|
__TOC__
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2025 JanuaryAugust 1527}}
= JanuaryAugust 1628 =
== 0003:1812, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 review of submission by 2601:401:C400:D800:9939:D1EB:EB02:2C54IanResearch ==
{{Lafc|username=2601:401:C400:D800:9939:D1EB:EB02:2C54IanResearch|ts=0003:1812, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025|draft=Draft:Royal_Oak_LeprechaunsZigZagZurich}}
Hi editors, just wanted to ask what I can do to improve my draft and write it in a way that is aligned with Wikipedia's guide and tone. Thank you! [[User:IanResearch|IanResearch]] ([[User talk:IanResearch|talk]]) 03:12, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
I've submitted this article several times but it has been rejected everytime. I need help. [[Special:Contributions/2601:401:C400:D800:9939:D1EB:EB02:2C54|2601:401:C400:D800:9939:D1EB:EB02:2C54]] ([[User talk:2601:401:C400:D800:9939:D1EB:EB02:2C54|talk]]) 00:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:The draft just tells of the offerings and activities of the company; a Wikipedia article must do more, it must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the [[WP:ORG|special Wikipedia definition of a notable company]].
:Have you read the reviewer comments in the draft? [[User:AlphaBetaGamma|ABG]] <small> ([[User talk:AlphaBetaGamma|Talk/Report any mistakes here]]) </small> 01:04, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:It'sThe beenawards declined,are notmeaningless rejected.towards establishing Rejectednotability; hasfor aan specificaward meaningto incontribute theto draft processnotability, thatit amust draftitself maymerit notan bearticle(like resubmitted.[[Nobel Peace DeclinedPrize]] meansor that[[Academy it may be resubmittedAward]]). [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 0806:2259, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 (UTC)
== 1105:1628, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 review of submission by WistahHoney508AndeHuang ==
{{Lafc|username=WistahHoney508AndeHuang|ts=1105:1628, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025|draft=Draft:Caitlin_McCarthy_(activist)Winmate Inc.}}
The draft has been declined multiple times. I have already revised the wording to make the tone more neutral, but it was still labeled as containing false information. Could you please review the draft and provide guidance on how to correct the issues and bring it in line with Wikipedia’s requirements? [[User:AndeHuang|AndeHuang]] ([[User talk:AndeHuang|talk]]) 05:28, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Hello, as a Wikipedia newbie re: creating articles, I would greatly appreciate help with the article for screenwriter Caitlin McCarthy. Is it possible to have the draft name changed from Caitlin McCarthy (activist) to Caitlin McCarthy (screenwriter)? Also, are there too many inline URLs in this article? Lastly, is there info that's more LinkedIn than Wikipedia? I've tried to make this Wikipedia ready but could use your expertise. Thank you! [[User:WistahHoney508|WistahHoney508]] ([[User talk:WistahHoney508|talk]]) 11:16, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:I don't see where anyone has said it contains false information, but it does say that it appears to have been written by an AI/LLM.
:The specific title of a draft is not particularly relevant. If accepted, the reviewer will place it at the proper title. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 11:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about a company and what it does, a Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:ORG|a notable company]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 06:56, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
== 1306:4840, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 review of submission by Csstaes109.252.122.222 ==
{{Lafc|username=Csstaes109.252.122.222|ts=1306:4840, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025|draft=Draft:Professor_Andrew_JonesMaxim_Lazarev}}
Good day!
The reviewer wrote, "There's a lot of information in here that either isn't supported by the sources, is a synthesis of published work that isn't actually what the sources say, or isn't sourced at all."
Thank you for your work!
I do not find this information helpful for polishing this article to Wikipedia standards. Below is the reference list for this article. I would appreciate it if the reviewer could indicate what information needs to be supported or is incorrectly supported so I can amend it. Thanks!
Help, as a professional, to correct this page, to work on it, so that it is acceptable for Wikipedia.
Reference list:
This is a famous Russian entomologist who studies the world fauna of longhorn beetles. For Wikipedia, such personalities are important, as for the world encyclopedia.
"Professor Andrew Jones appointed as Brunel's next Vice-Chancellor and President". Brunel University London. Brunel University Press Office. 1 October 2021. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
Help improve this page.
Jones, Andrew M. (3 November 2003). Management Consultancy and Banking in an Era of Globalization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 225.
Maybe it should be shortened, and leave some small extract? Until new sources.
Jones, Andrew M. (31 July 2006). Dictionary of Globalization. Cambridge: Polity. p. 258.
With respect. [[Special:Contributions/109.252.122.222|109.252.122.222]] ([[User talk:109.252.122.222|talk]]) 06:40, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Jones, Andrew M. (26 June 2010). Globalization: Key Thinkers. Cambridge: Polity. p. 275.
"Andrew Jones – Academic Profile". City, University of London. 31 January 2020. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
Jones, Andrew; Ström, Patrik, eds. (2023). Handbook of Research on the Green Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
"Board of Trustees". London Higher. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
"Professor Andrew Jones". Universities UK. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
"Members of the Board of Trustees". Campaign for Science and Engineering. Retrieved 22 November 2024. [[User:Csstaes|Csstaes]] ([[User talk:Csstaes|talk]]) 13:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{u|Csstaes}} The best way to address the reviewer directly is on their user talk page, click the word "talk" next to their username in the decline message. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:Just looking at the list of references above, it does not appear to me that ''a single one'' of them meets the triple criteria of being reliable, independent, and containing significant coverage of Jones - in fact, it does n't look to me as if any of them meet even the first two criteria. (see [[WP:42]]).
:{{HD/WINI}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 15:41, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
== 13:50, 16 January 2025 review of submission by Toblerone101 ==
{{Lafc|username=Toblerone101|ts=13:50, 16 January 2025|draft=Draft:Shelly_Brawl_stars}}
What exactly should I add because I will gladly add it [[User:Toblerone101|TobyB]] ([[User talk:Toblerone101|talk]]) 13:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:YourThe draft ishas completelybeen unsourced.rejected, meaning Anthat articleit mustwill summarizenot whatbe independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] say about theconsidered subjectfurther. It'sIf bettersomething ifchanges you havein the sourcesfuture, inyou handare before attemptingwelcome to write,edit notthe lookdraft forand sourcesthen afterappeal to the fact(seerejecting [[WP:BACKWARD]])reviewer. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 1306:5253, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 (UTC)
== 1408:4437, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 review of submission by AssociatteCasa Coto ==
{{Lafc|username=AssociatteCasa Coto|ts=1408:4437, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025|draft=Draft:Us_Against_YouOtto Bihler Maschinenfabrik}}
Hello Wikipedians, I'm kindly asking for advice. Many months ago, I created a draft on the Bihler company ([[Draft:Otto Bihler Maschinenfabrik]]). It has since been declined multiple times, but I don't quite understand why. It is said that [[WP:NCORP]] is not met. However, in that draft, I have demonstrated, using a source assessment table, why I believe that the Bihler company has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. I know that not every source that I have cited falls within the [[WP:SIRS]] criteria, but still, I feel that, the number of sources that do, is sufficient. It would be very helpful to have a second thought on this. Any advice is very much appreciated. Thank you! @ [[User:Novem Linguae]]. -- [[User:Casa Coto|Casa Coto]] ([[User talk:Casa Coto|talk]]) 08:37, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Hello! Good morning to whoever I may be talking to.
Beartown, the book, already has a Wikipedia page and I noticed its sequel doesn't. So I tried to add. But I've never done this before, and I want to make sure everything is alright. I mean, I thought I could add the official synopsis if I gave it the reference, but apparently, I could not. I'm sorry for the trouble with that.
But how can I make sure my draft is alright? [[User:Associatte|Associatte]] ([[User talk:Associatte|talk]]) 14:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:I haven't done a detailed analysis yet, but if other reviewers are still declining it, maybe your source assessment table is being too generous. Do all your sources have 3 meaty paragraphs of detail about the company? Are they independent (i.e. no press releases disguised as articles, no articles that are mostly quotations, no [[advertorials]], etc)? Is at least one of the sources regional, national, or international? These are all things needed to pass [[WP:NCORP]] and [[WP:GNG]]. See also [[User:Novem Linguae/Essays/Nuances of GNG]] and [[User:Novem Linguae/Essays/Novem's words of wisdom]] #6. It's been 2 months since you submitted this... if you think it passes, maybe submit it again and add a comment asking for detailed source feedback in the event of a decline. Hope this helps. Good luck. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 13:52, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
:A book must be shown to meet the [[WP:NBOOK|special Wikipedia definition of a notable book]]. Usually that is done by summarizing some reviews of the book written by professional reviewers. Your draft article does little more than document the existence of the book. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:21, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:cc {{u|Casa Coto}}. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 13:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
:Comments on your assessment table:
:* You list the Hesse source as secondary, but describe it as an encyclopedia. That means it's a tertiary source.
:* You assess four sources in total to meet the criteria of reliable, independent, and significant coverage. Those would be good sources, but...
:* it isn't clear that they provide significant coverage of the company, its products, the punch-bending process, or Otto Bihler himself. Those are four different topics, and this draft is about ''one'' topic. For example, the Kolbe source discusses the technology and how the machine works, but what about the company, which is the topic of this draft?
:The assessment table is a great start, but reading it only brings up more questions. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 15:16, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
::<small>Quick note that in my experience, tertiary sources are usually accepted as counting towards GNG. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 15:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)</small>
:::<small>I wasn't saying that they aren't acceptable, although our policies recommend using them more to assess due weight. I was just pointing out an error in the table. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 16:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)</small>
== 1512:4611, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 review of submission by 4178.81150.12201.169201 ==
{{Lafc|username=4178.81150.12201.169201|ts=1512:4611, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025|draft=Draft:SMARTBOY_MANAGEMENT_(label)Fusion_candle}}
WhyBecause isI mycannot articlefind beingany saidmore thatreferences itto containsfusion a copyright?candles [[Special:Contributions/4178.81150.12201.169201|4178.81150.12201.169201]] ([[User talk:4178.81150.12201.169201|talk]]) 1512:4611, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 (UTC)
:Then this topic doesn't merit an article at this time. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:20, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
:As noted in the report linked on the draft page, because your article is mostly written by copying text from Kenyan Vibe [https://www.kenyanvibe.com/inside-the-viral-hit-calendar-ya-mungu/]. That violates both our policies and copyright law. [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] ([[User talk:CoffeeCrumbs|talk]]) 15:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
== 1714:3157, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 review of submission by Susko3Aras2025 ==
{{Lafc|username=Susko3Aras2025|ts=1714:3157, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025|draft=UserDraft:Susko3/sandboxRadio_Duhok}}
Hello,
I would like to write and article about CircusP, and have a draft in my user sandbox. But before I move it to the <code>Draft:</code> namespace and submit for review, I would like to check if my situation constitutes a [[WP:COI]].
My draft, "Draft:Radio Duhok," has been declined multiple times due to a lack of "in-depth coverage" from reliable, independent sources, according to the last reviewer.
I am a volunteer livestream chat moderator (similar to [[Internet_forum#Moderators]], mostly deleting spam) on CircusP's [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbqqGrk6R24GUb9aPTqvqVw YouTube] and [https://www.twitch.tv/Circus_P Twitch] channels. I don't have any relationship with the subject beyond that. Please let me know if that considered a COI that I should disclose on my user page. Thanks, [[User:Susko3|Susko3]] ([[User talk:Susko3|talk]]) 17:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
I have tried my best to find good sources and have included:
:Yes, since you volunteer on their YouTube, you are associated with them. Simply list the COI on your user page. [[User:Ktkvtsh|Ktkvtsh]] ([[User talk:Ktkvtsh|talk]]) 21:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
1. Two official announcements from the Duhok Governorate's website congratulating the radio on its anniversary.
2. A feature article about the radio in the well-known regional "Gulan Magazine" (Issue 829, 2010), which refers to it as the "authentic voice of the governorate."
Could an experienced editor please take a look at these sources and provide some feedback? I am struggling to understand why these are considered insufficient for notability. Specifically, I would like to know if the Gulan Magazine article is just a "brief mention" and what an example of an "in-depth" source would look like for a subject like this.
== 17:37, 16 January 2025 review of submission by Oseikhe ==
{{Lafc|username=Oseikhe|ts=17:37, 16 January 2025|draft=Draft:Miriam Mattova}}
Please help, why was this article rejected, to my own understanding reliable sources were attributed . And what does secondary sources mean. [[User:Oseikhe|Oseikhe]] ([[User talk:Oseikhe|talk]]) 17:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:AndAny alsoguidance Iwould need assistance and guidancebe ingreatly understandingappreciated. ArticleThank creationyou. [[User:OseikheAras2025|OseikheAras2025]] ([[User talk:OseikheAras2025|talk]]) 1714:4057, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 (UTC)
::{{ping|Oseikhe}} Refer to my /Decode subpage (linked in my signature as "critiques"):
::* We can't use https://iconmodels.ca/photoset.php?id=72177720317623594 ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Photo gallery; nothing ''to'' cite.
::* We can't use https://sita.sk/miriam-mattova-dolezita-je-vnutorna-i-vonkajsia-krasa/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]], [[WP:PRIMARY|connexion to subject]]). Very short article which is basically an abortive attempt at a prose interview.
::* We can't use https://www.universalqueen.com/2012/03/meet-delegates-of-miss-slovensko-2012.html?m=1 ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Photo gallery with a lede that says nothing about her.
::* We can't use https://www.joj.sk/miss/foto/1251-miriam-mattova-na-miss-bikini-2013/dalsie ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Photo gallery; nothing ''to'' cite.
::* https://bazaarvietnam.vn/miriam-mattova-fashion-icon-and-social-activist-how-an-extensive-education-shapes-her-advocacy/ is useless for notability ([[WP:PRIMARY|connexion to subject]]). Interview.
::* We can't use https://www.moevir.com/fashions/miriam-mattova ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Yet another photo gallery with nothing to cite.
::Only one of your sources is remotely usable, and even that is not third-party. We are looking for [[WP:Reliable sources|in-depth, non-routine, independent-of-Mattova news/scholarly sources that discuss her at length and have been subjected to rigourous fact-checking and editorial oversight]]. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 17:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:Oseikhe|Oseikhe]]. This sort of experience is common when new editors plunge straight into the challenging task of creating an article before spending time learning how Wikipedia works. Would you enter a tennis tournament when you only played your first ever game last week?
:{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 23:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:An in depth source will, on its own, go into detail about the topic and discuss what they see as important/significant/influential about it- what makes it [[WP:N|notable]]. Mere congratulations and a mention do not qualify. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:01, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
== 20:41, 16 January 2025 review of submission by Ktkvtsh ==
:The English Wikipedia tends to be stricter than other language versions; I don't know if this content would be acceptable on the Arabic Wikipedia, which has its own policies. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:03, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=Ktkvtsh|ts=20:41, 16 January 2025|draft=Draft:Pastor Elleson}}
[[User:Macbook01]] has removed my AfC decline from the draft as well as others. I'm not sure how to get them all back onto the draft properly. [[User:Ktkvtsh|Ktkvtsh]] ([[User talk:Ktkvtsh|talk]]) 20:41, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
== 16:50, 28 August 2025 review of submission by Saysky2 ==
:oh am I suppose to keep the top?
{{Lafc|username=Saysky2|ts=16:50, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Ajay_Taneja}}
:sorry. [[User:Macbook01|Macbook01]] ([[User talk:Macbook01|talk]]) 20:46, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
may i know the reason why the article has been stoped
::Yes. [[User:Ktkvtsh|Ktkvtsh]] ([[User talk:Ktkvtsh|talk]]) 20:47, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
[[User:Saysky2|Saysky2]] ([[User talk:Saysky2|talk]]) 16:50, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
:::not sure where to put your decline back on.
:::It was about stacking citations at the end. [[User:Macbook01|Macbook01]] ([[User talk:Macbook01|talk]]) 20:49, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
::::@[[User:KylieTastic|KylieTastic]], is this something you could assist with? [[User:Ktkvtsh|Ktkvtsh]] ([[User talk:Ktkvtsh|talk]]) 20:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::@[[User:Ktkvtsh|Ktkvtsh]] done [[User:KylieTastic|KylieTastic]] ([[User talk:KylieTastic|talk]]) 20:56, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::Much thanks. [[User:Ktkvtsh|Ktkvtsh]] ([[User talk:Ktkvtsh|talk]]) 20:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:::I've edited it about a dozen times now to refine each fact I wrote. How's it look to you? [[User:Macbook01|Macbook01]] ([[User talk:Macbook01|talk]]) 20:49, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
::::Now that it is fixed, please only edit the draft below all of the reviews. Thanks! You can always ask for clarification if you get confused. [[User:Ktkvtsh|Ktkvtsh]] ([[User talk:Ktkvtsh|talk]]) 21:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::Okay, thank you!
