Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alphabet Synthesis Machine: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
m Fix Linter errors. |
||
Line 11:
*'''Delete''' A work in nascence. Could be interesting; come back when analysis is complete. [[User:Denni|D]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:green">'''''e'''''</span>]][[User:Denni|nni]] [[User_talk:Denni|<span style="color:green">☯</span>]] 03:39, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
*Are you sure you checked this out? It doesn't aim to analyze anything. It's an interactive work of art that creates generates fictional alphabet scripts. Runs quite well, which is why PBS covers it. [[User:Durova|Durova]] 09:50, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. The only reason it was covered by PBS is that it was ''commissioned'' by PBS - it says so right at the top of the website, "An interactive online artwork '''created for''' Art21 and '''PBS'''". So I really don't think we can use the PBS references as evidence of media attention. I can't find any others, though - could you identify these typography periodicals you think have given it legitimate attention, please, [[User:Durova|Durova]]?<p>As for Google - most of the mentions on Google appear to be passing comments on blogs... — [[User:Haeleth|Haeleth]] <small>[[User_talk:Haeleth|Talk]]</small> 21:59, 24 November 2005 (UTC)</p>
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
|