Talk:Metadata registry: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:50, 21 February 2007

Latest revision as of 03:56, 6 February 2024

(13 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|

Ummmm... you're presenting the CONCEPT of metadara registries as if they exist & are in active use. In the 1970s & 1980s the industry term for this sort of work would have been under the umbrella of "data dictionary." With IBM's late 1980s AD/Cycle effort, "data dictionary" morphed to "metadata repository."

{{WikiProject Computing|auto=inherit}}

{{WikiProject Open | importance=low }}

}}

Ummmm... you're presenting the CONCEPT of metadarametadata registries as if they exist & are in active use. In the 1970s & 1980s the industry term for this sort of work would have been under the umbrella of "data dictionary." With IBM's late 1980s AD/Cycle effort, "data dictionary" morphed to "metadata repository."

While many organizations have made concerted efforts to implement the dream of an "enterprise data dictionary/metadata repository" exceedingly few have succeeded.

Line 10 ⟶ 15:

--[[User:Metajohng|Metajohng]] 18:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

I am confused. Why is there a international standard then? And how are the meta data repository vendors surviving if no one is using them?

I am confused. Why is there a international standard if it weren't real? There is a big vendor base for meta data repository. - Shazzad 02-21-07

Having standard(s) and having something actually used are not necessairly closely related.

Where is the "big vendor base"? More appropriately, where are metadata repositories—large and small—in active, daily use by CUSTOMERS? In practice spreadsheets are probably the most widely used "repositories." [[User:DEddy|DEddy]] 17:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Of course there are people paying for and using metadata registries. One of the market leading products is ASG's (now IBM's) Rochade product.

As of Thursday, March 8, 2007 I have not heard that IBM has purchased ASG's Rochade repository product. A presentation by Peter Aiken at the DAMA International/Wilshire Metadata conference offers that CA's repositories have 9% marketshare with ASG/Rochade at 7% share. The leader (at 45%) is "no repository." [[User:DEddy|DEddy]] 20:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Metadata registry is really a misnomer. If you have a business registry, the model will contain a business object class. Is there a model out there with an object class called metadata? Hardly, so there is no such a thing as a metadata registry. In fact, they are more correctly described as data registries, or some semantic representation of data, such as a data element. The use of the term metadata in this way actually confuses the issues, and conceals what is really variations of data registries. A real metadata registry, is a registry that can express all the metadata of all the systems in all the world! Another aspect of this is simply that metadata is stored in a separate sub system, and this is just an architectural solution. SAS, for example, has this architecture, but is really an application for production of statistics, not a registry in the more narrow sense of documentation. This distinction is also blurred with this vague and generalised use of a term like metadata registry. What SAS has is really a metadata server, not a repository or registry, in the narrow sense. [[[Special:Contributions/79.136.76.102|79.136.76.102]] ([[User talk:79.136.76.102|talk]]) 11:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)]

== External links modified (January 2018) ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on [[Metadata registry]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/822468569|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:

*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927100155/http://www.stylusstudio.com/xmldev/200503/post70270.html to http://www.stylusstudio.com/xmldev/200503/post70270.html

*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060423130740/http://dublincore.org/dcregistry/ to http://dublincore.org/dcregistry/

*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080414002018/http://education.state.mn.us/mde-dd/ to http://education.state.mn.us/mde-dd

*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030720125416/http://metadata.dod.mil/ to http://metadata.dod.mil/

*Added archive https://archive.is/20130729201604/http://www.asg.com/Products/View/ASG-Rochade.aspx?lang=en-US to http://www.asg.com/Products/View/ASG-Rochade.aspx?lang=en-US

*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100928143423/http://www.octagonresearch.com/metadata-registry.html to http://www.octagonresearch.com/metadata-registry.html

*Added archive https://archive.is/20121219042857/http://www.tiu.ac.jp/org/openforum2006/ to http://www.tiu.ac.jp/org/openforum2006/

*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051202171852/http://www.cnis.gov.cn/openforum/english/meeting2/INDEX.htm to http://www.cnis.gov.cn/openforum/english/meeting2/index.htm

*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130126101115/http://www.metalounge.org/_literature_52579/Stephen_Machin_%E2%80%93_ON_METADATA_AND_METACONTENT to http://www.metalounge.org/_literature_52579/Stephen_Machin_%E2%80%93_ON_METADATA_AND_METACONTENT

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 15:15, 26 January 2018 (UTC)