Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blogger's contract: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:36, 21 March 2005

Latest revision as of 06:35, 24 April 2006

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. <br >The result of the debate was '''copyvio'''. &ndash; [[User:ABCD|AB]][[User talk:ABCD|'''''CD''''']] 19:34, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

===[[Blogger's contract]]===

Unencyclopedic. Google search reveals few hits, which for anything related to blogs doesn't bode well; doesn't seem to be widely used. [[User:Mindspillage|Mindspillage]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill yours?)]] 15:56, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Specific to being a student. Might make more sense in context of an article about Internet-based educational practices or something. Sitting out by itself, no. Since it is mostly an example taken from an external website, is it a copyvio? [[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] 16:11, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

*I tagged it as '''copyvio''' from [http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:kRTAJ0H-Z6UJ:www.landmark-project.com/blogmeister/bloggers_contract.doc+%22Acknowledging+that+blogging+is+a+legitimate%22+contract&hl=en here] [[User:DaveTheRed|DaveTheRed]] 23:36, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''.

</div >