Help talk:Footnotes: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Help talk:Footnotes/Archive 2) (bot
 
(44 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject Helpbanner shell|class=NA|importance=high}}
{{Wikipedia Help Project|class=NA|importance=high}}
}}
{{Copied |from=Help:Footnotes |from_oldid=629857606 |to=Help:Automatically generated reference list |to_diff=630324883}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 36 ⟶ 38:
}}
 
== Interfering note lists ==
== Help re: use of one of these templates (not working) ==
 
I just attempted to add an (awkward) endnote here ([[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Velma_(TV_series)&oldid=1138556797]]), and it is showing in the mainspace, but when I cursor over it, it is not giving the normal infobox, and clicking on it does not actually take me down to the note (nor does clicking on the caret in the note take me back up to the inline ___location). Could anyone let me know what I did wrong / troubleshoot? Thanks. ''[[User:Peace and Passion|Peace and Passion]]'' <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">&#9774;</span>&nbsp; ''([[User talk:Peace and Passion|"I'm listening...."]])'' 09:07, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 
:The documentation for {{tl|r}} could be clearer, but apparently refname is not optional. I've added a temporary refname [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Velma_(TV_series)&diff=prev&oldid=1138565715 here], and the note works as expected. Feel free to change the refname to something more appropriate. -- LCU '''[[User:ActivelyDisinterested|ActivelyDisinterested]]''' <small>''∆[[User talk:ActivelyDisinterested|transmissions]]∆'' °[[Special:Contributions/ActivelyDisinterested|co-ords]]°</small> 10:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 
::Yeah, I had some difficulty with that documentation, so I ultimately just attempted to wing it. Thank you for your assistance! ''[[User:Peace and Passion|Peace and Passion]]'' <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">&#9774;</span>&nbsp; ''([[User talk:Peace and Passion|"I'm listening...."]])'' 04:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 
== Overview include RefToolbar ==
 
I suggest include in the '''Overview''' section the text, from the RefToolbar section:
 
{{main|Wikipedia:RefToolbar/2.0}}
[[File:Cite web named ref 01.png|thumb|400px|Using the citation toolbar to name the first reference.]]
[[File:Citation toolbar named ref.png|thumb|400px|Using the citation toolbar to insert additional references to the first source.]]
You can use the citation toolbar to name references. When you first create a reference, you can enter a value in the "Ref name" box.
 
When you want to reuse this reference, click the "Named references" button on the citation toolbar and choose which reference you would like to insert.
<br><br> [[Special:Contributions/147.84.199.21|147.84.199.21]] ([[User talk:147.84.199.21|talk]]) 08:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 
== Footnotes: using a source more than once ==
 