:::::How's the article look? [[User:Macbook01|Macbook01]] ([[User talk:Macbook01|talk]]) 21:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::I only review drafts one time. Another reviewer will take a look at it for you. [[User:Ktkvtsh|Ktkvtsh]] ([[User talk:Ktkvtsh|talk]]) 21:12, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
== 2017:4810, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 review of submission by Scottlinehan1999Saysky2 ==
{{Lafc|username=Scottlinehan1999Saysky2|ts=2017:4810, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025|draft=Draft:List_of_Chelsea_F._C_players_chronologicallyAjay Taneja}}
How canMay i getknow the pageexact toreason beof acceptedrejecting the article. IEven basedi thehad listasked offweather thei Frenchcan internationaluse rugbynewspapers playerscuts listas whichreliable sources or not as in 2000s no digital media was acceptedthere andno iany haveanswered to itmy sourcedquestion. WhatsThis thei really disgusting no supports problem. [[User:Scottlinehan1999Saysky2|Scottlinehan1999Saysky2]] ([[User talk:Scottlinehan1999Saysky2|talk]]) 2017:4810, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 (UTC)
:'''This draft has been rejected [[WP:IDHT|for failing to heed previous criticism]] and will not be considered further.''' The reviewers explained a fair bit in their comments, and the draft was rejected once it became clear you were blowing them off. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 17:13, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
:The French Wikipedia is a separate project, with its own editors and policies. What is acceptable there is not necessarily acceptable on another Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia tends to be stricter than others. Please see the note left by the reviewer, the draft fails [[WP:NLIST]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 20:56, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
::{{ping|Saysky2}} <small>re-signing to fix ping</small> —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 17:14, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
:You have three non-independent sources, and one which might be independent, but gives a 404 when I look at it. (Even if it is both independent and gives substantial coverage, one source is not enough).
:{{HD/WINI}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 15:58, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
== 2118:3110, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 review of submission by CLWwrites80.41.119.0 ==
{{Lafc|username=CLWwrites80.41.119.0|ts=2118:3110, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025|draft=Draft:Andy_WinterFusion_candle}}
please dont remove my draft when i send it to you even if its rubbish [[Special:Contributions/80.41.119.0|80.41.119.0]] ([[User talk:80.41.119.0|talk]]) 18:10, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
My article was initially declined because I needed to change the writing style and references. I fixed those and submitted it. Another couple of rounds of changes which I did and submitted. When I resubmitted today, I was told I cannot resubmit, so I'm a little confused. [[User:CLWwrites|CLWwrites]] ([[User talk:CLWwrites|talk]]) 21:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:IDon't amwaste curious,reviewer havetime youwith usedrubbish. We don't accept AI-generated articles, period. It has been deleted. If you want to submit an article on that topic, you must write thisit in your own words and cite actual reliable page?sources. ~[[User:KtkvtshAnachronist|KtkvtshAnachronist]] <small>([[User talk:KtkvtshAnachronist|talk]])</small> 2118:3519, 1628 JanuaryAugust 2025 (UTC)
::Oh my goodness, of course not. [[User:CLWwrites|CLWwrites]] ([[User talk:CLWwrites|talk]]) 02:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:You cannot seriously think it is suitable for an encyclopaedia? It's possibly the worst paid draft I have ever reviewed. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 22:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
::You've made your point clear many times [[User:CLWwrites|CLWwrites]] ([[User talk:CLWwrites|talk]]) 02:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:CLWwrites|CLWwrites]]. As you may have worked out, writing for an encyclopaedia such as Wikipedia is different from most other kinds of writing. A very very short guide to writing a successful article:
:# Find several sources that are [[WP:42|reliable, wholly independent of the subject, and contain significant coverage of the subject]]. Ignore anything on social media, anything written, published, or commissioned by the subject or their associates, or based on their words (such as interviews and press releases). Ignore anything with less than a couple of paragraphs about the subject specifically (as opposed to, for example, his business).
:# If you have not found a minimum of three such sources, give up: you will be wasting your own and anybody else's time continuing to work on this
:# If you have, ''forget every single thing you know about the subject'' and write a [[WP:NPOV|neutral]] summary of what those sources say.
:Congratulations. You now have an acceptable article, which you or others may be able to add to.
:{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 23:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
::TL;DR - Please spend some time doing basic edits before starting a draft.
::You '''really''' want to find at least [[WP:THREE|three reliable and independent sources covering the subject in some depth]] '''before''' starting a draft/article. [[WP:BACKWARD|doing this in the wrong order makes everything painful]].
:: [[User:AlphaBetaGamma|ABG]] <small> ([[User talk:AlphaBetaGamma|Talk/Report any mistakes here]]) </small> 01:08, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:::I thought I had 3 reliable and independent sources as they were newspapers. Yes, it's been a painful exercise. [[User:CLWwrites|CLWwrites]] ([[User talk:CLWwrites|talk]]) 02:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you...a kind and helpful response, I so appreciate that. I realize it's a different style of writing but I thought I had enough independent sources. I'll look at it again. Another reviewer recommended that I needed releases from the photographer for the photos I had added, even though it was likely a staff member or his wife were the photographers, so I just removed the photos. They were from his private photo collection. So you're suggesting that I edit other articles? Thank you again. It's been quite a journey. [[User:CLWwrites|CLWwrites]] ([[User talk:CLWwrites|talk]]) 02:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
::Hoping this reply finds you...it isn't displaying under your comment. Thank you very much for being so helpful. [[User:CLWwrites|CLWwrites]] ([[User talk:CLWwrites|talk]]) 02:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Hello, @[[User:CLWwrites|CLWwrites]]. Thank you for taking the feedback graciously. Yes, I strongly recommend that you edit other articles, and learn that way about how we do things.
:::Images will not affect whether a draft is accepted or not, so I suggest forgetting about them for the time being. In order to use them eventually, you will need the copyright holders (most likely the photographers) to agree to follow the procedure in [[WP:donating copyright materials]].
:::I haven't looked at your sources, as you haven't linked to them (you are under no obligation to do so - and of course some sources may be offline anyway - but it makes the reviewer's talk easier if you do), but judging from the titles it doesn't sound as if many of them have in-depth coverage of Winter. They might even be enough to make his business [[WP:NCORP|notable]] even if he isn't. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 13:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
::::Your feedback was a fresh response to one of the first reviewers who said it was the worst article they had ever read and I should refund any money I received. That was a little distressing, let me tell you, so your feedback was refreshing - it was helpful. There are 7 newspapers referenced. Yes, they are mostly about Saint Cinnamon coming to other countries but The Toronto Star is a big one about him. The award for the fastest growing QSR Quick Serve Restaurant was him. Most of the newspapers are not online. I reached out to the publishers, even The Toronto Star article is archived and if I use the link it sends you to a library and you need to set up an account to view it, so I wasn't sure if that would be a good practice. His poem was accepted into the Kennedy Accessions Library and through my inquiry to them, they updated it to be online.
::::So thank you. His business is notable. Over 200 locations globally is quite an accomplishment and he changed how the industry did things.
::::I will look to other articles and edit a few. [[User:CLWwrites|CLWwrites]] ([[User talk:CLWwrites|talk]]) 14:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
== 18:26, 28 August 2025 review of submission by SindhuG2025 ==
= January 17 =
{{Lafc|username=SindhuG2025|ts=18:26, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Aligireddy_Kasi_Vishwanath_Reddy}}
Hello team,
I have submitted an article on an Indian agriculturist AligiReddy Vishwanath Reddy but the article has been declined. Could you please assist me in improving the article. [[User:SindhuG2025|SindhuG2025]] ([[User talk:SindhuG2025|talk]]) 18:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
:[[User:SindhuG2025|SindhuG2025]] it seems like no one has declined the article. When you created the page you included a 'decline' banner in the page. I've fixed it for you.
== 01:14, 17 January 2025 review of submission by AdrianaStanzione ==
:In its current state, the article would not be accepted. In addition to a lack of inline citations to support the claims made in the article, the article seems like it was written for the express purpose of promoting the subject rather than to be encyclopedic.
{{Lafc|username=AdrianaStanzione|ts=01:14, 17 January 2025|draft=Draft:Mrs._Henry_(band)}}
My:Also, article was declinedit's duebest to reliabilityavoid issues,external andlinks Iin was wonderingthe wherebody specificallyof this applied throughout thean article, sounless Inecessary. canSee fixthe it?page [[WP:External links]]. [[User:AdrianaStanzioneSungodtemple|AdrianaStanzioneSungodtemple]] ([[User talk:AdrianaStanzioneSungodtemple|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sungodtemple|contribs]]) 0104:1424, 1729 JanuaryAugust 2025 (UTC)
:Those blank decline templates are made up by ChatGPT and the like. [[User:Sarsenet|Sarsenet]]•<small>he/they</small>•([[User talk:Sarsenet|talk]]) 04:33, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
== 19:01, 28 August 2025 review of submission by RavenFireblade ==
:Hello, @[[User:AdrianaStanzione|AdrianaStanzione]]. I am not a reviewer, and I haven't looked closely at your draft or your sources. What I will say is that "reliability" is not a property of text, but of sources - whether they are published by somebody with a reputation for editorial control and fact checking or not; and that when the boilerplate comments that reviewers leave talk about "reliability" of sources, they often refer as much to the ''independence'' of sources. {{HD/WINI}}
{{Lafc|username=RavenFireblade|ts=19:01, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Jack_Logan}}
:Sources that are going to be used to establish notability need to meet all three of the criteria in [[WP:42]]. Interviews, and pieces based on press releases, don't do this. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 15:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
We have edited the article along with new, reliable, independent sources. Please help us improve it. Thank you! [[User:RavenFireblade|RavenFireblade]] ([[User talk:RavenFireblade|talk]]) 19:01, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
:Hi @[[User:RavenFireblade|RavenFireblade]]. Who is "we" and "us"? <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 20:01, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
== 02:20, 17 January 2025 review of submission by Jackson Teiratop ==
::{{reply to|RavenFireblade|Qcne|Kalaboomsky|Athaenara|SoWhy|Bearcat|MWFwiki}} back in August 2018 at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Santos]], {{User5|User=Kalaboomsky}} wrote "Just tell '''us''' what needs to be removed or questionable areas on the article that needs removing" [[Special:Diff/855337532|here]]. It would appear to me that [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jack Logan Show]] back in 2018 may possibly also be relevant here. All that said, [[:Jack Logan (filmmaker)]] is now a mainspace article: any windmills I chose to joust here in 2025 may [[:2018|seven years too late]], I guess. [[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 🦘 11:03, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=Jackson Teiratop|ts=02:20, 17 January 2025|draft=User:Jackson_Teiratop/sandbox}}
:::I was the approver. For what it is worth, this was a borderline pass. I felt the subject ''just'' meets notability, especially when considering [[WP:NOTLEVEL]] (I realize this is not a policy). However, even keeping the COI in-mind (and I have a feeling the disclosed COI may be a "sacrificial lamb" disclosure, and the actual COI may be deeper... But, AGF and all that) I feel that the article was ready for mainspace. Particularly with the additional COI labelling. Anyways, I am of the opinion that we have enough notability to push us over the edge, and that any further discussion regarding the article should take place via AfD. I would abstain from such a discussion. '''[[User:MWFwiki|MWFwiki]]''' ([[User talk:MWFwiki|talk]]) 20:42, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Why did my article get rejected????
[[User:Jackson Teiratop|Jackson Teiratop]] ([[User talk:Jackson Teiratop|talk]]) 02:20, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
= August 29 =
:There are no sources to verify the claims made. [[User:Ktkvtsh|Ktkvtsh]] ([[User talk:Ktkvtsh|talk]]) 02:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:Jackson Teiratop|Jackson Teiratop]]. A Wikipedia article should be a summary of what [[WP:42|reliable, independent sources]] say about a subject, and very little else. If you don't cite any sources, then you have no article. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 13:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
== 0301:2429, 1729 JanuaryAugust 2025 review of submission by Afsal8943Hyperbolick ==
{{Lafc|username=Afsal8943Hyperbolick|ts=0301:2429, 1729 JanuaryAugust 2025|draft=UserDraft:Afsal8943/sandboxJimmy "Ninja" Chaikong}}
I am confessedly not entirely objective on this because Jimmy was a longtime acquaintance.
please advice us to solve this [[User:Afsal8943|Afsal8943]] ([[User talk:Afsal8943|talk]]) 03:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
He drowned in a boating accident this weekend. Had one of those quirky lives where he did many different things, MMA fighting, recording music, winning [[American Gladiator]], publishing philosophy, managing the Texas Songwriting Championship. He was a guest menace in a few episodes of [[Burn Notice]] (no media source for that, but he posted it on his socials and if you watch the episodes you can see him plain as day). His death was reported more than anything else in his life, but it was quite a life. [[User:Hyperbolick|Hyperbolick]] ([[User talk:Hyperbolick|talk]]) 01:29, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:{{HD/WINI}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 13:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:Do you have a specific question about the draft? [[user:Notcharizard|<span style="color:#70A67A">-- NotC</span><span style="color:#396340">hariza</span><span style="color:#0D2311">rd</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Notcharizard|<span style="color:#0D2311">🗨</span>]]</sup> 06:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
please advice us [[User:Afsal8943|Afsal8943]] ([[User talk:Afsal8943|talk]]) 03:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:: Yes, does Jimmy's eclectic set of points of notability add up to actual notability? Could probably find a few more sources touching on a few more points (he was a high school gymnastics champ and an FAU cheerleader before going to Oklahoma), but this is close to being what there is. [[User:Hyperbolick|Hyperbolick]] ([[User talk:Hyperbolick|talk]]) 06:47, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:This reads like an [[WP:SPAM|investor brochure]], and [[WP:PAID|you are obligated to '''''DISCLOSE YOUR EMPLOYMENT''''']] per our Terms of Use. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 06:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:Hyperbolick|Hyperbolick]]. [[WP:Notability|Notability]], as Wikipedia uses the word, is not about what the subject is, or does, or has done, but about whether enought independent material has been reliably published ''about'' the subject to base an article on. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 10:11, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
== How to add extra references which helps draft will go for mainspace. ==
== 15:02, 17 January 2025 review of submission by 151.95.147.68 ==
{{Lafc|username=151.95.147.68|ts=15:02, 17 January 2025|draft=Draft:Finestre_sull'Arte}}
Dear Moderators,
hello ! Help on article [[Draft:Tanka Timilsina]] ! Please improve and take this article to mainspace.i will be very thankful for your kindness. [[User:MountainWriter42|MountainWriter42]] ([[User talk:MountainWriter42|talk]]) 10:48, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
I am writing to seek guidance regarding the repeated rejection of the English version of the Wikipedia page for Finestre sull'Arte. Despite my efforts to address the feedback provided by integrating additional sources, the page continues to be declined with the explanation:
:Hello, @[[User:MountainWriter42|MountainWriter42]]. Wikipedia is a volunteer project, where people work on what they choose. It is unlikely - not impossible, but unlikely - that anybody will decide to work on your draft just because you ask.
"This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources."
:It is possible (no more than that) that if you asked at [[WP:WikiProject Music|WikiProject Music]] or [[WP:WikiProject Nepal|WikiProject Nepal]] you might find somebody interested enough to work on it. But don't set your hopes too high. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 16:05, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:YouTube, press releases and interviews are not reliable independent sources. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 17:56, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
I wish to highlight that the same page, based on identical content and sources, has been approved in other languages, as demonstrated by the following links:
== 11:32, 29 August 2025 review of submission by Newacctowork ==
Italian: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finestre_sull%27Arte
{{Lafc|username=Newacctowork|ts=11:32, 29 August 2025|draft=Draft:Trinity_Private_School}}
German: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finestre_sull%E2%80%99Arte
I am requesting assistance with my draft article Draft:Trinity_Private_School. Each word of the text was written manually without the use of AI tools. However, three times I received feedback that the draft was written by AI. I respectfully emphasize that I wrote the article myself, and therefore I ask you to indicate exactly which sentences or parts appear to you as AI-generated.
