Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arlo Rose: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Robot - Removing extraneous links to old VfD templates. |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. <br >The result of the debate was '''delete.''' (IP votes not counted) - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 17:11, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
===[[Arlo Rose]]===
Seems to be a vanity page. Even if Arlo Rose didn't write this, I don't believe he is noteworthy enough to warrant an article here. [[User:Oliverkeenan|Oliver Keenan]] 20:53, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
Line 5 ⟶ 8:
* '''Delete''', though I've heard of Konfabulator, which could alternatively be "merged" with this article. --[[User:Asriel86|Asriel86]] 23:22, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' not notable [[User:Dsmdgold|Dsmdgold]] 01:29, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' I get an email or so a week asking why my link in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eazel Eazel] entry is a dead link, so I added one. Delete if you want, but then someone should edit the Edit the Eazel page (where someone felt I was notable). --[[User:69.238.246.117|69.238.246.117]] 22:00, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
*Another quick note... I asked some folks that were more familiar with the Wikipedia etiquette, and they suggest how to rewrite the entry to be more like Darin's or Andy's. I've now fixed it so that you all will find it more acceptable. --[[User:69.238.246.117|69.238.246.117]] 01:57, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
*Sorry, but still agree with the '''Delete''' votes above. If asked why your link is red, you might consider unlinking it. [[User:Radiant!| ]][[User_talk:Radiant!|Radiant]][[meta:mergist|_*]] 09:31, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
*I guess I'm not clear on how [[Darin Adler]], [[Bud Tribble]], [[Dave Hyatt]], or any of the other software developers I see on here are okay, but I'm not.--[[User:69.238.246.117|69.238.246.117]] 18:39, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep and rework''' This man is probably significant enough to deserve a least a small biography. Nothing radical. The current article does suck, though. --[[User:Huwr|huwr]] 14:14, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' He is a valid contributor to the Eazel project. More information is better than less.
:''This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''.'' </div >
| |||