Section [[Help:Footnotes#Footnotes: using a source more than once]] describe the case where there are multiple identical citations of the same source. It does not, however, describe, e.g., the use of {{tl|rp}} to cite different locations within the same source, quoting different passages within the same source. -- [[User:Chatul|Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul]] ([[User talk:Chatul|talk]]) 11:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
:See also [[Help:Shortened footnotes]]. Using shortened footnotes you write the source citation once at the bottom, then use references to link to it. The references can include page numbers or other ___location information which will be collated automatically. See as an example [[NBR 224 and 420 Classes]] and note that, for instance reference 10 shows 5 references to page 66 being collected together and that there 8 different pages references in SLS (1970), yet the full bibliographic citation is only required once. [[User:Martin of Sheffield|Martin of Sheffield]] ([[User talk:Martin of Sheffield|talk]]) 13:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
::Yes, {{tl|sfn}} is useful, but {{para|ps}} doesn't provide the functionality of {{para|quote}}, and repurposing {{para|loc}} to provide a quote is kludgy at best.
::IAC, shouldn't there be some guidance for new editors in that section? -- [[User:Chatul|Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul]] ([[User talk:Chatul|talk]]) 18:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
:::You can use the {{tl|harv}} family of templates if you want to do something specific with a quote, as something like {{tl|harvnb}} or {{tl|harvp}} is used inside ref tags. So you can include anytext, including urls that can't be used in quote fields, after the template but before the closing tag.<br>
:::I think the issue with going to far into the details of any particular way of referencing is that it's just one way of doing referencing, and none of them are more or less acceptable (apart from parenthical per [[WP:PAREN]]). -- LCU '''[[User:ActivelyDisinterested|ActivelyDisinterested]]''' <small>''∆[[User talk:ActivelyDisinterested|transmissions]]∆'' °[[Special:Contributions/ActivelyDisinterested|co-ords]]°</small> 19:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 
Is there a way to use groups to prevent note lists used only for an infobox from interfering with other note lists used elsewhere in an article? For instance, [[Special:Permalink/1220598759|here]], the note "lr note" should be appearing in the "notelist-lr" section, not in the infobox. (Courtesy pinging @[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]], as this relates to your change.) <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF;text-decoration:inherit;font:1em Lucida Sans">Sdkb</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 20:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
== Period at the end of a footnote ==
:Yes, you could use markup and a unique group name instead of the efn-lr template. See [[WP:REFGROUP]] --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 20:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
:There are several forms of {{tlx|efn}}, not just {{tlx|efn-lr}}; each one has a matching notelist. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] &#x1f339; ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 20:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
::I tried that [[Special:Diff/1220603333|here]], but I didn't see it working in the preview of my sandbox and don't see it working live either. <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF;text-decoration:inherit;font:1em Lucida Sans">Sdkb</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 20:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
:::{{replyto|Sdkb}} Don't use a manual group, use one of the predefined forms as I advised. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] &#x1f339; ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 20:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
::::The issue is that an article could be using any of the existing predefined forms, so they would all potentially interfere. We also want to keep the lower roman formatting without a visual change. <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF;text-decoration:inherit;font:1em Lucida Sans">Sdkb</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 21:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::Your problem at [[Template:Infobox U.S. college admissions]] is because neither template accepts a {{para|group}} parameter. At [[User:Sdkb/sandbox/early drafts]], change <syntaxhighlight lang=wikitext>blah more blah.{{efn-lr|lr note}}</syntaxhighlight> to <syntaxhighlight lang=wikitext>blah more blah.{{efn-ur|ur note}}</syntaxhighlight> and <syntaxhighlight lang=wikitext>==Notelist-lr==
{{notelist-lr}}</syntaxhighlight> to <syntaxhighlight lang=wikitext>==Notelist-ur==
{{notelist-ur}}</syntaxhighlight> This will not then conflict. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] &#x1f339; ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 21:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::I think Sdkb point is that they want to use {{tl|efn-lr}} style notes, and include a {{tl|notelist-lr}} in the infobox, but not catch {{efn-lr}} notes from outside the infobox in that notelist. If they use {{tl|efn-ua}} they would not want to catch {{tl|efn-ua}} notes from outside the infobox. I don't believe there's anyway of doing this with the currently available options. -- <small>LCU</small> '''[[User:ActivelyDisinterested|A<small>ctively</small>D<small>isinterested</small>]]''' <small>''«[[User talk:ActivelyDisinterested|@]]» °[[Special:Contributions/ActivelyDisinterested|∆t]]°''</small> 22:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Yes, that's correct, Actively. Too bad there isn't currently a solution — is there a Phabricator ticket or some other technical project that might offer one? <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF;text-decoration:inherit;font:1em Lucida Sans">Sdkb</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 01:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::::In the meantime, @[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]], I wonder if we should just go back to the manual footnotes to avoid the possibility of conflicts? <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF;text-decoration:inherit;font:1em Lucida Sans">Sdkb</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 01:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::This was brought up at [[Template talk:Notelist#The group= parameter is not working as documented]] about six years ago, notelist doesn't use group in the same way as {{tl|reflist}}. So it can't be used in the way you want to use it. -- <small>LCU</small> '''[[User:ActivelyDisinterested|A<small>ctively</small>D<small>isinterested</small>]]''' <small>''«[[User talk:ActivelyDisinterested|@]]» °[[Special:Contributions/ActivelyDisinterested|∆t]]°''</small> 22:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