Spanish: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finestre_sull%27Arte
In addition, I was told that my sources are “not relevant.” Could you please clarify how relevance is determined? For example, [[The Heritage Private School]] article was accepted with only one source, while my draft contains 17 independent sources, yet it has not passed review.
French: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finestre_sull%27Arte
Finally, the article cannot be considered promotional, because it contains no evaluative or laudatory language. I removed all subjective judgments and left only verifiable, encyclopedic content supported by citations.
Given this context, I would appreciate your advice on how to make the English version compliant with the requirements for reliable sources. Are there specific types of references or additional details that I should prioritize?
I would greatly appreciate clear feedback on what exactly prevents the draft from being accepted and what specific improvements are required. [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 11:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]]: you will note that the most recent decline, by me, was not for AI but for promotionality and lack of any evidence of [[WP:notability|notability]].
Thank you in advance for your assistance. I look forward to your guidance.
:You then resubmitted the draft without any attempt at addressing those reasons. Why did you do that? Are you disputing my review, or did you think if you keep submitting it will eventually go through by brute force? You only have finite number of chances, so I would suggest you make the most of them.
Best regards,
:And yes, [[The Heritage Private School]] is even weaker in terms of sourcing (in that, it has none), and I have tagged it accordingly. That doesn't mean we should create more insufficiently sourced articles, though. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 12:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/151.95.147.68|151.95.147.68]] ([[User talk:151.95.147.68|talk]]) 15:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] No, I submitted it by accident. Could you please clarify what exactly needs to be fixed? I have already removed most of the adjectives that could make the text appear promotional. What further steps should I take? How can I rewrite it so that it reads as neutral, rather than advertising? [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 12:26, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]]: you're normally meant to summarise what the sources say. But on this occasion, those sources are just churnalism etc., therefore summarising them will only ever result in a promotional draft. So you should go back to square one and look for sources that are entirely independent of the subject (meaning no interviews, press releases, advertorials, sponsored content, etc.) and base your draft on them. Personally, I doubt you will find such sources, but nothing to stop you trying. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 12:40, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
::::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] There is a category, [[:Category:International schools in Cyprus]]. Could you provide an example? From my perspective, I do not see any pages there that match what you are describing. At the moment, all the pages appear to be in the main space. [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 12:51, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:::::@[[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]]: don't concern yourself with any other articles that may exist, we're talking about whether ''your'' draft can be accepted; [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]] is invariably a red herring.
:::::The long and short of it is that the vast majority of schools are not notable enough to justify an article. At two years old, this school is basically a startup, and the vast majority of startups are likewise not notable. Any media coverage that may exist is therefore almost by definition likely to originate in the school's marketing team, as is clearly the case with the sources cited in this draft. If the school was a major new initiative or an attempt at educational reform by the gov't of Cyprus, there might be independent mainstream media coverage of it, but here we're talking about a niche private school for a particular group of expats. As I said, you're welcome to search for better sources, but I wouldn't hold my breath. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:01, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
::::::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] "No, we are just talking about other articles. When I take another article as a reference, I see that it has far fewer sources than mine, yet it passed. Can this be considered a biased approach? What does the marketing team have to do with it, if there is no link to any commercial offer and not a single word about cost? This is exactly what concerns me: does it comply with Wikipedia rules that a school without media coverage is published, while a school with coverage is not? For Cyprus, these media are public and authoritative. For comparison, my house has also stood since 1987. There are no publications about it — can I publish an article about it without coverage, as others did? [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 13:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:::::::@[[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]]: no, you cannot {{tq|"publish an article about it without coverage"}}. Your draft's subject must meet our notability requirements, which it has not yet demonstrated.
:::::::If you've found existing articles which also fall short of the standards required, you're very welcome to improve them, or to commence deletion proceedings ([[WP:AFD]] is that-a-way) if that's not possible. But just because such articles exist, is no reason to create more such problems. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:26, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
::::::::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] L’Officiel Cyprus, Cyprus Times, and Boussias News (in Greek) - are these not considered reliable sources? Could you please explain the definition and criteria of reliability in this case? These outlets are public and widely recognized in Cyprus. There is no 'churnalism' here, as you described earlier, and no interviews with the school itself. What exactly is wrong with these sources? [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 13:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::I will note that just because another article exists does not necessarily mean it was "approved" by anyone. There are many reasons this could be, and that cannot justify adding more inappropriate articles. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:56, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::Are you connected to this school in some way? [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::@[[User:331dot|331dot]] Absolutely not. I just saw an article on the Internet and decided to create an entry about them, since I am from Ukraine myself. [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 14:09, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
== 12:00, 29 August 2025 review of submission by GeorgeHav ==
:There is quite a lot of unreferenced information in this draft, and much of the content is supported only by the publication's own website.
{{Lafc|username=GeorgeHav|ts=12:00, 29 August 2025|draft=Draft:FlightSimExpo}}
:Whether an article on this subject exists in other language versions of Wikipedia is immaterial, as each version is a separate project with its own policies and requirements. To be accepted into the English-language Wikipedia, an article must meet our referencing and notability etc. standards (which, to be fair, are higher than those of other versions that I'm aware of). -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Article was denied for npov, but I'm not sure i can personally see specifically where/why that's the case? Any thoughts on how I could improve that? [[User:GeorgeHav|GeorgeHav]] ([[User talk:GeorgeHav|talk]]) 12:00, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:Hello. The first point is that each language version of Wikipedia is a separate project, with its own rules and procedures: what is acceptable in one may not be in others - and the English Wikipedia is said to have one of the strictest regimes for accepting new articles.
:Secondly, as far as English Wikipedia is concerned, {{HD/WINI}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 15:12, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
::I find it incredibly hard to believe this-- "<u>Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources.</u>". Who goes through all the data and randomly decides what people they'd like to do an article about. For free no less. We all know that stars have publicists who likely pay to ensure their artists are thoroughly included here. Also, side note: the reviewers have all the charm as an over worked DMV employee. [[User:Almonday|Almonday]] ([[User talk:Almonday|talk]]) 04:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::You may find it hard to believe, but we don't - because we're the ones ''doing'' all that work for free. Everyone you've talked to is a volunteer editor. We all write articles about subjects we have no connection with. -- [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 05:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:All the draft does is document occurrences of this event- in essence, promoting them. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
== 15:32, 17 January 2025 review of submission by Infomdzakaria ==
::Interesting, what would you recommend then in this case? Adding a section on "Reception"? [[User:GeorgeHav|GeorgeHav]] ([[User talk:GeorgeHav|talk]]) 23:11, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=Infomdzakaria|ts=15:32, 17 January 2025|draft=Draft:Elias_Hossain_(journalist)}}
:::I would talk much less about occurrences of the event and much more about what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] say about it. You meed to show that it is [[WP:NEVENT|a notable event]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 23:18, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
as per your instruction i have completed all the references relating to the artile, pls allow me to submit again
::::Awesome, thanks for the advice. [[User:InfomdzakariaGeorgeHav|InfomdzakariaGeorgeHav]] ([[User talk:InfomdzakariaGeorgeHav|talk]]) 1523:3219, 1729 JanuaryAugust 2025 (UTC)
:YouTube and Facebook are NOT reliable sources. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 15:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
== 1513:5302, 1729 JanuaryAugust 2025 review of submission by Macbook01Vaibhav9786 ==
{{Lafc|username=Macbook01Vaibhav9786|ts=1513:5302, 1729 JanuaryAugust 2025|draft=Draft:John_EllesonReason for Article Rejection}}
Could you please let me know why my article was rejected. Just wanted to get an understanding so I do not make the same mistakes again [[User:Vaibhav9786|Vaibhav9786]] ([[User talk:Vaibhav9786|talk]]) 13:02, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Let me comb through more articles and resubmit. don't block the submission.
people were not allowing it and giving no comment on it... [[User:Macbook01|Macbook01]] ([[User talk:Macbook01|talk]]) 15:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:With 6 declines and a final rejection it's probably time to [[WP:DROPTHESTICK]]. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 15:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{courtesy link|Draft:Virtual CFO Services in India}}
== 16:03, 17 January 2025 review of submission by AngelaBishopFoodie ==
:@[[User:Vaibhav9786|Vaibhav9786]]: your draft was purely promotional, and written not like an encyclopaedia article but a sales brochure.
{{Lafc|username=AngelaBishopFoodie|ts=16:03, 17 January 2025|draft=User:AngelaBishopFoodie/sandbox}}
:Presumably you work for YourCFO, which is what the spam link at the end of the draft was pointing to? In which case, you need to disclose your paid-editing-status (this has already been queried on your talk page), and I would also advise against continuing down this promotional road, lest you get blocked. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:12, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my article. My question is regarding the qualifications for notoriety as 2 articles have been written regarding the topic. [[User:AngelaBishopFoodie|AngelaBishopFoodie]] ([[User talk:AngelaBishopFoodie|talk]]) 16:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
== 17:25, 29 August 2025 review of submission by FurretSuperFan ==
:It's "notability", not "notoriety"(which can have a more negative connotation). Your draft is completely unsourced. If you need help writing references to sources, see [[WP:REFB|Referencing for beginners]]. You seem to be writing about yourself, while not forbidden, it is highly discouraged, please see the [[WP:AUTO|autobiography policy]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:35, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=FurretSuperFan|ts=17:25, 29 August 2025|draft=Draft:Greatest_Idol}}
::Thank you for clarification. I realized the misuse of the word choice after submission. As a beginner, this feedback is appreciated. [[User:AngelaBishopFoodie|AngelaBishopFoodie]] ([[User talk:AngelaBishopFoodie|talk]]) 16:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi my article got denied for the reason that it does not qualify for a Wikipedia article due to not having reliable sources. I'm trying to aim for the notability that the album charted in a national music chart, specifically in the Oricon and Billboards charts. I just wanted to make sure that these links count towards reliability and notability under secondary or independent sources
:Hello, @[[User:AngelaBishopFoodie|AngelaBishopFoodie]]
:{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}}
:Having said that, I would add that [[WP:AUTO|writing about yourself]] is very strongly discouraged, because very few people are capable of writing about themselves sufficiently dispassionately for Wikipedia. A Wikipedia article should be a summary of what [[WP:42|reliable independent sources]] have published about the subject, nothing less and very little more. What the subject or their associates say or want to say about themselves is almost irrelevant. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 21:51, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
https://www.oricon.co.jp/prof/552646/products/1042567/1/
== 17:45, 17 January 2025 review of submission by Sammyueru ==
{{Lafc|username=Sammyueru|ts=17:45, 17 January 2025|draft=Draft:Jongho}}
Hello, this draft is declined with the reason of notability and unreliable resources. I have several questions regarding the decision:
https://www.billboard-japan.com/charts/detail?a=top_albums&year=2013&month=11&day=18 [[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]] ([[User talk:FurretSuperFan|talk]]) 17:25, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
1) I checked [[WP:SINGER]] and [[WP:BANDMEMBER]] while writing this draft, and according to those articles, I believe Jongho fulfills the following criteria:
:Hello, @[[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]]. A sales site is almost never acceptable as a source: it is not independent.
- "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart." --> His solo OST "A Day" charted in Circle and Bugs music chart, and another solo OST "Gravity" charted in Bugs music chart, which are music charts in Korea.
:The Billboard might be reliable, but does not contain [[WP:significant coverage|significant coverage]], as it is just a listing, and I don't think it would count as a [[WP:secondary source|secondary source]] either. We really need independent, in-depth reviews. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 19:26, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
::Would this link work for Oricon instead?
::https://www.oricon.co.jp/prof/552646/rank/album/ [[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]] ([[User talk:FurretSuperFan|talk]]) 20:01, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
::Would this link cunt for a secondary source?
::https://otakumode.com/otapedia/vocaloid/hatsune_miku/mitchie_m [[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]] ([[User talk:FurretSuperFan|talk]]) 20:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:::Count* [[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]] ([[User talk:FurretSuperFan|talk]]) 20:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
::::It doesn't matter which link you use for Oricon - sales sites are almost never acceptable, period.
::::The Otakemode bit appears to be a wiki, with no byline. It therefore fails to be a [[WP:reliable source|reliable source]], and it is very likely not an [[WP:independent source|independent source]] either - we can't tell who submitted it, but it is likely to be the subject or their agents. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 10:16, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
== 18:02, 29 August 2025 review of submission by Jetsonesque ==
- "Members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability" --> As listed in the draft, Jongho various solo activities separate from his group Ateez, as an OST singer, acting, and television shows.
{{Lafc|username=Jetsonesque|ts=18:02, 29 August 2025|draft=Draft:Sam_Bregman}}
Can anyone provide any guidance or input on the latest draft?
Regarding comments on 29 April by editor Paul W, a public media search likely supports relevance/notoriety for Sam Bregman, but that was not established with proper sources and citations.
Earlier entries for Sam Bregman were rejected for relevance, formatting, peacocking and lack of supporting citations. The latest edits attempt to remove problematic text, clean up formatting and citations, comply with tone and informational intentions of Wikipedia entries for public figures, and establish relevance.
Can anyone please help me understand how these do not fulfill the notability criteria?
It may be helpful to compare with the entry for former Las Cruces Mayor, Ken Miyagishima. Intention of latest edition is to create a similar entry for Bregman, with similar tone and proper support material.
2) I used a lot of Korean news article with registered journalists as the cited references. The articles I used also talked about his solo activities, where his name is on the title itself, so it is not just a passing mentions of his name in those articles. Can anyone please point out which references are not suitable for these articles?
Thank you for your help! [[User:SammyueruJetsonesque|SammyueruJetsonesque]] ([[User talk:SammyueruJetsonesque|talk]]) 1718:4502, 1729 JanuaryAugust 2025 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:Jetsonesque|Jetsonesque]]. It is almost ''never'' relevant to compare articles with existing article. Unless the article you are comparing with is either a [[WP:good article|good article]] or a [[WP:featured article|featured article]], its quality is unclear, and may be terrrible. See [[WP:other stuff exists|other stuff exists]]. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 19:29, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|Sammyueru}} I would look at [[WP:CHARTS]] in re the music charts, as we don't accept ''every'' national chart. For South Korea specifically, we accept MIAK, Circle, or ''Billboard'' K-Pop Hot 100. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 17:51, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you! I'll remove the Bugs chart and only keep the Cirlce chart then [[User:Sammyueru|Sammyueru]] ([[User talk:Sammyueru|talk]]) 18:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
= August 30 =
== 18:15, 17 January 2025 review of submission by CamalPirhbaiSLB ==
{{Lafc|username=CamalPirhbaiSLB|ts=18:15, 17 January 2025|draft=Camal Pirbhai}}
Hello everyone! I'm new to Wikipedia. I'm trying to make a biographical entry on Camal Pirbhai, a notable artist in Canada. The article was declined due to a lack of significant coverage in my sources. I cited books, articles and other media. Is there anything I can do to improve my sourcing so the page doesn't get declined again? I don't quite understand what is meant by "lack of significant coverage", as I cited books, articles, and other media. Any help is appreciated. [[User:CamalPirhbaiSLB|CamalPirhbaiSLB]] ([[User talk:CamalPirhbaiSLB|talk]]) 18:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
== Feedback on revised draft: Gerald P. Curatola ==
:Are you Camal Pirbhai? If so, please note that writing [[WP:autobiography|autobiography]] is very strongly discouraged in wikipedia. If not, please explain why you have used his name for your account, and what your relationship is with him. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 21:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I’m seeking feedback on [[Draft:Gerald P. Curatola]], which was previously declined for formatting and sourcing issues. I have now:
* Rewritten in neutral prose.
== 18:49, 17 January 2025 review of submission by Praveenpmanappattu ==
* Replaced weak/self-published links with strong independent sources (Forbes, Miami Herald, Vogue, New York Post, Purist, Yahoo).
{{Lafc|username=Praveenpmanappattu|ts=18:49, 17 January 2025|draft=Draft:Angels_Nair}}
* Corrected citations (ISBN for book, Vogue link, NYU Nexus PDFs confirming Acton Medal and Curatola Wing).
The article is genuine and all references are alive. Please help to publish [[User:Praveenpmanappattu|Praveenpmanappattu]] ([[User talk:Praveenpmanappattu|talk]]) 18:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
* Removed Markdown formatting that triggered the last decline.
Could someone review and let me know if the draft now appears ready for resubmission?
