Talk:Procedural programming: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}, {{WikiProject Computer science}}.
m Reverted edit by Nkosinat (talk) to last version by Graham87
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Talk header|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|archive_age=365}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Mid |science=y |science-importance=Mid |software=y |software-importance=Mid |early-comp=y |early-comp-importance=Mid}}
Line 13:
| minthreadsleft = 0
}}
 
== Comparison with object-oriented programming ==
 
I would like to see less of the editorial slant in favor of OOP in that topic.
For example,
instead of using phrases like "it's undeniable that OOP is better at"
please use phrases like "Many people believe that OOP is better at".
Also, I would like to see some more information about how procedural programming
can be superior to OOP.