::EFN only works with the predefined groups. Instead, you can use Reflist or the magic word. Alternatively, we can just remove the notelist from the template and put it at the bottom of each article, integrated with any other explanatory footnotes. --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 03:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
::: Or in other words, {{tl|efn}} is implemented by [[Template:Efn]], with the predefined groups that Bsherr mentioned, whereas &lt;ref>s are implemented by the Wikimedia software, with whatever group names you legally define. So they are not symmetric. And since the {{tl|Efn}} template is not Wikimedia software, a Phab ticket doesn't seem like the right venue. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 09:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
::::{{u|Mathglot}}, this has still been bugging me a bit. Would you have a suggestion besides a Phabricator ticket for addressing this? <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF;text-decoration:inherit;font:1em Lucida Sans">Sdkb</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 20:54, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
:::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_U.S._college_admissions/sandbox&oldid=1220806953 Custom anchors] should work, or the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_U.S._college_admissions/sandbox&direction=next&oldid=1220806953 listref/relist template] which is so rarely used outside of lists and glossaries that it is unlikely to ever conflict with this college admissions template? [[User:Rjjiii|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rjj<sup>iii</sup></span>]] ([[User talk:Rjjiii|talk]]) 00:51, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
::::: Sdkb, I tried a bunch of things, but couldn't find an alternative, but looks like Rjjiii did, and that solution ought to be added to the doc of a few templates so it can be discovered more easily. If you want to follow up at another venue, I would say [[Module talk:Footnotes]], but anyone monitoring there is probably looking here as well, so not sure if practically speaking that will gain anything, but maybe it's worth adding a discussion advisory/feedback request there linking this discussion. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 02:04, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
::::::Ooh, thanks both! I'll look into those options, Rjiii. <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF;text-decoration:inherit;font:1em Lucida Sans">Sdkb</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 04:35, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
:::::::@[[User:Sdkb|Sdkb]] Posting some more stuff to clarify. So, the ref tags and templates that invoke them like {{tl|efn}} do several things:
:::::::# Create an anchor link from the superscript callout down the correct footnote.
:::::::# Highlight the footnote when the superscript callout link is clicked.
:::::::# Display the footnote in mouseover popup on desktop.
:::::::# On mobile: replace the above the 3 behaviors with a popup at the bottom of the screen containing the footnote when the superscript callout is clicked.
:::::::# Automatically create a list of the references with backlinks to the superscript callouts.
:::::::The solutions I mentioned above, do the '''first 3''' and not the second two. On mobile, they work like anchor links and there is no mouse-over popup because there is no mouse. It's probably not realistic to try to recreate the mobile behavior. Older versions of those templates used the reference class that ref tags and {{tl|efn}} use. This worked on desktop, but the JavaScript for mobile would just break the links. I tried reporting this, but the solution was just to take out the reference class.
:::::::The {{tl|ran}}/{{tl|rma}} and {{tl|listref}}/{{tl|listref/reflist}} template pairs were both created for sort of the same reason. They are meant to avoid creating backlinks. If you cite a couple biographies a hundred times or cite the same directory hundreds of times, then the software goes buckwild and gives [[Template:Rma#Back_links|so many links they become useless]]. There is another template {{tl|citeref}} that also does something similar and could be used. (It was made to create links between footnotes, which sounds very useful for the ''[[House of Leaves]]'' article. While [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_U.S._college_admissions/sandbox&oldid=1285181020 trying out citeref], I started thinking that maybe the best solution isn't actually available right now.
:::::::Ran & listref both work, but say you have a navbox and infobox that both use them. In that case, you could end up with duplicate anchor links which are invalid HTML and could make the links point to the wrong target. This is less an issue with {{tl|ran}}, because each template would be picking a letter or handful of letters. So the odds go down pretty low pretty quickly (1/26, 1/676, 1/17576). That said, I think the correct solution is to add something into the callout template and footnote template that is meant just for use in other templates. Call the parameter {{para|tm-id}} or whatever is easy to remember. Then when you invoke {{tl|rma}} (or {{tl|listref}} which is just a wrapper for it), you would use the same {{para|tm-id}} throughout a single template. This way, it wouldn't matter if you had six navboxes all using the template with <sup style="color:blue;">[i]</sup> because their links would each be using an anchor that is inherently unique: <code>#CITEREFtm-uscollegedamissions-i</code> instead of <code>#CITEREFi</code>
:::::::If there is interest, I can try an example in one of the sandboxes, [[User:Rjjiii|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rjj<sup>iii</sup></span>]] ([[User talk:Rjjiii|talk]]) 20:46, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
::::::::@[[User:Sdkb|Sdkb]] & [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]]: Changes are done in all 5 template sandboxes. I think [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_U.S._college_admissions/sandbox&oldid=1285405725 this version] will just work, and will just work for *box templates in general. If conflicts linking ever do pop up, one template can just use a more specific {{para|tm-id}}. [[User:Rjjiii|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rjj<sup>iii</sup></span>]] ([[User talk:Rjjiii|talk]]) 14:47, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::I pushed the changes live to {{tl|rma}}, {{tl|ran}}, {{tl|listref}}, and {{tl|listref/reflist}}. Some brief explanation is now at [[Template:Listref#Within templates]]. I can update the initial template that started this thread soon if there are no objections, questions, or concerns. [[User:Rjjiii|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rjj<sup>iii</sup></span>]] ([[User talk:Rjjiii|talk]]) 17:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::I've been meaning to look over the fixes, and haven't had a chance but trust your work. Much thanks for taking this on! <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF;text-decoration:inherit;font:1em Lucida Sans">Sdkb</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 18:04, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
 
