Content deleted Content added
→"For Normal"?: Reply |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Books}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance. Tag: |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
}}
{{merged from|F4 (paper)|15 April 2017}}
▲{{WikiProject Books|class=start|importance=low}}
{{Photo requested}}
Line 50 ⟶ 52:
:'Normal' as in to be used for writing or typing letters compared with paper that was to be used for 'printing'. Given that printing was generally not widely carried out at a domestic/office level until the late 1980's, this would have been commercial printing, or so I presume. [[Special:Contributions/92.8.133.167|92.8.133.167]] ([[User talk:92.8.133.167|talk]]) 18:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
::I would imagine printers would use full size foolscap folio and then trim after folding and binding (or not, leaving the reader to cut each page with a paper knife), whereas letter paper was sold pre-trimmed to 13 x 8.
::Possibly the printers' size had (traditionally) irregular edges, whereas writing paper was nicely trimmed similarly to how timber was traditionally sold. A length of, say, 3"x2" rough sawn timber has actual dimensions of 3"x2", whereas 3"x2" planed all round timber might have actual dimensions of 2¾" x 1⅞" as it was planed from a 3"x2" actual dimensions length of rough sawn as a second process.
::It would be interesting to hear this confirmed or negated by someone with actual experience in commercial printing.[[Special:Contributions/92.8.133.167|92.8.133.167]] ([[User talk:92.8.133.167|talk]]) 18:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
| |||