:{{ping|Praveenpmanappattu}} We do not accept content written via [[WP:LLM|chatbot]]. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 06:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks very much.
[[User:GCNYdentist|GCNYdentist]] ([[User talk:GCNYdentist|talk]]) 05:41, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
== 20:09, 17 January 2025 review of submission by Atomobiz ==
:Your autobiography is totally unsourced please don't use AI here it is notoriously bad at creating articles. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 08:16, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=Atomobiz|ts=20:09, 17 January 2025|draft=How to translate a page?}}
Hi,
Italian wiki has a page for Archbishop Lauro Tisi: I've translated part of it ([[Draft:Lauro_Tisi]]) but it got rejected.
What'd be the legitimate way to translate it?
Kind regards,
Atomobiz [[User:Atomobiz|Atomobiz]] ([[User talk:Atomobiz|talk]]) 20:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
== 09:17, 30 August 2025 review of submission by Rsakib188 ==
:Hello, {{U|Atomobiz}}. I have replaced the URL by a Wikilink to the draft - that is much easier to read.
{{Lafc|username=Rsakib188|ts=09:17, 30 August 2025|draft=Draft:2025_CUCSU_election}}
:Your draft has been declined, not rejected: declined means that you may improve it and submit it again.
My submission was rejected and the reason that was given is "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.". Although there are similar articles on wikipedia. Such as [[2025 DUCSU election]] and [[2019 DUCSU election]]. Want to know how can I improve this arcticle to that it get published. [[User:Rsakib188|Rsakib188]] ([[User talk:Rsakib188|talk]]) 09:17, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
:Please start by reading [[WP:translation]].
:Note that [[:it:Lauro Tisi]] has only one source, and that is an official announcement.
:In English Wikipedia, an article is a summary of what [[WP:42|reliable independent sources]] have published about a subject - if no such sources are cited, there can be no article. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 22:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:Please see [[WP:OSE|other stuff exists]], each article or draft is judged on its own merits and not based on the presence of other articles that themselves may be inapproprate and just not yet addressed. Perhaps those two articles should be removed. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:22, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
== 20:09, 17 January 2025 review of submission by Marlaytoday ==
::I'm really struggling to understand why we should have any information on some students' union elections (!) in a global encyclopaedia. (I'm even doubtful about the viability of [[Draft:Chittagong University Central Students' Union]].) -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 09:27, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=Marlaytoday|ts=20:09, 17 January 2025|draft=Draft:Cecilia_Benattar}}
:::There are four autonomous public universities (out of 41 public universities) in Bangladesh that has student parliament (simply called student union) and those are of big deal, as these parliment shape national issues and the elected leaders of these student parliament gets to play role in national politics and even become future national leaders and ministers. These parliment also has say on appointment of Vice-chancellors and teachers of these university. [[User:Rsakib188|Rsakib188]] ([[User talk:Rsakib188|talk]]) 09:54, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
I have thoroughly revised this draft to align with Wikipedia's guidelines, ensuring:
::::Then provide some reliable independent sources that talk about the union in depth, @[[User:Rsakib188|Rsakib188]]. Without several sources that each meet all the criteria of [[WP:42]], a draft (or an article) is like a house without foundations, and not acceptable to Wikipedia. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 10:23, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral point of view throughout the article
::::Are you saying that by law these student bodies have formal input into the operation of the public universities they are associated with? I ask because that's unusual- in the US, at least- where most student bodies are advisory or only have privileges at the pleasure of the university, not in law. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comprehensive citations from reliable, independent sources
:::::Yes, by law student leaders have 5 seat in university senate. And these four universities were established and govern by the act of Bangladeshi parliament as autonomous body. [[User:Rsakib188|Rsakib188]] ([[User talk:Rsakib188|talk]]) 17:27, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Proper encyclopedic tone and formatting
- Removal of any promotional language
- Clear demonstration of subject notability through significant third-party coverage [[User:Marlaytoday|Marlaytoday]] ([[User talk:Marlaytoday|talk]]) 20:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
== 13:24, 30 August 2025 review of submission by Devolver789 ==
:I'm afraid you haven't, @[[User:Marlaytoday|Marlaytoday]].
{{Lafc|username=Devolver789|ts=13:24, 30 August 2025|draft=Draft:Steal_a_Brainrot}}
:The draft currently begins "CB was a trailblazing figure who revolutionized". Two hugely promotional words in the first sentence.
:EvaluativeYou wordswouldn't likeknow thatSteal area neverBrainrot appropriatewould inbe asuitable for Wikipedia article,if unlessyou theylooked arefor beingproper, directlynotable quoted (with attribution) from aand reliable publishedcitations source wholly unconnected with the subject. Please see [[WP:PEACOCK]].yourself [[User:ColinFineDevolver789|ColinFineDevolver789]] ([[User talk:ColinFineDevolver789|talk]]) 2213:1024, 1730 JanuaryAugust 2025 (UTC)
:Sorry, was that a question? -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:25, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
== 21:18, 17 January 2025 review of submission by Editor x45 ==
:{{ping|Devolver789}} There is a very distinct possibility that ''Steal a Brainrot'' is a notable subject. The problem is that [[WP:UNDUE|pretty much all of your sources]] [[WP:RSCONTEXT|waste time on the feud between]] its and ''[[Grow a Garden]]'''s lead developers. Only GameRant discusses ''Steal a Brainrot'' in the context of a review. I have no trouble finding sources that are actually ''about'' the game and not the tangential beef. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 14:35, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=Editor x45|ts=21:18, 17 January 2025|draft=Draft:Julian_Gualtieri}}
::I would like to note I attempted to help out with the draft, locating reviews from Polygon, Kotaku, and GameRant. Problem is, two of the sources fall under purview of [[WP:VALNET]], and [https://www.nme.com/news/gaming-news/steal-a-brainrot-is-robloxs-latest-viral-hit-grow-a-garden-3888650 an additional NME source] I've discovered doesn't qualify as [[WP:SIGCOV]]. As such, I had to regrettably abandon my efforts pending the publication of more reliable reviews. — [[User:VolatileAnomaly|<b style="background-color:black;border:3px solid gray;padding:3px;color:lime;">🪫Volatile</b>]] <sup>[[User talk:VolatileAnomaly|''' 📲T''']] | [[Special:Contributions/VolatileAnomaly|'''⌨️C''']]</sup> 04:32, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
I am seeking assistance with improving and publishing an article draft about Julian Gualtieri, a former professional basketball player and current financial advisor. The draft has undergone several revisions, but it was previously rejected for not meeting Wikipedia’s notability and citation standards.
:::One option would've been to post at [[WP:VG]] to seek the input of editors more familiar with reliable videogame sourcing, but then I discovered the Kotaku source was listed under the opinions section, which was the nail in the coffin for me. If any other editors feel [[Special:Diff/1308406121|this version]] is salvageable feel free to do so. — [[User:VolatileAnomaly|<b style="background-color:black;border:3px solid gray;padding:3px;color:lime;">🪫Volatile</b>]] <sup>[[User talk:VolatileAnomaly|''' 📲T''']] | [[Special:Contributions/VolatileAnomaly|'''⌨️C''']]</sup> 04:52, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
== 18:01, 30 August 2025 review of submission by VasyaPetrovna ==
The draft highlights his notable achievements in basketball, such as his participation in the FIBA Europe All-Star Game (2011, 2013) and his gold medal with San Marino at the European Championship for Small Countries U18 in 2013, along with his career transition into finance as Vice President at Morgan Stanley.
{{Lafc|username=VasyaPetrovna|ts=18:01, 30 August 2025|draft=Draft:Sak-Bahlán}}
Hi - this is the first time I've created a new page. The documentation is a little overwhelming? 😅 I tried submitting the draft for review but the "Draft article not currently submitted for review" box came up, and I don't know what to do next. [[User:VasyaPetrovna|VasyaPetrovna]] ([[User talk:VasyaPetrovna|talk]]) 18:01, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
:{{u|VasyaPetrovna}} I fixed your header so it links to your draft as intended; you need the "Draft:" portion of the title.
:You just need to click the blue "Submit your draft for review!" button in the bottom right corner of the notice that you speak of. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:27, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
::When I click it, it brings up another window, "Template - Generated from: AfC submission." I don't know what if anything I should be changing in that window? [[User:VasyaPetrovna|VasyaPetrovna]] ([[User talk:VasyaPetrovna|talk]]) 19:06, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
:::Never mind, I got it - thank you! [[User:VasyaPetrovna|VasyaPetrovna]] ([[User talk:VasyaPetrovna|talk]]) 19:45, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
== 18:27, 30 August 2025 review of submission by Tanja0615 ==
I have included reliable references, such as:
{{Lafc|username=Tanja0615|ts=18:27, 30 August 2025|draft=Draft:Mehmed_Begić}}
1. RealGM Profile for career statistics.
Hi, thanks for your review. The draft was not written with ChatGPT. One citation I formatted accidentally contained a tracking parameter (utm_source=chatgpt.com) in the URL, which I have now removed. I spent considerable time collecting and checking references from reliable published sources. Could you please point me to any specific passages where you think the language may not be neutral or where style should be adjusted? I’ll gladly revise those. [[User:Tanja0615|Tanja0615]] ([[User talk:Tanja0615|talk]]) 18:27, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
2. Morgan Stanley Official Profile.
3. FINRA BrokerCheck.
4. SEC Adviser Info.
:@[[User:Tanja0615|Tanja0615]] I declined without prejudice, you have now re-submitted which was the correct thing to do. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 11:57, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Despite these efforts, I am struggling to align the article with Wikipedia’s guidelines on notability and verifiability.
== 21:31, 30 August 2025 review of submission by Matthewbyver ==
Could someone kindly review the draft and provide guidance on:
{{Lafc|username=Matthewbyver|ts=21:31, 30 August 2025|draft=Draft:Matthew_Byver}}
• Whether the subject meets the notability criteria for athletes or professionals.
My page is not for promotion, is to help a small music artist to build his career by offering additional informations [[User:Matthewbyver|Matthewbyver]] ([[User talk:Matthewbyver|talk]]) 21:31, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
• Any suggestions for improving the draft’s structure or sourcing.
:What you describe is the [[WP:YESPROMO|exact definition of promotion]]. Wikipedia is the last place to write about something, not the first. A subject must have already arrived and be noticed in order to draw the necessary coverage in independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that can be summarized in an article. It needs to show that you are a [[WP:BAND|a notable musician]] already, you cannot use Wikipedia to generate notability. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell about themselves, please read the [[WP:AUTO|autobiography policy]] and also how [[WP:PROUD|an article is not necessarily desirable]]. I wish you luck with your career, I suggest thar you focus on that and allow an article to develop the usual way, when an independent editor takes note of coverage of you and chooses to write about you. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 00:24, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
I want to ensure the article meets all necessary standards before resubmitting it for review. Your advice or support would be greatly appreciated.
:In other words, you're trying to use Wikipedia as a publicity platform, and [[WP:NOTPUBLICITY|that is not allowed]] under any circumstances. To merit a Wikipedia article, you can't be up-and-coming. You must have already arrived. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 02:07, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
== 21:40, 30 August 2025 review of submission by 69.255.14.163 ==
Thank you for your time and expertise!
{{Lafc|username=69.255.14.163|ts=21:40, 30 August 2025|draft=User:Wiseman2025/sandbox}}
has my artilce been rejected ? [[Special:Contributions/69.255.14.163|69.255.14.163]] ([[User talk:69.255.14.163|talk]]) 21:40, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
:Be sure to log in before you write anything here.
Best regards,
:That draft has been ''declined'', not rejected. If it's declined, it means you can improve it and submit it again once you have addressed the reviewer concerns. If it's rejected, then you give up and move on to something else. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 01:12, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
editor x45 [[User:Editor x45|Editor x45]] ([[User talk:Editor x45|talk]]) 21:18, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
= August 31 =
:Hello, @[[User:Editor x45|Editor x45]]. None of those four sources you mention is of any relevance.
:A Wikipedia article should be a summary of what reliable sources wholly unconnected with the subject have published about the subject: nothing less, and very little more.
:Sources such as those are either not independent, or contain very little encyclopaedic information about the subject (or both). An article based on what they say will have hardly any content. MOst of the content in your draft is unsourced.
:You need to find places where people journalists, researchers, academics, have written in some depth about Gualtieri. If you cannot find several such, then he does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for [[WP:notability|notability]], and no article is possible. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 22:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
== 2209:1218, 1731 JanuaryAugust 2025 review of submission by ПолинаБаляеваTxcraig75 ==
{{Lafc|username=ПолинаБаляеваTxcraig75|ts=2209:1218, 1731 JanuaryAugust 2025|draft=Draft:Акинин_Валерий_АлександровичDirty_Thirty_(Texas_politics)}}
I'm a bit gobsmacked that this has been rejected for lack of "reliable sources." Three New York Times articles, an article from the state historical association, a retrospective by the local ABC news affiliate, an article published in an Abilene newspaper, and a published memoir by one of the group's members are not "reliable?" [[User:Txcraig75|Txcraig75]] ([[User talk:Txcraig75|talk]]) 09:18, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Почему статья отклонена и как сделать так, чтобы она была принята? [[User:ПолинаБаляева|ПолинаБаляева]] ([[User talk:ПолинаБаляева|talk]]) 22:12, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
*This is the English language Wikipedia, and all contributions should be in English. You may like to contribute to [[:ru::|the Russian language Wikipedia.]]
:I don't think it's the sources themselves that are the issue, but I see some unsourced sentences. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:20, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
*''(Следующее было переведено с английского с помощью Google translate, и я не могу ручаться за его точность.)'' Это англоязычная Википедия, и все вклады должны быть на английском языке. Вы можете захотеть внести вклад в [[:ru::|русскоязычную Википедию]]. [[User:JBW|JBW]] ([[User talk:JBW|talk]]) 23:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
== 19:53, 31 August 2025 review of submission by Thilio ==
= January 18 =
{{Lafc|username=Thilio|ts=19:53, 31 August 2025|draft=Draft:AY_Poyoo}}
This [[Draft:AY_Poyoo]] got declined by [[User:TheBirdsShedTears|TheBirdsShedTears]], Reasons {{tq|"This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics)."}} Okay wait a minute, let me list the independent sources (BBC Newss, Vanguard News, Savanna News, The Guardian Nigeria, Modern Ghana, Pluse Ghana, News Hunter, Daily Guide Network including the Secondary sources et cetera. {{tq|"they do not show significant coverage"}} really?? can other editor please search this subject "AY Poyoo" on Microsoft Bling, Google search or any other search engine, because I did that and I found +50 pages and on and on, I also add new references. I'm just curious, PLEASE can experience Editor go and take a look at it. @[[User:TheBirdsShedTears|TheBirdsShedTears]] thank you though, you can also check and leave afc comment if there is issues that need to be corrected. Thanks [[User:Thilio|Thilio]]<sup>[[User talk:Thilio|<span class="robot-signature"><span class="robot-text" style="color:green;">R O B O T</span></span><span class="robot-emoji">🤖</span> <span style="color:#00008B;">talk</span>]]</sup> 19:53, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:Thilio|Thilio]]. You're misunderstanding [[WP:IS|independent]]. If an article is based on an interview or a press release, then it is not independent, irresepctive of who publishes it. Some of your sources certainly have that problem: some may be independent, I haven't looked.