== "Unique" vs. "distinct ==
This guide doesn't specify whether to put a period at the end of a footnote that isn't a complete sentence. It contains some examples that do and some that don't. Something should be said about this – either that a period should or shouldn't be placed, or that this should be handled consistently within a footnote section, or that it's up to the author of the individual footnote. [[User:Joriki|Joriki]] ([[User talk:Joriki|talk]]) 12:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 
I see "unique" used to mean "distinct", when its precise meaning is the opposite. (Unique name means the same reference has only one name. Distinct names means two references don't have the same name.) I am unable to find the text to change the word. Where is the text? It appears to be linked by "refname rules", but where is that? [[User:Zaslav|Zaslav]] ([[User talk:Zaslav|talk]]) 23:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
:Can you provide an example? Regards, <span style="border-radius:8em;padding:0 7px;background:orange">[[User:Thinker78|<span style="color:white">'''Thinker78'''</span>]]</span> [[User talk:Thinker78|(talk)]] 02:26, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
::The footnote text "LibreOffice For Starters, First Edition, Flexible Minds, Manchester, 2002, p. 18" is used several times, mostly without a period at the end, but in the section [[Help:Footnotes#Footnotes: using a source more than once|Footnotes: using a source more than once]] it's used with a period (twice). In the section [[Help:Footnotes#Footnotes: embedding references|Footnotes: embedding references]], all the footnotes end in a period. In the section [[Help:Footnotes#Footnotes: predefined groups|Footnotes: predefined groups]], none of them do. In the section [[Help:Footnotes#Footnotes: groups|Footnotes: groups]], the ones in the Notes section don't but the one in the References section does. [[User:Joriki|Joriki]] ([[User talk:Joriki|talk]]) 10:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
:::Fair point. I think in general they should have a period at the end, because that indicates more that a word set has ended rather than not having it. Regards, <span style="border-radius:8em;padding:0 7px;background:orange">[[User:Thinker78|<span style="color:white">'''Thinker78'''</span>]]</span> [[User talk:Thinker78|(talk)]] 21:59, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
::::Beware that this can be an issue of [[WP:CITEVAR]]. The reason some of the references have a period at the end is because they use {{tl|cite book}}, which generates an output with a period at the end. If {{tl|citation}} was used it wouldn't have a period at the end. Obviously when plain text is used it will be a matter of preference. -- LCU '''[[User:ActivelyDisinterested|ActivelyDisinterested]]''' <small>''∆[[User talk:ActivelyDisinterested|transmissions]]∆'' °[[Special:Contributions/ActivelyDisinterested|co-ords]]°</small> 22:56, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
:::::Fair point. References are mostly nowadays automatic. Regards, <span style="border-radius:8em;padding:0 7px;background:orange">[[User:Thinker78|<span style="color:white">'''Thinker78'''</span>]]</span> [[User talk:Thinker78|(talk)]] 00:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
:::::So, if I understand [[WP:CITEVAR]] correctly, this should be handled consistently per article, based on the prevailing style of the article? If so, I think it would be good to mention that on this help page, and to make the footnotes in the section [[Help:Footnotes#Footnotes: groups|Footnotes: groups]] consistent (since they're meant to be in the same article). [[User:Joriki|Joriki]] ([[User talk:Joriki|talk]]) 11:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
:
:Any guidance given should distinguish between explanatory footnotes and references; if the rules are the same, it should use wording like "for both explanatory footenotes and references,". -- [[User:Chatul|Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul]] ([[User talk:Chatul|talk]]) 09:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
::Unfortunately Wikipedia doesn't have a hard and fast rule to distinguish between what is a footnote and what is a reference. You can use {{tl|efn}} or {{para|group}} and have them listed separately, or you can just mix them in with all the other references. You could even then call the article section that contains all of those explanatory notes and references "Footnotes". All of that would be acceptable by Wikipedia's standards. Trying to set one hard rule would run foul of [[WP:CITEVAR]]. -- LCU '''[[User:ActivelyDisinterested|ActivelyDisinterested]]''' <small>''∆[[User talk:ActivelyDisinterested|transmissions]]∆'' °[[Special:Contributions/ActivelyDisinterested|co-ords]]°</small> 11:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
:::I wasn't suggesting setting one hard rule after you pointed out [[WP:CITEVAR]]. Please see above for my suggestion. [[User:Joriki|Joriki]] ([[User talk:Joriki|talk]]) 12:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
::::This was in reply to Metz's comment about clarifying the difference between footnotes and references, not your suggestion. I have nothing against making the page more consistent. -- LCU '''[[User:ActivelyDisinterested|ActivelyDisinterested]]''' <small>''∆[[User talk:ActivelyDisinterested|transmissions]]∆'' °[[Special:Contributions/ActivelyDisinterested|co-ords]]°</small> 17:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 
== Line breaks for ref refnotes ==
Based on the discussion above, I removed a period in [[Help:Footnotes#Footnotes: groups|Footnotes: groups]] to make the example consistent. I'd suggest adding something like this: "The style of footnotes (e.g. whether footnotes that aren't complete sentences end in a period) should be consistent within an article but may vary across articles. See also [[WP:CITEVAR]]." But I don't see a good place for this – the only place that currently has this level of detail is [[Help:Footnotes#Formatting ref tags|Formatting ref tags]], but this is about all footnotes, not just ref tags. [[User:Joriki|Joriki]] ([[User talk:Joriki|talk]]) 10:04, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
 
