Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data based decision making: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Data based decision making. |
→Data based decision making: Closed as soft delete (XFDcloser) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: var(--background-color-progressive-subtle, #F3F9FF); color: var(--color-base, inherit); margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-subtle, #AAAAAA);">
===[[:Data based decision making]]===▼
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:var(--color-error, red);">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''soft delete'''__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on [[WP:NOQUORUM|minimal participation]], this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired [[WP:PROD|PROD]] (a.k.a. [[WP:SOFTDELETE|"soft deletion"]]). Editors can <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Data based decision making}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data based decision making}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Data based decision making}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]</span>. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 09:19, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
▲===[[:Data based decision making]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Data based decision making}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data based decision making|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 November 23#{{anchorencode:Data based decision making}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1209274158/cur|edits since nomination]])
Line 7 ⟶ 12:
Doesn't appear notable. Referenced to a very small number of academic papers from the mid to late 2000s/early 2010s, but I cursory searches don't lead me to any significant use of the term in the context of education. Article seems to be largely structured based on the ideas of the Bernhardt reference. I would assume these ideas were salient around the passage and initial implementation of the No Child Let Behind Act and not much beyond that. Maybe reduce to a paragraph or two and merge into the article for the law? [[User:William Graham|William Graham]] <sup>[[User talk:William Graham|talk]]</sup> 06:58, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Education|list of Education-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:William Graham|William Graham]] <sup>[[User talk:William Graham|talk]]</sup> 06:58, 23 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' - it was a buzz phrase in the 2010s and has become a cliché by now, used exclusively at professional development workshops by education professors and principals, and [[WP:SIGCOV|still not covered in reliable secondary sources]]. An article about a rare eye disease might have that problem, and I’d still vote for keeping it, but this was just invented one day - and won’t go away. There’s a guy on Instagram that satirizes this sort of academic educationalese: "Find your rigor. Let’s take a deep dive into the data. What does [[Teacher quality assessment|Charlotte Danielson]] say?" [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 05:39, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||