== 01:51, 18 January 2025 review of submission by Smilingrubberduckie ==
:You need several sources which each meet all the criteria in [[WP:42]]. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 09:43, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=Smilingrubberduckie|ts=01:51, 18 January 2025|draft=Draft:TEDxIndianaUniversity}}
::@[[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] Thanks, got it [[User:Thilio|Thilio]]<sup>[[User talk:Thilio|<span class="robot-signature"><span class="robot-text" style="color:green;">R O B O T</span></span><span class="robot-emoji">🤖</span> <span style="color:#00008B;">talk</span>]]</sup> 09:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I was hoping for feedback about how to improve an article I recently wrote (I'm new to creating Wikipedia pages!). I was looking to make a page for TEDxIndianaUniversity and was referencing some other TEDx event Wikipedia pages out there to understand what should be included (e.g. TEDxSanta Cruz, TEDxTauranga, etc.). From those, I assumed the path to follow was provide information about the organisational history, add references to speakers who were at the events, and cite them with a mix of TED entries and local newspaper reporting. The article received a decline, noting that it needed "sources that are in-depth, reliable, secondary, strictly independent." I guess what I'm wondering is where I should improve on the article draft? I attempted to cite each event with local newspaper articles (IDS News) wherever possible, so I'm not sure if it's related to this or perhaps something else I'm not seeing. Any advice would be greatly appreciated... thank you for all the help! [[User:Smilingrubberduckie|Smilingrubberduckie]] ([[User talk:Smilingrubberduckie|talk]]) 01:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
== 21:03, 31 August 2025 review of submission by ProfZacchaeus ==
:You have documented occurrences of this event, and told about what it is, but you have not summarized what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] say is notable about this event, as [[WP:NEVENT|Wikipedia defines a notable event]]. Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about something- we want to know what independent sources say is important/significant/influential about the topic. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=ProfZacchaeus|ts=21:03, 31 August 2025|draft=GUIDELINES FOR SUBMITTING ARTICLES }}
Hello,
I will like to be educated on the vital websites that one can use to cite in line in an article i am writing. infact i need credible sites i can be using. Becuase i have beautiful aricles but i dont have citations for them and when i tried submitting a draft to be considered. It was declined and one of the reasons was that i didnt use credible citations.
and that i was using model language like chatgpt to write my articles.
== 02:19, 18 January 2025 review of submission by 90.236.79.171 ==
{{Lafc|username=90.236.79.171|ts=02:19, 18 January 2025|draft=Draft:Adam_Hajóssy_Dedič}}
Inquiry about a draft.
The draft has a sufficient amount of citations from reliable sources, so why is it declined?
So in summary, i need guidelines that can help me avoid declines when i post or publish my article through my sandbox.
yet, this one has zero and is confirmed?
I am a newbie but a passionate one at that. Thank you [[User:ProfZacchaeus|ProfZacchaeus]] ([[User talk:ProfZacchaeus|talk]]) 21:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ji%C5%99%C3%AD_Gemrot
[[Special:Contributions/90.236.79.171|90.236.79.171]] ([[User talk:90.236.79.171|talk]]) 02:19, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
:Don't write articles [[WP:BACKWARD]], which is what you are doing. You should find sources ''first'', before you write a single word. Your sources should meet the three criteria in [[WP:Golden Rule]]. And write in your own words. Don't use an AI. ChatGPT is horrible at writing articles, and tends to hallucinate things and write in a non-neutral way, even though it may insist it's neutral.
:[[Jiří Gemrot]], unfortunately, [[User:Jéské Couriano/A brief history of AfC|predates the drafting process entirely]] (first edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ji%C5%99%C3%AD_Gemrot&oldid=354177953 2010/04/05]). That said, I will be [[WP:BEFORE|looking for sources for it]] and, if I find none, sending it to [[WP:Articles for deletion|debate]]. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 06:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
:That's how you avoid your drafts being declined. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 21:15, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
= September 1 =
== 09:20, 18 January 2025 review of submission by 96.61.3.224 ==
{{Lafc|username=96.61.3.224|ts=09:20, 18 January 2025|draft=Draft: Relayball (Game)}}
Can I make an edit please [[Special:Contributions/96.61.3.224|96.61.3.224]] ([[User talk:96.61.3.224|talk]]) 09:20, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
== 05:22, 1 September 2025 review of submission by 濵島 ==
:Created by a blocked user, IP now blocked. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=濵島|ts=05:22, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:YOHO_BREWING}}
Hello, I'm the author of this draft. My article submission was declined, but I'm having trouble understanding some of the reasons. Could you please provide some more specific feedback on how to improve the draft and get it approved? Is it okay to cite sources from Japanese sites?Thank you for your help. [[User:濵島|濵島]] ([[User talk:濵島|talk]]) 05:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|濵島}} We accept non-English citations. (We also accept cites to print media and cites to non-English print media.) I would note, however, that most reviewers are going to be using automated translation for non-English sources, and automated translation tends to fare poorly on context-heavy East Asian languages. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 06:51, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
== 09:51, 18 January 2025 review of submission by 223.223.154.13 ==
{{Lafc|username=223.223.154.13|ts=09:51, 18 January 2025|draft=Draft:Sri_Sri_Babathakur}}
I would want to highlight the life of this great person. How can I do so? [[Special:Contributions/223.223.154.13|223.223.154.13]] ([[User talk:223.223.154.13|talk]]) 09:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
== 11:14, 1 September 2025 review of submission by Amir Gull1 ==
:Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about someone. A Wikipedia article about a person must, with a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]], summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a person, showing how they meet the [[WP:BIO|special Wikipedia definition of a notable person]]. Your draft is completely unsourced, and not written neutrally. If you have independent reliable sources that give significant coverage of this person, you may rewrite the draft and ask the rejecting reviewer to reconsider.
{{Lafc|username=Amir Gull1|ts=11:14, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:Amir_Gull_Timuri}}
:If you just want to tell the world about this person, you should do that on social media or a personal website. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:55, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created a draft article titled "Amir Gull Timuri".
:While I feel that the reviewer's immediate rejection to be a little harsh, you have copied the text from external sources and are in breach of copyright. I have flagged it for deletion. 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 09:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
I need assistance to understand what changes or improvements are required so that my draft can be accepted as a Wikipedia article.
Please review it and let me know if there are issues with notability, references, or formatting.
Thank you for your help! [[User:Amir Gull1|Amir Gull1]] ([[User talk:Amir Gull1|talk]]) 11:14, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
:It has been rejected, there is zero evidence of any [[WP:GNG|notability]]. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 11:17, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
:Writing about yourself on Wikipedia is very strongly discouraged, because almost nobody has ever managed to do it successfully: see [[WP:autobiography|autobiography]]
:{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 12:48, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
== 13:4248, 181 JanuarySeptember 2025 review of submission by Blagi66Rahoman ==
{{Lafc|username=Blagi66Rahoman|ts=13:4248, 181 JanuarySeptember 2025|draft=Draft:Artificial_Intelligence_in_SalesCosentino_Group}}
Hi, I asked for help reviewing this article. Several moderators helped me, you can see it here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archive_70#h-Requesting_a_submission,_how_to_procede?-20250731130700). But I haven’t gotten any more replies. Where can I request another review now that I’ve fixed everything that was pointed out? Thanks! [[User:Rahoman|Rahoman]] ([[User talk:Rahoman|talk]]) 13:48, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Is it forbidden to use llm to write parts of the text? [[User:Blagi66|Blagi66]] ([[User talk:Blagi66|talk]]) 13:42, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
:First of all, good job adding more sources to the article. Based on the current references, I would say the subject is definitely notable. '''''However''''', the article still [[WP:NOTPROMO|reads like an advertisement]], and not a neutral encyclopedia article. Your edit after my last rejection did nothing to make the article's text less promotional. Furthermore, you still have not responded to repeated questions about whether you have a [[WP:PSCOI|conflict of interest]] regarding the subject. Deal with that first please. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:pythoncoder|<span style="color:#004080">python</span><span style="color:olive">coder</span>]] ([[User talk:pythoncoder|talk]] | [[Special:Contribs/pythoncoder|contribs]])</span> 21:58, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Blagi66|Blagi66]]: AFAIK it's not strictly speaking ''forbidden'' to use LLM to draft an article, but it is unadvisable. LLMs can't distinguish between acceptable sources and bad ones, at least not reliably, and are known to hallucinate when they can't find a source or can't reference a statement. They may also introduce copyright violations. And their writing style is not ideal for an encyclopaedia. If you're interested, you can read more on this eg. at [[WP:Artificial intelligence]] and [[WP:Using neural network language models on Wikipedia]]. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
:PS: I meant to add that on talk pages, the use of LLMs is frowned upon, or worse. Many users find it inappropriate, not to mention creepy, to be 'talking' to an algorithm when they'd rather talk to a human. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 14:00, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
::There's also the issue that the LLM [[Hallucination (artificial intelligence)|can make up arguments out of whole cloth that are divorced from both reality and Wikipedia policy]]. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 17:24, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
== [[User:GeorgeM2011/EYstreem]] ==
== 14:51, 18 January 2025 review of submission by XRAYNEOFFICIAL ==
{{Lafc|username=XRAYNEOFFICIAL|ts=14:51, 18 January 2025|draft=XRAYNE}}
please ive done all you have asked I have been waiting for 3 months now and every person I have contact is just repeating the same thing and is not straight to the point I have written about his albums, singles, his career before his albums and ive included links aswell. I dont know how your expecting much as it literally says from 2023 to 2025 so how all of you are expect a full blown documenty I dont know. ive got other page for different clients to sort out the same way you have to review it and all im asking is if you could think about it I never said I wanted it imminently all I said was if I remove Spotify and YouTube will it help. [[User:XRAYNEOFFICIAL|XRAYNEOFFICIAL]] ([[User talk:XRAYNEOFFICIAL|talk]]) 14:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
{{u|GeorgeM2011}} has asked for assistance on their draft [[User:GeorgeM2011/EYstreem]] at {{slink|User_talk:GeorgeM2011#How_to_Improve}}. Any and all assistance would be appreciated. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:25, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:XRAYNEOFFICIAL|XRAYNEOFFICIAL]] At risk of repeating myself, all you have to do, all, is to demonstrate that Xraybe passes [[WP:NMUSICIAN]].
:Before you do that, your user talk page has a formal question which you '''must answer before making any other edit of any description''', please. That was doubtless triggered by "{{Purple|ive got other page for different clients to sort out the same way}}" and for which we recommend total transparency 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 15:07, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
*OP blocked for username(as they clearly are not the named person) and UPE. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]])
:Answered <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 15:38, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
== 17:05, 18 January 2025 review of submission by Isaacaschulze ==
{{Lafc|username=Isaacaschulze|ts=17:05, 18 January 2025|draft=Draft:Mad Trucker Gone Mad }}
Why was the article declined? [[User:Isaacaschulze|Isaacaschulze]] ([[User talk:Isaacaschulze|talk]]) 17:05, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|Isaacschulze}} [[WP:Reliable sources|No sources]], [[WP:Notability|no article]], [[WP:Biographies of living persons|no debate]]. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 17:23, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hello @[[User:Isaacaschulze|Isaacaschulze]]. A Wikipedia article should be a summary of what [[WP:42|reliable independent sources]] say about a subject: nothing less, and very little more. If you don't cite any reliable sources, there is literally nothing that you can validly put into an article.
:If there are not enough valid sources discussing the subject, then the subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for [[WP:notability|notability]], and any attempt to write an article will be effort wasted.
:New editors who plunge straight into the challenging task of creating an article usually have a frustrating experience: would you enter a tournament the same day as you picked up a tennis racket for the first time ever?
:{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 18:43, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
== 1915:1754, 181 JanuarySeptember 2025 review of submission by 79lives89.101.68.143 ==
{{Lafc|username=79lives89.101.68.143|ts=1915:1754, 181 JanuarySeptember 2025|draft=DraftUser:VaethMichael_miron123/sandbox}}
Uh,just fora somefamous reasonlad thiswho article wasn't accepted due to the fact that I clearly listed it aswants a disambiguationWikipedia page.account Iand don'tdose knownot whyhave itany hasfane been declined unfortunately. [[UserSpecial:79livesContributions/89.101.68.143|79lives89.101.68.143]] ([[User talk:79lives89.101.68.143|talk]]) 1915:1754, 181 JanuarySeptember 2025 (UTC)
:Looks like that was a goodfaith mistake which was reverted, I have now accepted the page. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 19:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
:Thanks for flagging this up, I will go and delete it. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:56, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
== 20:15, 18 January 2025 review of submission by Monster536 ==
{{Lafc|username=Monster536|ts=20:15, 18 January 2025|draft=Draft:You_Chen}}
Dear Reviewers,
== 16:31, 1 September 2025 review of submission by Mguenego.usparis ==
Thank you for taking the time to review the article on Dr. You Chen. I appreciate the concerns regarding notability and would like to clarify why Dr. Chen meets Wikipedia’s general notability guidelines (GNG), as well as specific criteria for academics under WP:PROF.
{{Lafc|username=Mguenego.usparis|ts=16:31, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:Ström_Paris}}
Hello! I'd like to know if my draft is okay and can be published ? Or if I still need to do some modifications ? Thanks a lot. [[User:Mguenego.usparis|Mguenego.usparis]] ([[User talk:Mguenego.usparis|talk]]) 16:31, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
:You have submitted the draft and it is pending. The reviewer will leave you feedback if they do not accept the draft. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:40, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
1. Tenured Faculty at a Reputable Institution
Dr. Chen is an Associate Professor with tenure at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, a top-ranked academic institution in the United States. Tenure at a major research university often indicates a high level of peer recognition and academic contribution, which aligns with WP:PROF guidelines.
== 18:22, 1 September 2025 review of submission by Changingwormhole ==
2. Significant Award – PECASE
{{Lafc|username=Changingwormhole|ts=18:22, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:V-DOC}}
Dr. Chen is a recipient of the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). This is one of the most prestigious awards for early-career researchers in the United States, endorsed by the White House. Recipients are chosen for their innovative research and leadership in their fields, and national-level recognition such as the PECASE is frequently considered significant evidence of notability.
Hello, I would like some help understanding why my draft was declined. The reviewer noted that the references do not demonstrate notability and that I need more reliable, independent secondary sources.
In my draft, I cited three independent news articles (Kuwait Times, Madhyamam, and Manorama Online) that directly cover the project. I also cited the official company website for technical details (such as the robot’s specifications and ecosystem), since I couldn’t find those details in news reports.
3. Major Peer-Reviewed Grants and Research Impact
i) Dr. Chen has served as Principal Investigator on multiple NIH-funded R01 grants, including research on care coordination and machine learning in pharmacogenetics.
ii) His work in biomedical informatics, machine learning, and clinical informatics has been cited in a substantial number of peer-reviewed publications, indicating sustained impact within the scientific community.
Could the inclusion of the company website as a supporting source have been the problem? If so, am I allowed to use the website only for factual details (like names of components, patent numbers, etc.) while keeping the news articles as the independent coverage that demonstrates notability?
4. Extensive Publication Record
Dr. Chen has published over 100 scholarly articles, serving as first or senior author on more than 75% of them. Many of these articles appear in leading journals such as the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, and JAMA Network Open. They have been independently cited by numerous researchers, demonstrating influence and recognition within the ___domain.
Any guidance would be much appreciated.
5. Fellow of the American Medical Informatics Association (FAMIA)
This fellowship recognizes individuals who make significant professional contributions to the field of informatics. Dr. Chen’s selection as FAMIA further demonstrates his standing among peers.
Page link for reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:V-DOC [[User:Changingwormhole|Changingwormhole]] ([[User talk:Changingwormhole|talk]]) 18:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Given these points, we respectfully request reconsideration of Dr. Chen’s article. His career milestones—tenure at a top-tier research institution, a prestigious national award (PECASE), multiple NIH R01 grants, and recognized fellowships—underscore that Dr. Chen meets both the WP:PROF criteria and general notability requirements. We have also provided reliable, third-party sources where possible, and we welcome further guidance on any additional references or clarifications needed.
*I fixed your header so that your draft is linked to as intended; you need the full title including the "Draft:" portion. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:24, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
== 19:11, 1 September 2025 review of submission by Don Wanyama Off ==
Thank you again for your time and for the opportunity to improve the entry. We look forward to collaborating with the Wikipedia community to ensure the article meets all required standards of verifiability and neutrality.
{{Lafc|username=Don Wanyama Off|ts=19:11, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:List_Of_Media_Tycoons_In_Africa}}
Request for re review on the draft List of Media Tycoons In Africa [[User:Don Wanyama Off|Don Wanyama Off]] ([[User talk:Don Wanyama Off|talk]]) 19:11, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
:If you have addressed the concern of the first reviewer, you may click the Resubmit button. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 19:28, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Sincerely,
:Note that list articles must collect members of the list that merit articles themselves. You're just listing names, none of them have articles, never mind sources. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 19:29, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Monster536 [[User:Monster536|Monster536]] ([[User talk:Monster536|talk]]) 20:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
:* [[WP:QUACK]] - SPI filed [[User:KylieTastic|KylieTastic]] ([[User talk:KylieTastic|talk]]) 19:50, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
= September 2 =
:Who is "we"?
:The first step in appealing a rejection is to appeal to the rejecting reviewer directly.
