}}

{{More citations needed|date=October 2022}}

Feature '''comparison of backup software'''. forFor a more general comparison see [[List of backup software]].

==List ==

Feature '''comparison of backup software''' for a more general comparison see [[List of backup software]].

{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: 100%; text-align: center; font-size: smaller; table-layout: fixed;"

==Open Source==

{| class="wikitable sortable"

! Package

! Network optimized (rsync)

Line 203:

| {{no}}

|-

! [[Dump (programUnix)|dump]]

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

Line 289:

|

| {{dunno}}

| {{no}}

|-

! [[obnam]]

|

| {{yes}} chunk

| {{yes}}

|

|

|

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

|-

Line 345 ⟶ 334:

| {{dunno}}

| {{dunno}}

|-

! Zmanda Recovery Manager

|

| {{yes}}

| {{dunno}}

|

|

|

|

| {{dunno}}

| {{no}}

|-

! [[zsync]]

Line 365 ⟶ 343:

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yesno}}

|-

! [[obnamzpaq]]

| {{yes}} chunk

| {{yes}}; [[Incremental backup|Incremental]]

| {{yes}}; [[Advanced Encryption Standard|AES-256/CTR]]

| {{yes}}; [[SHA-1]]

| {{yesno}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}; through deduplication

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

Line 372 ⟶ 361:

{{Reflist}}

== External links ==

* [http://www.si-journal.org/index.php/JSI/article/view/205 Performance comparison of five remote incremental backup tools: Rsync, Rdiff-backup, Duplicity, Areca and Link-Backup]

[[Category:Backup software|*]]