Talk:One-way function: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1231433054 by 50.220.179.25 (talk) NOTAFORUM gibberish inserted into almost 20-year-old thread
Zipore (talk | contribs)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 134:
:See [[Probabilistic Turing machine]]. Could be better named. [[User:Deco|Deco]] 11:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
:The auxiliary string isn't so much to inform the algorithm, it's simply to enforce a minimum length on the input. This is important because we defined the algorithm as working in polynomial time (implicitly tied to input length), but we actually just want the full f∘A'∘f to work in polynomial time, and the size of the input to f can dominate the size of the input to A'. I've removed the auxiliary string from the definition and added language instead, to reduce confusion. [[Special:Contributions/88.115.207.64|88.115.207.64]] ([[User talk:88.115.207.64|talk]]) 17:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
:Can I ask why you needed it 'today' then and if it was relevant to the one-way functional? [[Special:Contributions/50.220.179.25|50.220.179.25]] ([[User talk:50.220.179.25|talk]]) 07:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 
==Other types of function==
Line 239 ⟶ 238:
 
This statement implies P != NP and is therefore currently unknown. It should therefore be removed. (If P = NP, then P != NP is false and thus trivially implies anything.) --fiesh [[Special:Contributions/91.43.222.42|91.43.222.42]] ([[User talk:91.43.222.42|talk]]) 23:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 
== Editor's note ==
 
I was reading the page, and in consulting the sources for the page noticed that the source for '''"Lecture Notes on Cryptography"''' '''is outdated'''. I don't have anything else to contribute just wanted to inform the lovely editors of this page. [[User:Zipore|Zipore]] ([[User talk:Zipore|talk]]) 19:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)