:Awards do not contribute to notability unless the award itself merits an article. (Like [[Nobel Peace Prize]] or [[Academy Award]]). Being tenured is not listed at [[WP:NPROF]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 20:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
::Please see the quote from White House Press release "the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), the highest honor bestowed by the U.S. government on outstanding scientists and engineers early in their careers." https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2025/01/14/president-biden-honors-nearly-400-federally-funded-early-career-scientists/ [[User:Monster536|Monster536]] ([[User talk:Monster536|talk]]) 13:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::{{u|Monster536}} As I said, what matters is if there is an article about the award. If it's that prestigious, there should be plenty of sources about it to summarize in an article. Awards in and of themselves do not confer notability on a topic, as anyone can create any award. That's the reason there needs to be an article about an award cited as the reason for a person's notability. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::::Is this wiki article helpful to describe the award? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Early_Career_Award_for_Scientists_and_Engineers [[User:Monster536|Monster536]] ([[User talk:Monster536|talk]]) 17:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|Monster536}} We're not going to engage with arguments made by a [[WP:LLM|chatbot]]. If you're serious about this draft, get rid of the LLM and write in your own words. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 07:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::You Chen (draft) was written by Monster536, without using LLMs. The arguments were drafted by Monster536 and polished by LLMs. If Wiki is not allowed for a polish from LLMs, then Monster536 will avoid it next time. Sorry about it. [[User:Monster536|Monster536]] ([[User talk:Monster536|talk]]) 13:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::We want to communicate with you, not a bot. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Again, who is "we"? Are you associated with the professor? [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:33, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::::I am the person who knows the professor. I communicated with the professor to confirm all the information I wrote in the You Chen article is accurate. [[User:Monster536|Monster536]] ([[User talk:Monster536|talk]]) 17:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::@[[User:Monster536|Monster536]] Have you yet appealed directly to the rejecting reviewer? If not, and if you wish to proceed further, please do so. No amount of blandishment here will overturn their rejection, especially when crafted, by or polished by an LLM. 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 17:41, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::Hello, @[[User:Monster536|Monster536]]. Communicating with the professor is of almost no relevance to Wikipedia, as Wikipedia has very little interest in what the subject of an article says about themselves. Wikipedia works on [[WP:verifiability, not truth|verifiability, not truth]]. If the professor tells you something that has not been published in a reliable source it ''may not'' be put in an article. If the professor tells you something that has been published only in non-independent places (such as his own or his department's website) it probably should not be used in an article, though there are exceptions: see [[WP:SPS]]. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 22:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
== 01:00, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Asf132 ==
{{Lafc|username=Asf132|ts=01:00, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:Rao Mulpuri}}
Hi! I am awaiting submission of this biographical article, and despite fixing the initial request from my evaluator, because the article title was "moved" I'm not sure he/she was able to look at the right one. Could someone please ensure everything is ok? I believe it is ready for publishing [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 01:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:I also would like to add that I do not believe that my previous evaluator speaks/understands English proficiently, as evidenced by the language used on their "talk" page and does not grasp the magnitude of the content covered by the professionally written secondary-sourced articles (Bloomberg, Business Insider, Fortune, etc.), which was in this case is covering a once multi-billion-dollar company's CEO.. [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 03:31, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
= January 19 =
::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] could you please take a look? [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 05:18, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Asf132|Asf132]]: sorry, can you please clarify your question – are you just wanting to fast track your draft's review? -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:21, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
::::The issue in question when I spoke to the reviewer "Như Gây Mê" was a lack of notability, but it seems even by the most pessimistic metric of evaluation the subject would qualify under Wikipedia's standards. The reviewer replied to me in broken English without sufficiently providing an explanation for their evaluation: "Hi, I think this is not the right time for me to publish your article, the information is still too little to show the notability of the subject." So I'm asking for another staff member to evaluate the notability requirements of the individual/the article and if they do indeed suffice then I believe that yes, the article should be published based on that being the "issue" of the article. If that "asks" for a faster review, then I guess that's the answer? But it was more of a prior concern with how this requirement was being evaluated.
::::Thank you! [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 05:26, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:::::You have resubmitted the draft, and will therefore get a 'second opinion' in due course once a reviewer gets around to assessing it. We don't provide on-demand reviews here at the help desk.
:::::I have no comment to make regarding another reviewer's command of English; nor should you, in my opinion. Any reviewer working on the English Wikipedia will almost certainly have sufficient skills to be able to review a draft and its associated English-language sources. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:36, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
::::::Ok, got it. I also just received your message about managing a conflict of interest, and I would like to let you know that there is no personal or professional connection to my subject. I have studied the subject independently through my own research in the last half-decade as his company was rising and falling. This should be clearly evidenced by my neutrality throughout my draft, which highlights both his professional accomplishments as well as evidence that he played a significant role in the eventual bankruptcy of his company. [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 05:48, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Unusually (for me), I reviewed the draft you refer to, and also had to decline it for lack of evidence of notability. Most of the sources are either primary, or cover the View company with only passing mentions of Mulpuri. I believe the only one that provides significant coverage directly about him is [https://www.businessinsider.com/view-rao-mulpuri-softbank-bankruptcy-cantor-rxr-2024-8 this] ''BI'' piece (also cited for the second time via AOL, for some reason). -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:::::::PS: I did not decline this because of the unreferenced DOB, I declined it because of insufficient evidence of notability. Resubmitting without any attempt at addressing that issue is disruptive. Don't do that again, please, or your draft may be rejected outright. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:58, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
::::::::Thank you, I appreciate your time and feedback. I have found sources that are secondary that cover the subject in depth and added/replaced them now (if applicable to the content). [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 06:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::You have replaced one source, and resubmitted. Even if that new source were solid, which it isn't, that would still not be sufficient to satisfy [[WP:GNG]].
:::::::::You do you, I suppose, but just be aware that you do not have unlimited attempts at this. If I were you, I would try to make the most of your chances. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 06:20, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::Actually, there were an additional two sources added (one of which was to provide a source for the year, which I will concede is not secondary)) and the other was the Forbes article that was added in with new content (which would count as secondary). Only the second mention of the Business Insider article source was swapped for an equivalent one that aimed to resolve your issue earlier about how it was cited twice (which is what you were referring to, unless you did not see my latest edits). So that was not the one in question that I was referring to. But I understand your general point and will add more that would fit the requirement. [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 06:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::Indeed, you did add more than one new source... after my comment here. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 06:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
== 0002:0001, 192 JanuarySeptember 2025 review of submission by JocptnElesha1188 ==
{{Lafc|username=JocptnElesha1188|ts=0002:0001, 192 JanuarySeptember 2025|draft=Draft:Jannon_Jaye_OttoCyrus_Tang_Foundation}}
Hi, the content that I posted have been declined twice by two peers. And I would like to seek assistance specifically on which part I have to make correction so that I content can edit again and make it live. Thank you ! [[User:Elesha1188|Elesha1188]] ([[User talk:Elesha1188|talk]]) 02:01, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE WIKI PROJECT YOU CAN GOOGLE IT TO VERIFY [[User:Jocptn|Jocptn]] ([[User talk:Jocptn|talk]]) 00:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Elesha1188|Elesha1188]]: now declined for the third time. As I said in my comments two declines ago, primary sources do not establish notability per [[WP:ORG]], and that's all your draft cites. We need to see significant coverage of this organisation in multiple ''secondary'' sources. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:17, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|Jocptn}} [[WP:Biographies of living persons|We have stricter standards than relying on a search engine]] [[WP:CALIPH|that fucks up a basic question about Islam]]. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 07:28, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:Elesha1188|Elesha1188]].
:Don't yell, please. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:34, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{HD/WINI}}
:{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 09:59, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
== 0104:1804, 192 JanuarySeptember 2025 review of submission by Jakeh81Goldface2009 ==
{{Lafc|username=Goldface2009|ts=04:04, 2 September 2025|draft=User:Goldface2009/sandbox}}
{{atop
please review my article and let us know which source is still missing or violate the policy [[User:Goldface2009|Goldface2009]] ([[User talk:Goldface2009|talk]]) 04:04, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
| status = Draft accepted
}}
{{Lafc|username=Jakeh81|ts=01:18, 19 January 2025|draft=Draft:The_Naughty_List_of_Mr._Scrooge}}
I am trying to figure out what about my current article is not enough to get this page published. I have made many films that have much less notability than the singular movie I am trying to have a page created for (and this is the first page I've ever tried to create). I have cited a multitude of sources, and am putting zero biased information for the page up other than the facts about its release and general info which has been highly publicized and published from a number of reputable public sources. Thanks. [[User:Jakeh81|Jakeh81]] ([[User talk:Jakeh81|talk]]) 01:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:Never@[[User:Goldface2009|Goldface2009]]: mind.we Mydon't latestprovide submissionpre-reviews methere at the criteriahelp anddesk, theyou'll pageget wasa created.proper Thankreview once you! submit your draft. I've added a template to it which has a blue 'submit' button for that. -- [[User:Jakeh81DoubleGrazing|Jakeh81DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:Jakeh81DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 06:05:13, 192 JanuarySeptember 2025 (UTC)
{{abot}}
== 0304:5333, 192 JanuarySeptember 2025 review of submission by AlmondaySamyfit556b ==
{{Lafc|username=AlmondaySamyfit556b|ts=0304:5333, 192 JanuarySeptember 2025|draft=DraftUser:Marc_Jackson_(Composer)Samyfit556b/sandbox}}
tell me how do i create the sandbox i wnat to create please sir help [[User:Samyfit556b|Samyfit556b]] ([[User talk:Samyfit556b|talk]]) 04:33, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
First thank you for the explanation for the article's rejection. I only partially used a language model as I used it to make sure the language I was writing fit into the criteria for submission. I might be premature in starting a page here as I'm likely not famous enough or have as much public notoriety as needed. I don't go out and seek publicity so being famous wasn't the goal. BUT the things I've been involved with are well-known. Curb Records, Roger Daltrey, the film Voyage of the Rock Aliens with Ruth Gordon. Jennifer Nettles and Christian Bush, Richard Marx aren't random people. I apologize for attempting to write it myself. I worked hard on it. I'll likely just delete it. The help desk btw was pretty rude. And I don't know if Theroadislong works for you but he's a jerk and can't spell encyclopedia.
Thanks so much.
Marc Jackson
aka Al Monday. (A character on "It Takes a Thief" from the 70s and my nickname since I was 9.) [[User:Almonday|Almonday]] ([[User talk:Almonday|talk]]) 03:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[wiktUser:encyclopaediaSamyfit556b|Samyfit556b]]: it's right there, in the above link. That's where your rejected maydraft beon ofBBKaPitara interestis. -- [[User:AsilveringDoubleGrazing|asilveringDoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:AsilveringDoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:5011, 192 JanuarySeptember 2025 (UTC)
::{{u|Almonday}}, your draft is overtly promotional and violates all three of Wikipedia's core content policies, which are [[WP:V|Verifiability]] and [[WP:OR|No original research]] and the [[WP:NPOV|Neutral point of view]]. Plus, the writing is stilted and bizarre. Your references are spectacularly incompetent. Bare URLs leading to dead links are of zero value. Your draft bears no resemblance to an actual, properly written and referenced encyclopedia article. Note that I used the American English spelling since I live in California. Note that the spelling you mocked was a legitimate British English spelling and that the editor you unwisely ridiculed, {{u|Theroadislong}}, discloses that they live in the United Kingdom, and I will inform you that this editor you insulted has made monumental contributions to this encyclopedia/encyclopaedia vastly greater than you can imagine. You, on the other hand, have submitted third rate robot written self-promotional drivel, and you want actual productive encyclopaedia editors to take you seriously. Hmmmm. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 06:12, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Almonday}} While I do not agree with Cullen's choice of words (they are a mite aggressive), the general thrust of what he says is the correct [[wikt:tenour|tenour]]. Your sources are either website homepages which have [[wikt:naught|naught]] worth citing, a Bandcamp which has a [[wikt:connexion|connexion]] to him, and two random Youtube videos which we can't cite regardless of the philosophical [[wikt:manoeuvre|manoeuvring]] you make to argue for them due to them being music videos. (The URLs for the Youtube videos are also [[wikt:rubbish|rubbish]] and malformed.) —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 07:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::::{{U|Almonday}} I had to look up the insult [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&diff=prev&oldid=1270354022] ... "“jerk,” an American colloquialism, back to 1935, reports: “Originally: an inept or pathetic person; a fool. Now: an objectionable or obnoxious person." Please see [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]] it can lead to a block. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]])
:@[[User:Almonday|Almonday]] I have stepped on [[Warren Mitchell]]'s foot at a party, and literally tripped over [[Mike McGear]] on stage. Does this mean I should have an article?
:Please do not abuse people here; it does not help your quest for an article.
:What will help is referencing which verifies any notability you may have. The rule is simple. No referencing = no article. 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 09:47, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Almonday|Almonday]], I don't see that anybody has pointed out here that [[WP:autobiography|autobiography]] is very strongly discouraged here, since almost nobody can write about themselves in a sufficiently [[WP:NPOV|neutral]] way.
:I'd also point out that the guidelines which you describe as [[User talk:Almonday#December 2024|insane]] are there to help us make the quality of Wikipedia articles as high as possible, and will obviously be difficult for somebody to assimilate who has spent no time whatever practising editing existing articles and "learning on the job". {{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 22:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
== Requesting Review for Draft:Dhiman (Caste) ==
== 11:53, 19 January 2025 review of submission by Fateh451 ==
{{Lafc|username=Fateh451|ts=11:53, 19 January 2025|draft=Draft:Team_LWP}}
its our team. our every team member wants that we have a profile in wikipedia. Please give us permission to create our team profile. [[User:Fateh451|Fateh451]] ([[User talk:Fateh451|talk]]) 11:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I have created and submitted a draft article titled '''[[Draft:Dhiman (Caste)]]'''. I have done my best to follow Wikipedia's guidelines regarding notability, neutrality, and sourcing.
:We don't have profiles here, we have articles written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the subject, that summarize independent sources. If you want to create a profile, use social media. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:55, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if an editor could take a look and provide feedback or review it for publication. Thank you for your time and help!
== 12:49, 19 January 2025 review of submission by Edward Myer ==
{{Lafc|username=Edward Myer|ts=12:49, 19 January 2025|draft=Draft:Bruse Wane}}
Hello, and thank you for you time. I believe the article I have submitted meets wikipedias guideline under General Notability, And Notability under Wikipedia guidelines for (Musicians & Enables). It has been properly sourced with numerous independent references independent of the subject. I may have unintentionally ruffled a few feathers, On December 28th I was contacted by the user DoubleGrazing on my talk page about a possible conflict of Interest. After disputing the claim I asked him about what I felt was a snide comment towards me on the Admins LIZ's talk page. He said he did not like my Shirty response. Another user Buster D who seems to be following my every move entered the conversation and told me to lash out at my peril. "Lash out at your peril. BusterD (talk) 08:57, 29 December 2024" , Since then I believe I have been targeted by a circle of editors.
[[User:Indiauser1971|Indiauser1971]] ([[User talk:Indiauser1971|talk]]) 08:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Instead of moving my draft to wikipedia's main space I sent if for review looking for help on its possible improvement. It was immediately declined by, the User Theroadislong (Who appears not be versed in what is considered sources of notability in the genre of Hip Hop Music). I started a topic on Theroadislong's talk page entitled "Who Sent Yah" in reference to my draft articles decline. The comment made during the conversation by Theroadislong' to DoubleGrazing showed they were clearly in cahoots on the articles decline, with Theroadislong to DoubleGrazing" Heh! :) DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]and now they are blocked as a sock of User:Edward Myer. Theroadislong (talk) 09:17, 30 December 2024 (UTC)"
:You have submitted it for review and it is pending. Please be aware of the rules when editing about social groups in India- I will post them to your user talk page- probably you shouldn't have created this draft at all- but if it is accepted, you cannot edit it again until your account is extended-confirmed(30 days old with 500 edits) [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:07, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
I also received this message on my talk page from Buster D "Who told me to initially lash out at my Peril" I suspect that someone is about to remove your talk page privileges for your failure to act like a normal editor and unwillingness to accept your own responsibilities here. Unfortunately, your bad behavior will also likely translate into never seeing Draft:Bruse Wane published again. This is entirely on you, Edward Myer. Your bad behavior. Not theirs. BusterD (talk) 09:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] "They are the ones exhibiting bad behavior because I took exception to a snide remark. Buster D has tried also tried to change the narrative with this statement when I felt he was stalking me"Edward Myer, there's quite a difference between stalking somebody and merely noticing one editor is acting badly (as admins User:Bishonen, User:331dot), User:UtherSRG, User:NinjaRobotPirate, User:C.Fred, User:DoubleGrazing,"
:Hello, @[[User:Indiauser1971|Indiauser1971]].
