Content deleted Content added
Links |
→Engle and Granger 2-step approach: Demanded clarification Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3:
==History==
[[Udny Yule|Yule]] (1926) and [[Clive Granger|Granger]] and [[Paul Newbold|Newbold]] (1974) were the first to draw attention to the problem of [[spurious correlation]] and find solutions on how to address it in time series analysis.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Yule|first1=Georges Udny|title=Why do we sometimes get nonsense correlations between time series? – A study in sampling and the nature of time-series|journal=Journal of the Royal Statistical Society|date=1926|volume=89|issue=1|pages=1–63|doi=10.2307/2341482 |jstor=2341482 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |
Because of the stochastic nature of the trend it is not possible to break up integrated series into a deterministic (predictable) [[trend-stationary process|trend]] and a stationary series containing deviations from trend. Even in deterministically detrended [[random walk]]s spurious correlations will eventually emerge. Thus detrending does not solve the estimation problem.
Line 9:
In order to still use the [[Box–Jenkins|Box–Jenkins approach]], one could difference the series and then estimate models such as [[ARIMA]], given that many commonly used time series (e.g. in economics) appear to be stationary in first differences. Forecasts from such a model will still reflect cycles and seasonality that are present in the data. However, any information about long-run adjustments that the data in levels may contain is omitted and longer term forecasts will be unreliable.
This led [[John Denis Sargan|Sargan]] (1964) to develop the ECM methodology, which retains the level information.<ref>Sargan, J. D. (1964). "Wages and Prices in the United Kingdom: A Study in Econometric Methodology", 16, 25–54. in ''Econometric Analysis for National Economic Planning'', ed. by P. E. Hart, G. Mills, and J. N. Whittaker. London: Butterworths</ref><ref>{{cite journal |
==Estimation==
Several methods are known in the literature for estimating a refined dynamic model as described above. Among these are the [[Robert F. Engle|Engle]] and Granger 2-step approach, estimating their ECM in one step and the vector-based VECM using [[Johansen test|Johansen's method]].<ref>{{cite journal |
===Engle and Granger 2-step approach===
Line 21:
: <math> A(L) \, \Delta y_t = \gamma + B(L) \, \Delta x_t + \alpha (y_{t-1} -\beta_0 - \beta_1 x_{t-1} ) + \nu_t. </math>
[define A and B]
''If'' both variables are integrated and this ECM exists, they are cointegrated by the Engle–Granger representation theorem.
Line 58 ⟶ 60:
==Further reading==
* {{cite book |
* {{cite book |first=Walter |last=Enders |title=Applied Econometric Time Series |edition=Third |___location=New York |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |year=2010 |isbn=978-0-470-50539-7 |pages=272–355 }}
* {{cite book |last=Lütkepohl |first=Helmut |author-link=Helmut Lütkepohl |title=New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis |url=https://archive.org/details/newintroductiont00ltke |url-access=limited |___location=Berlin |publisher=Springer |year=2006 |isbn=978-3-540-26239-8 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/newintroductiont00ltke/page/n251 237]–352 }}
* {{cite book |
[[Category:Error detection and correction]]
|