Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael Popper: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) →[[Rafael Popper]]: close, delete, will this work right this time? |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10:
*'''Delete and Salt''' - no demonstration of notability, created by the subject, patent [[WP:COI]]. --[[User:Haemo|Haemo]] 03:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' unless multiple, independent sources are included that demonstrate beyond a doubt that this subject passes [[Wikipedia:Notability (academics)]], especially since this seems to be autobiographical. Note that {{user|Rafael popper}} is a new user and was probably not aware of the policies he was breaking. I've posted to his talk page a detailed discussion of the problems with such articles and how they may be dealt with. ~ [[User:Jeffq|Jeff Q]] [[User talk:Jeffq|(talk)]] 03:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above and [[WP:SPAM]] seems applicable too.[[User:Nescio|<
*'''Delete''' per nom and [[WP:SPAM]]. [[User:Dcandeto|dcandeto]] 16:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' [[WP:SPAM]] and loads of external links placed everywhere, no external links sections and its notability is lacking.'''
*'''Delete''' lacks the sources to pass [[WP:BIO]], and obvious [[WP:SPAM]] concerns.-- [[User:danntm|danntm]] <sup>[[user talk:danntm|T]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Danntm|C]]</sub> 19:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Speedy Keep''': Meets [[WP:V]] and [[WP:N]], what more do you Nazi's want? -[[User:Dual Freq|Dual Freq]] 19:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|