Content deleted Content added
Gnomingstuff (talk | contribs) rm WP:NOTFORUM, add header |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 13:
Added WikiLink to [[User:Mathstat/Ward's_method]] <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jmajf|Jmajf]] ([[User talk:Jmajf|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jmajf|contribs]]) 12:49, 28 November 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
==
In the section "Metric" am I right that the "i" across which some of the distance metrics are summed is an index of data dimension? i.e. bivariate data will be i = {1, 2}.
Line 91 ⟶ 86:
:It seems that just a quick look at the issue has not realized my point about this issue. [[Special:Contributions/223.16.242.216|223.16.242.216]] ([[User talk:223.16.242.216|talk]]) 09:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
::Your dates are incorrect, it was added more recently than what you suggest. But that's not really relevant - that content has been in an article for a while does not mean it cannot be altered or removed - Wikipedia's policies grant no special protections to text just because it has been around for a while. [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 18:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
:::Dear MrOllie,
:::Thanks for your reply to my message. Your reply is highly appreciated, as a Wiki Editor will need to take care of many pages voluntarily.
:::In your last message, I am happy to know that, finally there is Wiki Editor to understand that all the 17 items in the summary tables are there before April 26-27, 2024, when I tried to learn the Wiki Edit function and added an additional link to the existing record Mini-max linkage on top of its existing one link. On April 26-27, 2024, before I learn to practice the Wiki Edit function, indeed, I watched a Wiki Edit introductory video, and said that one is welcome to make try this function. Yes, there is the Wiki Editor to decide if the changes are appropriate or not. Nevertheless, the usual practice may be just to restore its changes to the original version, if the editor does not think the changes appropriate.
:::Yet, in this case, at least the record has existed there quite Mini-max linkage some time before April 26-27, 2024, and its existence is independent of the editing of that additional second link. Now, I have a question: why this record was chosen to be delete on the same dates by our Wiki Editor during April 26-27, 2024? It is very easy to think that this deletion of this existing record may be due to over-reacting / over-deleting to the trial to add one more link on April 26-27, 2024. The mathematical structure of Mini-max linkage (which is discovered in 2004) is somehow a little similar to Hausdorff linkage (discovered in 2007). Now the earlier discovered Mini-max linkage is chosen to be deleted by the Wiki Editor, while the later discovered Hausdorff linkage is chosen to be remained there in the table, may I know why there are such difference?
:::Anyway, really thanks for your previous reply out of your voluntary time.
:::It will be highly appreciated if any Wiki Editor can look deeper at this issue to see if there is any logical thinking that can be further improved in this case here. [[Special:Contributions/223.16.242.216|223.16.242.216]] ([[User talk:223.16.242.216|talk]]) 09:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
| |||