Dialogue with Trypho: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Fixed grammar
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
Authenticity: this contradicts the sourced information above, whereas this is unsourced and not even in the right section
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2:
{{italic title}}
[[File:Justin Martyr.jpg|thumb|Justin Martyr]]
The '''''Dialogue with Trypho''''', alongis an extant second-century [[Christianity|Christian]] [[Christian apologetics|apologetic]] text by theologian [[Justin Martyr]]. Along with thehis [[First Apology of Justin Martyr|First]] and [[Second Apology of Justin Martyr|Second]] Apologies, it is a second-century [[Christianity|Christian]] [[Christian apologetics|apologetic]] text, usually agreed to be dated in between AD 155-160. It is seen as documenting the attempts by theologian [[Justin Martyr]] to show that Christianity is the new law for all men, and to prove from Scripture that Jesus is [[Messiah in Judaism|the Messiah]].<ref name=Ron48>''Reading the Old Testament with the Ancient Church: Exploring the Formation of Early Christian Thought''; by Ronald E. Heine (Sep 1, 2007) pages 48-52</ref>
 
The ''Dialogue'' utilizes the literary device of an intellectual conversation between Justin and Trypho, a [[Jews|Jew]]. The concluding section propounds that the Christians are the "true" people of [[God]].
Line 28:
==Authenticity==
{{Unreferenced section|date=May 2018}}
The ''Dialogue with Trypho'' and the two ''Apologies'' are universally accepted by scholars as authentic works of Justin. Though they are preserved only in the ''[[Sacra parallela]]'', they were known to [[Tatian]], [[Methodius of Olympus]], and [[Eusebius]] and their influence is traceable in [[Athenagoras of Athens|Athenagoras]], [[Theophilus of Antioch]], the Pseudo-Melito, and especially [[Tertullian]]. Eusebius speaks of two ''Apologies'', but he quotes them both as one, which indeed they are in substance. The identity of authorship is backed up not only by the reference in chapter 120 of the ''Dialogue'' to the ''Apology,'' but by the unity of treatment. Zahn showed that the ''Dialogue'' was originally divided into two books, that there is a considerable lacuna in chapter 74, as well as at the beginning, and that it is probably based on an actual occurrence at [[Ephesus]], the personality of the Rabbi [[Tarfon]] being employed, though in a Hellenized form.
 
==Editions==