Longest common substring: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m David Eppstein moved page Longest-common-substring problem to Longest common substring: "Problem" in the title is content-free noise, and the newly added hyphens by User:FlaxenHobbit make it worse. Move to the better title without all the junk.
Undid revision 1292155026 by Daniel.Cardenas (talk): fits in the schem described at Dynamic_programming#Computer_science
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Computer science problem}}
{{Wikibooks |Algorithm Implementation/Strings/Longest common substring}}
{{Distinguish|longest- common-subsequence problemsubsequence}}
In [[computer science]], thea '''longest- common-substring problemsubstring''' isof totwo findor more strings is a longest [[string (computer science)|string]] that is a [[substring]] of twoall orof them. There may be more stringsthan one longest common substring. TheApplications probleminclude may[[data havededuplication]] multipleand solutions[[plagiarism detection]].
Applications include [[data deduplication]] and [[plagiarism detection]].
 
==Examples==
[[File:LongestSubstring svg.svg|thumb|The strings "BADANAT" and "CANADAS" share the maximal-length substrings "ADA" and "ANA".]]
The picture shows two strings where the problem has multiple solutions. Although the substring occurrences always overlap, noit longeris commonimpossible substringto canobtain bea obtainedlonger common substring by "uniting" them.
 
The strings "ABABC", "BABCA" and "ABCBA" have only one longest common substring, viz. "ABC" of length 3. Other common substrings are "A", "AB", "B", "BA", "BC" and "C".
Line 19:
Given two strings, <math>S</math> of length <math>m</math> and <math>T</math> of length <math>n</math>, find a longest string which is substring of both <math>S</math> and <math>T</math>.
 
A generalization is the '''k''-'''common substring problem'''. Given the set of strings <math>S = \{S_1, ...\ldots, S_K\}</math>, where <math>|S_i|=n_i</math> and <math display=inline>\Sigmasum n_i = N</math>. Find for each <math>2 \leq k \leq K</math>, a longest string which occurs as substring of at least <math>k</math> strings.
 
==Algorithms==
One can find the lengths and starting positions of the longest common substrings of <math>S</math> and <math>T</math> in [[Big O notation#Family of Bachmann–Landau notations|<math>\Theta</math>]]<math>(n+m)</math> time with the help of a [[generalized suffix tree]]. A faster algorithm can be achieved in the [[word RAM]] model of computation if the size <math>\sigma</math> of the input alphabet is in <math>2^{o \left( \sqrt{\log(n+m)} \right) }</math>. In particular, this algorithm runs in <math display=inline>O\left( (n+m) \log \sigma/\sqrt{\log (n+m)} \right) </math> time using <math>O\left((n+m)\log\sigma/\log (n+m) \right)</math> space.<ref name="CKPR21">{{cite conference | last1 = Charalampopoulos | first1 = Panagiotis | last2 = Kociumaka | first2 = Tomasz | last3 = Pissis | first3 = Solon P. | last4 = Radoszewski | first4 = Jakub | date = Aug 2021 | title = Faster Algorithms for Longest Common Substring | conference = European Symposium on Algorithms | editor1-last=Mutzel|editor1-first=Petra|editor2-last=Pagh|editor2-first=Rasmus|editor3-last=Herman|editor3-first=Grzegorz | publisher=Schloss Dagstuhl | series=Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) | volume=204 | doi = 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2021.30 | doi-access = free }} Here: Theorem 1, p.30:2.</ref> Solving the problem by [[dynamic programming]] costs <math>\Theta(nm)</math>. The solutions to the generalized problem take <math>\Theta(n_1 + ...\cdots + n_K)</math> space and <math>\Theta(n_1</math>·...·<math> \cdots n_K)</math> time with [[dynamic programming]] and take <math>\Theta((n_1 + ...\cdots + n_K) * K)</math> time with a [[generalized suffix tree]].
 
===Suffix tree===
Line 31:
 
===Dynamic programming===
The following pseudocode finds the set of longest common substrings between two strings with [[Dynamic_programming#Computer_science|dynamic programming]]:
 
'''function''' LCSubstrLongestCommonSubstring(S[1..r], T[1..n])
L := '''array'''(1..r, 1..n)
z := 0 # length of the longest common substring found so far
z := 0
ret := {}
Line 47:
'''if''' L[i, j] > z
z := L[i, j]
ret := {S[(i − z + 1)..i]}
'''else''' '''if''' L[i, j] = z
ret := ret ∪ {S[(i − z + 1)..i]}
'''else'''
L[i, j] := 0
'''return''' ret
 
This algorithm runs in <math>O(n r)</math> time. The array <code>L</code> stores the length of the longest common substringsuffix of the prefixes <code>S[1..i]</code> and <code>T[1..j]</code> which ''end at position'' <code>S[i]</code>, and <code>T[j]</code>, resprespectively. The variable <code>z</code> is used to hold the length of the longest common substring found so far. The set <code>ret</code> is used to hold the set of strings which are of length <code>z</code>. The set <code>ret</code> can be saved efficiently by just storing the index <code>i</code>, which is the last character of the longest common substring (of size z) instead of <code>S[(i-z+1)..i]</code>. Thus all the longest common substrings would be, for each i in <code>ret</code>, <code>S[(ret[i]-z)..(ret[i])]</code>.
 
The following tricks can be used to reduce the memory usage of an implementation:
* Keep only the last and current row of the DP table to save memory (<math>O(\min(r, n))</math> instead of <math>O(n r)</math>)
** The last and current row can be stored on the same 1D array by traversing the inner loop backwards
* Store only non-zero values in the rows. This can be done using hash-tables instead of arrays. This is useful for large alphabets.