[[File:Ref line break.jpg|thumb|400px]]In limited cases, the <ref> generated footnote numbers are breaking lines, even when the <ref> is correctly flush with the preceding characters, i.e. no space. It seems to only occur in Firefox, not Chrome, only in wide mode and not standard and only when logged in (Vector 2022). I used the [[fluorine]] article for testing. Just a heads up if anyone is interested. — [[User talk:AjaxSmack|<span style="border:1px solid #004705;background:#168c1d;padding:2px;color:#e9ede9;text-shadow:black 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em; font-family: Georgia;">&nbsp;'''AjaxSmack'''&nbsp;</span>]] 19:27, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
== List-defined references in the Visual Editor ==
:This has been requested before, but not on this page. It's not been done because the amount of work that would be needed simply isn't worth it: cases like this are rare, and are also dependent on factors such as browser, device width, font size etc. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] &#x1f339; ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 21:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
::Thanks for the explanation. It doesn't bother me as long as it doesn't affect the unwashed masses. (And thanks for pointing out in your edit summary that <ref> tags don't belong in headers.) <small> — [[User talk:AjaxSmack|<span style="border:1px solid #004705;background:#168c1d;padding:2px;color:#e9ede9;text-shadow:black 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em; font-family: Georgia;">&nbsp;'''AjaxSmack'''&nbsp;</span>]] 22:00, 15 July 2024 (UTC)</small>
 
==Discussion at [[:Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#New proposal: deprecate &#123;&#123;reflist&#124;refs&#61; in favor of &lt;references&gt;?|Wikipedia talk:Citing sources §&nbsp;New proposal: deprecate &#123;&#123;reflist&#124;refs&#61; in favor of &lt;references&gt;?]]==
Hi, this page says "{{tq|Note that when you use the visual editor, you will not be able to add, remove, or change list-defined references.}}" but it seems that they now work? Was this fixed recently? They still do not work with [[Template:reflist]]. [[User:Rjjiii|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rjj<sup>iii</sup></span>]]([[User talk:Rjjiii#top|talk]]) 00:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|25px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[:Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#New proposal: deprecate &#123;&#123;reflist&#124;refs&#61; in favor of &lt;references&gt;?|Wikipedia talk:Citing sources §&nbsp;New proposal: deprecate &#123;&#123;reflist&#124;refs&#61; in favor of &lt;references&gt;?]]. <span title="Signature of Dan Leonard">[[User:Dan Leonard|Dan Leonard]] ([[User talk:Dan Leonard|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Leonard|contribs]])</span> 03:02, 30 April 2025 (UTC)<!-- [[Template:Please see]] -->