Content deleted Content added
→Proposed merge: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App talk reply |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
Please do not delete this information on an important programming language which is widely used. One may certainly imporve the article, however, letting it disappear in nirvana is not fair. I'm going to try ASAP. BTW I'm neither affiliated nor otherwise involved in this matter (just a user).
{{Old AfD multi |date1=12 February 2011 (UTC) |page1=Pure (programming language) |date2=27 February 2011 |page2=Pure (programming language) (2nd nomination) |date3=18 July 2024 |result3='''No consensus''' |page3=Pure (programming language) (3rd nomination)}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
Line 15 ⟶ 18:
:@[[User:Suriname0|Suriname0]] '''Oppose''' I think [[Prolog]] would be a better example to cite rather than Pure in the article on [[rewriting]]. Perhaps there are yet better examples. [[User:IntGrah|IntGrah]] ([[User talk:IntGrah|talk]]) 23:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:Suriname0|Suriname0]] Your proposal sounds good to me. But I'd agree with IntGrah that Prolog is a much better-known example, so I'd add it as another example rather than replacing existing ones. [[User:Adam Sampson|Adam Sampson]] ([[User talk:Adam Sampson|talk]]) 03:49, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
:Sorry for the late response. I'm fine with this. I'll redirect this page to [[rewriting]] and add a sentence about the Pure programming language. You are free to make amendments to what is said about the language in that article, but it appears that there's several opinions that all agree that this should no longer exist as a standalone article. [[User:HyperAccelerated|HyperAccelerated]] ([[User talk:HyperAccelerated|talk]]) 18:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
| |||