:Separately from the point 331dot made about Indian social groups, {{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 10:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
== 10:12, 2 September 2025 review of submission by 103.182.14.46 ==
My Draft was once again declined on January 19th and I believe no matter how thoroughly sourced it is with citations of notability by the subject. It will never be approved as there is a personal vendetta being enacted against. me. My Draft is being held hostage. Once again as state by Buster D as he tries to change the narrative on my talk page "Unfortunately, your bad behavior will also likely translate into never seeing Draft:Bruse Wane published again. This is entirely on you, Edward Myer.
{{Lafc|username=103.182.14.46|ts=10:12, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:Ehtasham_Malik}}
Can you guide me on which words are promotional [[Special:Contributions/103.182.14.46|103.182.14.46]] ([[User talk:103.182.14.46|talk]]) 10:12, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
== 10:16, 2 September 2025 review of submission by 102.22.207.86 ==
My Draftis spitefully being held hostage and being declined. I would like me decline reveresed,as they are being done with Malice intent.
{{Lafc|username=102.22.207.86|ts=10:16, 2 September 2025|draft=Unite180}}
Article was declined. Any assistance possible with getting it approved and guidance on writing it better or removing references that seem problematic. [[Special:Contributions/102.22.207.86|102.22.207.86]] ([[User talk:102.22.207.86|talk]]) 10:16, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
== 10:55, 2 September 2025 review of submission by NeutralMMMUser ==
{{Lafc|username=NeutralMMMUser|ts=10:55, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:Objective_Platform}}
I tried to adjust this article multiples times to the feedback I got but apparently it's still not good enough – can someone help or tell me what exactly is not working? I just quoted external sources and took out everything that I think sounds like "advertisement". [[User:NeutralMMMUser|NeutralMMMUser]] ([[User talk:NeutralMMMUser|talk]]) 10:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:You are making a common, but fundamental, mistake in that you are telling us what you want the world to know about your company. That is the wrong approach. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:ORG|a notable company]]. Interviews, press releases, brief mentions, or the reporting of routine business activities does not establish notability. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:39, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
== 11:59, 2 September 2025 review of submission by 103.182.14.46 ==
I also received this message from someone believing I'm the article's subject on January 16th 2025. From
{{Lafc|username=103.182.14.46|ts=11:59, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:Ehtasham_Malik}}
Ritik| Wikipedia Support r.singh@idigitalakki.co.in
Can tell why reject the article [[Special:Contributions/103.182.14.46|103.182.14.46]] ([[User talk:103.182.14.46|talk]]) 11:59, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:The subject is not [[WP:GNG|notable]] press releases are not reliable independent sources. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 12:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
== 12:24, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Talha Sti ==
Dear Bruse,
{{Lafc|username=Talha Sti|ts=12:24, 2 September 2025|draft=User:Talha_Sti/sandbox}}
Why my article is not publishing what is wrong in it [[User:Talha Sti|Sti]] ([[User talk:Talha Sti|talk]]) 12:24, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:Your draft lacked the coding needed to submit it- this is provided if you use the [[WP:WIZARD|Article Wizard]] to create and submit a draft.
I noticed that your recent Wikipedia Bruse Wane submission was rejected. At IDigitalAKKI Media, we specialize in getting pages approved on Wikipedia, even after prior rejections.
:However, your draft was throughly promotional and has been deleted. Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about a company. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:ORG|a notable company]]. Interviews, press releases, brief mentions, or the reporting of routine business activities does not establish notability.
:If you work for this company/website, you are required by the Terms of Use to disclose that, see [[WP:PAID]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:36, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
== 13:45, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Kay3233 ==
Here’s how we can help:
{{Lafc|username=Kay3233|ts=13:45, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:APAC_Tower}}
• Revise and rework your content to meet Wikipedia’s strict guidelines.
Hello, I noticed the article on APAC Tower was rejected for notability. I would like guidance on whether the coverage I have from independent sources is sufficient, or what additional sources would be needed.
• Ensure proper citations from credible sources.
• Provide a 100% guarantee of successful placement on Wikipedia.
I have few questions.
If you’re ready to establish your presence on Wikipedia, let’s get started. Reply to this email, and we’ll guide you through the next steps.
1. Do the awards (Fitwel 3-Star 2025, Thailand Property Award) count as notable recognition for the building?
2. Do independent news reports from Bangkok Biz News, RE Talk Asia, and AustCham Thailand establish enough secondary coverage?
3. Would mentioning prominent multinational tenants (Asia Pulp & Paper, Mazda Sales, TOA Electronics) help demonstrate significance?
Thank you, [[User:Kay3233|Kay3233]] ([[User talk:Kay3233|talk]]) 13:45, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Looking forward to assisting you.
:Awards only contribute to notability if the award itself merits an article, like [[Nobel Peace Prize]] or [[Academy Award]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:37, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Best regards,
Ritik Singh
IDigitalAKKI Media [[User:Edward Myer|Edward Myer]] ([[User talk:Edward Myer|talk]]) 12:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
== 14:13, 2 September 2025 review of submission by TurnipShadow ==
:The message is from a scammer, do not give anyone money. See [[WP:SCAM]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=TurnipShadow|ts=14:13, 2 September 2025|draft=User:TurnipShadow/sandbox}}
:No one can provide a "100%" guarantee of anything. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
I've drafted something but cant see how I move it to be considered for publish [[User:TurnipShadow|TurnipShadow]] ([[User talk:TurnipShadow|talk]]) 14:13, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Edward Myer|Edward Myer]]: I have said this already, but apparently I need to say it again: do not go around accusing others of inappropriate behaviour without solid evidence (and even then, doing so behind their back is poor form, to say the least), let alone making personal attacks and innuendos. You were lucky to get away with a temporary block, and it's disappointing to see that you immediately return to the same sort of behaviour which contributed to you being blocked. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:23, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|Edward Myer}} That email is from a [[WP:SCAM|scammer]]. Do not reply to it. As to your sources, refer to my /Decode subpage (linked in my signature as "critiques":
:* https://goldstandardbookings.bandzoogle.com/bruse-wane is useless for [[WP:Notability|notability as Wikipedia defines it]] ([[WP:PRIMARY|connexion to subject]]). I have to assume this is a company that helps him get booked for gigs.
:* We can't use https://hiphopdx.com/news/id.52128/title.dxclusive-bruse-wane-connects-with-papoose-for-killa-soundboy-video ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Too short to cite, especially as one whole paragraph (of two) is an extended quote.
:* We can't use https://www.spitfirehiphop.com/music/2022/04/bruse-wane-connects-with-legendary-reggae-artist-sister-nancy-on-still-a-bam-bam/ ([[WP:SPS|unknown provenance]]). Role byline, who actually wrote this?
:* I am unsure if https://www.dancehallreggaeworld.com/bruse-wane-premiers-new-single-sunrise-to-sunset.html is authored by a single credited person. I would err on not using it.
:* We can't use https://rapstation.com/news/bruse-wane-single ([[WP:SPS|unknown provenance]]). Role byline; who wrote this?
:* We can't use https://www.spitfirehiphop.com/interviews/2024/09/bruse-wane-talks-who-invented-hip-hop-sean-p-papoose-more/ ([[WP:SPS|unknown provenance]]) and even if we could it'd be useless for notability ([][WP:PRIMARY|connexion to subject]]). Interview credited to a role byline.
:* https://bronx.news12.com/hip-hop-icon-disco-king-mario-honored-with-street-co-naming-as-part-genres-50th-birthday-celebrations is a [[WP:RSCONTEXT|non-sequitur]]. A source that doesn't even mention him is not going to be usable as a source about him.
:* [[WP:DISCOGS|We can't cite Discogs (no editorial oversight).]]
:* https://1stdayfresh.com/2017/10/27/1stdayfresh-interview-bruse-wane/ is useless for notability ([[WP:PRIMARY|connexion to subject]]). Interview.
:* We can't use https://undergroundhiphopblog.com/singles/bruse-wane-manhattan-ny-home-of-the-spitters-ft-keith-murray-fam-illy/ ([[WP:SPS|unknown provenance]]). Role byline; who wrote this?
:* We can't use https://musicexistence.com/blog/2014/07/28/bruse-wane-f-sean-price-beast-inside/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Discounting the extended quote, the source is a whole two sentences.
:* https://thesource.com/2014/03/28/never-on-schedule-but-always-on-time-week-of-32814/2/ is useless for notability ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Listicle.
:* I can't assess https://www.fuse.tv/2014/07/rappers-named-after-comic-book-characters#9 (walled).
:* https://hiphopdx.com/news/id.35001/title.sean-price-passes-away-dj-premier-just-blaze-react is a [[WP:RSCONTEXT|non-sequitur]].
:* https://www.billboard.com/music/rb-hip-hop/hip-hop-stars-remember-sean-price-heltah-skeltah-boot-camp-clik-6656754/# is a [[WP:RSCONTEXT|non-sequitur]] and would be better used in the article on [[Sean Price]].
:* https://www.cnn.com/2015/08/09/entertainment/rapper-sean-price-dies-feat/index.html is a [[WP:RSCONTEXT|non-sequitur]] and would be better used in [[Sean Price]].
:* https://fox40.com/news/national-and-world-news/brooklyn-rapper-sean-price-dies-at-43-cause-unknown/ has been discussed and dismissed (it's a repub of the CNN source).
:* https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/sean-price-veteran-rapper-and-boot-camp-clik-member-dead-at-43-33569/ is a [[WP:RSCONTEXT|non-sequitur]] and would be better used in [[Sean Price]].
:* We can't use https://insomniacmagazine.com/bruse-wane-sean-price-chris-rivers-deliver-venom/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). One-sentence "article". I should note that we do not do [[WP:WAX|notability-by-osmosis]]; you need to prove Bruse Wane is notable regardless of his associations with Price or any other notable act.
:* We can't use https://hiphopdx.com/videos/id.24379/title.dxclusive-bruse-wane-drops-venom-f-sean-price-chris-rivers ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Extremely short article.
:* We can't use https://colorlines.com/article/listen-some-sean-prices-last-verses-venom/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Article is extremely light on any sort of detail due to its length.
:* We can't use https://urbanvault.co.uk/2015/11/24/bruse-wane-ft-sean-price-chris-river-venom-audio-earl-manigault-of-rap-album/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Article is too short to cite.
:* https://www.rapreviews.com/2015/10/bruse-wane-earl-manigault-of-rap/ is borderline. Most of the article is about unrelated people (either Price or [[Earl Manigault]]), but the last couple paragraphs do remember that this is supposed to be a music review.
:* We can't use https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/dbf71afc-6d9b-4f8d-be5a-54d94aa01742 ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Content-free listing.
:* https://ambrosiaforheads.com/2016/08/sean-price-chris-rivers-venom-video/ is useless for notability ([[WP:RSCONTEXT|wrong subject]]). Ostensibly about "Venom", spends most of its time on Price.
:* We can't use https://hiphopdx.com/videos/id.24951/title.bruse-wane-chris-rivers-perform-venom-live-in-brooklyn ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Itsy-bitsy-teeny-weenie-three-small-sentence-article.
:* We can't use http://premierwuzhere.com/videos/bruse-wayne-feat-sean-price-whispers-venom/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Shorter than an any% ''[[We Happy Few]]'' [[speedrun]].
:* We can't use https://grandgood.com/2017/12/07/the-universal-hip-hop-museum-presents-16-bars-4-hip-hop/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]) and even if we could it's a [[WP:RSCONTEXT|non-sequitur]]. The "article" is basically one massive block-quote.
:* https://hiphopdx.com/news/id.42041/title.fu-schnickens-chip-fu-talks-universal-hip-hop-museums-16-bars-4-hip-hop-album is a [[WP:RSCONTEXT|non-sequitur]].
:* We can't use https://www.vanndigital.com/brusewane-ol-head-mp3/ ([[WP:SPS|unknown provenance]]). Role byline; who wrote this?
:* https://www.proskauer.com/ranking/proskauer-honors-pro-bono-work-at-tenth-annual-golden-gavels is useless for notability ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). A mention in a press release put out by a law firm.
:* https://www.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/565-22/mayor-adams-commissioner-cumbo-5-5-million-universal-hip-hop-museum-new-capital#/0 is a [[WP:RSCONTEXT|non-sequitur]] and even if it weren't it'd be useless for notability ([[WP:PRIMARY|gov't document]]).
:* https://hiphopwired.com/813774/lil-nas-x-ft-young-thug-billy-ray-cyrus-mason-ramsey-old-town-road-remix-bruse-wane-ft-papoose-killa-soundboy-more-daily-visuals-7-16-19/ is useless for notability ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). One-sentence mention, no discussion of him or his work.
:* We can't use https://insomniacmagazine.com/bruse-wane-x-papoose-drop-killa-soundboy/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]], [[WP:SPS|unknown provenance]]).
:* https://hiphopdx.com/news/id.51654/title.dxclusive-papoose-hops-on-bruse-wanes-killa-soundboy-single is useless for notability ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Discounting the [[WP:PRIMARY|extended quote]], no discussion of Wane or the single the article's supposed to be about.
:* We can't use https://blackouthiphop.com/blog/bruse-wane-ft-papoose-killa-soundboy/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Source is shorter than "[[You Suffer]]".
:* https://blackouthiphop.com/bruse-wane-interview-with-dj-kay-slay/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3QrwC6T4ZVEyZPFkWM8KRpUl4Jiyih8at5uWO8GXF4VDBAjnuvRG6sFew_aem_RH0dKXkbpAdd63sxmsx-7w is useless for notability ([[WP:PRIMARY|connexion to subject]]). Interview. (I should note that we wouldn't be able to cite the YouTube video directly even if it were acceptable; YouTube as a source is usable only if the video was produced by an outlet we'd consider to have strong editorial oversight and uploaded to that outlet's verified channel.)
:* https://www.solovibesmusic.com/2019/08/dj-kay-slay-interviews-bruse-wane.html has been discussed and dismissed; this is effectively the same source as above.
:* We don't cite [[Instagram]] or any other form of social media such as [[Bluesky]], [[Mastodon (social network)|Mastodon]], [[Facebook]], [[Twitter|Xitter]], etc. ([[WP:SPS|no editorial oversight]]).
:* https://www.billboard.com/music/rb-hip-hop/dj-kay-slay-55-dead-covid-19-battle-obituary-1235060195/ is a [[WP:RSCONTEXT|non-sequitur]].
:* https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/dj-kay-slay-dead-obituary-covid-19-1339108/ is a [[WP:RSCONTEXT|non-sequitur]].
:* I'm fairly certain I might get castigated by other reviewers for this (I'm not overly familiar with musician articles thanks to the ever-present Genre Wars), but https://urbanvault.co.uk/2023/10/11/mantronix-ft-bruse-wane-money-talks-music-video-itunes-spotify/ seems borderline. It's certainly more detailed than the other Urban Vault articles I've seen to this point, but it is still on the shorter side.
:* We can't use https://www.spitfirehiphop.com/videos/2023/10/mantronix-releases-money-talks-video-feat-bruse-wane/ ([[WP:SPS|unknown provenance]]). Role byline; who wrote this?
:* We can't use https://rappersiq.com/blogs/news/mantronix-feat-bruse-wane-when-the-doves-fly-official-video?_pos=1&_sid=c3378f35a&_ss=r ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]], [[WP:SPS|unknown provenance]]).
:* We can't use https://www.spitfirehiphop.com/videos/2023/12/mantronix-hits-hard-with-money-talks-prepares-to-conquer-with-era-of-the-a-i/ ([[WP:SPS|unknown provenance]]). Role byline; who wrote this?
:* We can't use https://insomniacmagazine.com/mantronix-drops-money-talks-f-bruse-wane/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]], [[WP:SPS|unknown provenance]]).
:* We can't use http://www.hiphopondeck.com/2023/12/mantronix-ft-bruse-wane-era-of-ai-video.html ([[WP:SPS|unknown provenance]]). Role byline.
:* We can't use https://www.rapmaniacz.com/when-the-doves-fly-e-il-nuovo-singolo-di-mantronix-con-bruse-wane/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Nothing here to really work with.
:* We can't use https://starfleetmusic.com/record_pool/index.php/music-charts-mainmenu-53/indie-label-charts-mainmenu-57/5001-top-50-indie-urban-hip-hop-latin-chart-6-1-2024 ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). See [[WP:CHARTS]] for what music charts we will accept. (This is not an idle concern; some charts are [[Payola|pay-to-play]] while others are vendor-specific.)
:* We can't use https://www.viberate.com/artist/concerts/bruse-wane-upcoming-concerts/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Content-free listing. (And frankly, it'd be hard to imagine a musical act that didn't put on concerts, even if it's just a [[pub crawl]] tour.
:* https://sindustrymedia.com/news/f/bruse-wane-papoose-sean-price-mantronix-affiliate-dj-sin is useless for notability ([[WP:PRIMARY|connexion to subject]]). As a note, pointing to articles about an upcoming concert is useless for proving he ''actually attended'', as there's any number of things that can make someone no-show ([[The Day the Music Died|plane crash]], [[Van Halen#Contract riders|brown M&Ms in the candy bowl]], [[Chris Benoit double-murder and suicide|committing pater familicide]], etc.).
:* We can't use https://urbanvault.co.uk/2018/08/21/bruse-wane-king-of-kings-freestyle-audio-free-download/ ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). Article shorter than [[Mass Transit incident (professional wrestling)|Mass Transit]]'s career.
:* We can't use https://www.spitfirehiphop.com/music/2024/04/bruse-wane-releases-the-remastered-stone-age-single/ ([[WP:SPS|unknown provenance]]). Role byline, you get the picture by now.
:* https://www.downtownworcester.org/es/event/papoose-bruse-wane-live-elevation-tour-worcester-8-13/ is useless for notability ([[WP:PRIMARY|connexion to subject]]). Concert flyer.
:* https://do617.com/events/2023/4/21/bruse-wane-yazir-da-deejay-tickets is useless for notability ([[WP:PRIMARY|connexion to subject]]). Concert flyer.
:* http://www.ok-tho.com/2019/07/single-bruse-wane-keepers-of-flame-feat.html is useless for notability ([[WP:SPS|no editorial oversight]]). Random blog.
:* We can't use https://www.alamy.com/bruse-wane-along-with-dj-ether-opened-up-for-epmd-on-july-192018-at-the-nj-pac-image213055398.html?imageid=F5A6D280-EAE2-4846-AA8F-F390BCA9A2B6&p=573267&pn=1&searchId=66c65a68aabc7ad2a3f0dcbd9bee4e1d&searchtype=0 ([[WP:SIGCOV|too sparse]]). We don't cite photos.
:You have a couple borderline sources out of your whole 58. The rest are completely unusable, either because they're extremely short or they aren't about Wane in the slightest. There's nothing here to really [[WP:Biographies of living persons|work with]] for an article. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 17:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:TurnipShadow|TurnipShadow]]: I've added the submission template, it has a blue 'submit' button with which you can send it for review when you're ready. I've also moved it into the draft name space, at [[Draft:Jools’ Law]]. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 14:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
== 16:26, 19 January 2025 review of submission by 70.52.185.101 ==
::Thank you very much [[User:TurnipShadow|TurnipShadow]] ([[User talk:TurnipShadow|talk]]) 14:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=70.52.185.101|ts=16:26, 19 January 2025|draft=Draft: Owen Hooper (Mouth Breather)}}
Hi there,
== 15:55:24, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Psymba ==
I am a new user to wiki, but I’ve been exploring all resources on how to create an article. My draft for the above article was declined and I would like to receive a bit more specific feedback on what it was declined and what changes I can make to have it approved. Thanks so much. [[Special:Contributions/70.52.185.101|70.52.185.101]] ([[User talk:70.52.185.101|talk]]) 16:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
{{Lafc|username=Psymba|ts=15:55:24, 2 September 2025|link=Mike_Abrams_(psychologist)
:You have not shown how he meets the [[WP:BAND|definition of a notable musician]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
<!-- [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here]] OR [[Draft:Mike_Abrams_(psychologist)]] -->
}}
== 16:45, 19 January 2025 review of submission by JoshuaHG7 ==
{{Lafc|username=JoshuaHG7|ts=16:45, 19 January 2025|draft=Draft:The best of TCGs}}
I submitted this to show all of the good things about tcgs and it was rejected with no clear reason. I have no idea about what happened. Double Grazing was the person who rejected it. [[User:JoshuaHG7|JoshuaHG7]] ([[User talk:JoshuaHG7|talk]]) 16:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:Fixed your link. The draft is an essay of questions, not an encyclopedia article. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:47, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:I've just replied on my talk page. Please don't ask the same question in several places at once.
:In short, this is not a viable encyclopaedia article, hence why I rejected rather than merely declined it. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 17:08, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
== 17:38, 19 January 2025 review of submission by Zenithxxx ==
{{Lafc|username=Zenithxxx|ts=17:38, 19 January 2025|draft=Draft:Assassination_of_Muhammad_of_Ghor}}
My article was rejected twice for reasons I feel dont align with the wiki guidelines used to reject my page. It was firstly rejected for being an unacceptable fork however based off the fork wiki page the topic assassination of Mohammed Ghori was acceptable as it was to develop from a sub-topic in which the examples given by the fork wiki (Death of Michael Jackson forking from the Michael Jackson wiki) matches with mine. However it was then rejected a second time for supposedly not being notable which does not make sense in my opinion. Mohammed Ghori was the founder and the first emperor of the Ghorid Empire of central asia. Furthermore based off of the wiki notability guidelines a topic is considered notable if the topic recieves coverage in reliable sources, which it has been. The topic has been notably discussed in many reliable medieval historical texts by independant third party historical authors such as by Minhaj-i-Siraj Juzjani, Firishta, Ibn al-athir, the Tarikh-i-alfi which was commissioned by the Mughal emperor Akbar and the Jami al-Tawarikh produced in the Mongol Ilkhanate with signiifcant mention, which leads me to believe it was wrongly rejected twice. Modern day authors such as VD Mahajan, sir henry Miers Elliot among many others refer to his death also, so this rejection should kindly be reconsidered.
Kind regards [[User:Zenithxxx|Zenithxxx]] ([[User talk:Zenithxxx|talk]]) 17:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:The first step in appealing a rejection is to ask the rejecting reviewer to reconsider. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 19:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::What would come after asking the reviewer to reconsider as after messaging him he hasn't expanded much as to why he considers it not notable and also failed to discuss of any of my points as to why I consider it notable based on the GNG. (The messages are located on his talk page) [[User:Zenithxxx|Zenithxxx]] ([[User talk:Zenithxxx|talk]]) 17:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 18:39, 19 January 2025 review of submission by Sliyanage1967 ==
{{Lafc|username=Sliyanage1967|ts=18:39, 19 January 2025|draft=Draft:Sunanda_Deshapriya}}
I am a little frustrated by continued rejection of this article. In today's edited version, I tried to remove as much as so called peacock terms. I have also added numerous references. Ultimately, this is about of the leading journalists from Sri Lanka who does not have a wikipedia page yet. I would appreciate your assistance. [[User:Sliyanage1967|Sliyanage1967]] ([[User talk:Sliyanage1967|talk]]) 18:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hi @[[User:Sliyanage1967|Sliyanage1967]], the entirety of:
:"''Deshapriya’s most recent work, Easter Sunday Attacks in Sri Lanka: Shadow of the Deep State and Unanswered Questions, delves into the tragic and unprecedented events of 2019 Sri Lanka Easter Bombings, which targeted churches and hotels, resulting in over 250 deaths. This book examines the complex web of political intrigue and intelligence failures surrounding the attacks. Deshapriya investigates not only the immediate aftermath but also the larger, unresolved questions regarding the involvement of Sri Lanka's shadowy "deep state" and the failure of authorities to prevent such a catastrophic event. Through this work, Deshapriya highlights the systemic issues that contributed to the tragedy and urges a critical examination of Sri Lanka's political and security landscape.''"
:is written in an inappropriate emotive, tone. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 18:47, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
== 18:53, 19 January 2025 review of submission by Maclaveau ==
{{Lafc|username=Maclaveau|ts=18:53, 19 January 2025|draft=Draft:Compar_Assurance}}
I need help to make my page accepted. What more info do I need to provide? [[User:Maclaveau|Maclaveau]] ([[User talk:Maclaveau|talk]]) 18:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Maclaveau|Maclaveau]] it's just an advert for the company, @[[User:Maclaveau|Maclaveau]]. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 18:55, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::Im new here, what changes do you suggest? [[User:Maclaveau|Maclaveau]] ([[User talk:Maclaveau|talk]]) 18:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Maclaveau|Maclaveau]] I've marked the draft for deletion as pure spam. What is your connection to the company? It seems odd to write a first draft in such a promotional way unless you are employed by them in some way? Are you? <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 18:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::::Yes I am employed. As i'm new here, and this is my first article, i'm still learning. I did not know that we were not allowed to write an article for a compagy that we work for. Before deleting, is it possible to have some help/suggestions on what I can do/modify to make the page approuved and meet the Wikipedia guidelines? I am open to do the nessary ajustements :) [[User:Maclaveau|Maclaveau]] ([[User talk:Maclaveau|talk]]) 19:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::@[[User:Maclaveau|Maclaveau]] Your next step ''must'' be to declare your paid editing by following the instructions at [[WP:PAID]]. Failure to do this is a breach of our Terms and Conditions.
:::::In essence, Wikipedia is not a platform for promoting or advertising a topic. Our articles must be written in a strictly neutral way, and should only summarise what reliable independent secondary sources state about a topic. You would need to find at least three sources that are each reliable, fully independent of the company, and provide significant coverage with in-depth analysis/discussion/commentary of the company. Then, summarise those sources in your own words in a strictly neutral way. That should be the content of your draft.
:::::Have a read of our criteria for inclusion for companies at [[WP:NORG]]. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::Ok got it! I just rewote a 100% neutral version of the page. As for the Would it be possible to remove de deletion? I will make the necessary adjusements. [[User:Maclaveau|Maclaveau]] ([[User talk:Maclaveau|talk]]) 19:09, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::I have removed the deletion tag in good faith, but you '''must''' declare the paid editing now or your account may be blocked. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:11, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::Can you guide me on how to declare the paid editing? Please [[User:Maclaveau|Maclaveau]] ([[User talk:Maclaveau|talk]]) 19:14, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::Btw thanks alot, I will modify to meet the requirements!! [[User:Maclaveau|Maclaveau]] ([[User talk:Maclaveau|talk]]) 19:15, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::[[User:Maclaveau|Create your user page here, outlining you are an employee of the company and are being paid to edit.]] See [[WP:PAID]] for the template to use.
::::::::::I would also recommend reading [[Wikipedia:When your boss tells you to edit Wikipedia]] <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:16, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::I just put it on my profile, can you verify if its ok? Thank you very much for your time! [[User:Maclaveau|Maclaveau]] ([[User talk:Maclaveau|talk]]) 19:19, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::::That's correct, thank you. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:20, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Thank you for your help! [[User:Maclaveau|Maclaveau]] ([[User talk:Maclaveau|talk]]) 19:21, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::::::You may also want to read [[WP:FIRST]] and [[WP:BOSS]]. -- [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 23:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
= January 20 =
== 05:34, 20 January 2025 review of submission by Julynoeh ==
{{Lafc|username=Julynoeh|ts=05:34, 20 January 2025|draft=User:Julynoeh/sandbox}}
"I believe my article was not written in a promotional manner, yet it was declined. Could you kindly provide more details on how I can improve it to meet Wikipedia's guidelines? I would appreciate any specific feedback you have. Thank you!" [[User:Julynoeh|Julynoeh]] ([[User talk:Julynoeh|talk]]) 05:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:The whole thing, particularly the advantages part feels more like an essay or a promotion on a website [[User:Thehistorianisaac|Thehistorianisaac]] ([[User talk:Thehistorianisaac|talk]]) 05:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:A Wikipedia article should be a summary of what [[WP:42|reliable independent sources]] say about a subject. If you write what the subject says or wants to say about themselves, it's likely to read as promotional. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 15:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 05:53, 20 January 2025 review of submission by U043talks ==
{{Lafc|username=U043talks|ts=05:53, 20 January 2025|draft=User:U043talks/sandbox}}
Help with editing as submission was declined. [[User:U043talks|U043talks]] ([[User talk:U043talks|talk]]) 05:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Add reliable sources at least [[User:Thehistorianisaac|Thehistorianisaac]] ([[User talk:Thehistorianisaac|talk]]) 05:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:A Wikipedia article should consist almost entirely of a summary of what [[WP:42|reliable independent sources]] say about the subject. If you don't cite such sources, there can be no article. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 15:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 06:04, 20 January 2025 review of submission by Astroboy-tomorrow ==
{{Lafc|username=Astroboy-tomorrow|ts=06:04, 20 January 2025|draft=Draft:Giok_Djan_Khoe}}
How can I improve the draft Giok Djan Khoe ? [[User:Astroboy-tomorrow|Astroboy-tomorrow]] ([[User talk:Astroboy-tomorrow|talk]]) 06:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:The reviewer left you advice on your draft. It reads like a resume, not an encyclopedia article that summarizes what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] say about the professor, showing how he is [[WP:NACADEMIC|a notable academic]] or more broadly [[WP:BIO|a notable person]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 07:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 10:07, 20 January 2025 review of submission by Dhaanish Chennai ==
{{Lafc|username=Dhaanish Chennai|ts=10:07, 20 January 2025|draft=Dhaanish Chennai}}
I am the representative of the college I tried to Publish content about my College. I took the content from my college website dhaanishchennai.com but it is rejected due to copyright reason. What should I do now. [[User:Dhaanish Chennai|Dhaanish Chennai]] ([[User talk:Dhaanish Chennai|talk]]) 10:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Dhaanish Chennai|Dhaanish Chennai]]: the first thing you need to do is change your user name. The second, you must disclose your paid-editing status. I will post information on your talk page.
:You are not allowed to copypaste from external sources, including your organisation's own website. It clearly claims copyright, and you don't really want to be the one to trespass on your own rights, do you?
:In any case, we have no interest in what your organisation wants to say about itself. We almost exclusively only want to know what independent and reliable secondary sources have said about it. Therefore copypasting what it says on your website is pointless, even if you were to release it from copyright, because that wouldn't be an acceptable article no matter what. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 10:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 10:33, 20 January 2025 review of submission by Babu Rumba Tamang ==
{{Lafc|username=Babu Rumba Tamang|ts=10:33, 20 January 2025|draft=Draft:Babu_Rumba_Tamang}}
Chief Ass. Fight Director [[User:Babu Rumba Tamang|Babu Rumba Tamang]] ([[User talk:Babu Rumba Tamang|talk]]) 10:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell about themselves. Please see the [[WP:AUTO|Autobiography policy]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 10:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 12:56, 20 January 2025 review of submission by 202.47.46.54 ==
{{Lafc|username=202.47.46.54|ts=12:56, 20 January 2025|draft=Ayaz syed article}}
What i do for make perfect article [[Special:Contributions/202.47.46.54|202.47.46.54]] ([[User talk:202.47.46.54|talk]]) 12:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Please quit spamming us. Thank you. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 13:49, 20 January 2025 review of submission by Editorseditor15 ==
{{Lafc|username=Editorseditor15|ts=13:49, 20 January 2025|draft=Draft:Shaadaab_Shakoore}}
Hi, Greetings to you, and first of all, thank you for your assistance. I’ve been facing some challenges recently as I’ve been trying to find sources digitally, but unfortunately, many of them are unavailable. However, I do have access to some physical references, such as newspaper articles and similar materials from the early 2000s. The issue is that I’m unsure where to find these articles online since they were from a time when the digital landscape was just beginning to evolve. Additionally, I’m wondering if the physical articles I have could be of any help in this process. Would you recommend any particular approach for utilizing these resources, or should I focus on finding alternative digital sources instead? In short, could you please guide me on how to find reliable sources from that period? I truly appreciate your time and help with this. Thank you! [[User:Editorseditor15|Editorseditor15]] ([[User talk:Editorseditor15|talk]]) 13:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hi @[[User:Editorseditor15|Editorseditor15]]. The good news is that sources ''don't'' have to be online: you can use offline published sources (such as a newspaper article). As long as you provide a full reference to allow a reader to go to a library or archive and view the source if they so wish, then you can use an offline source.
:Regarding your draft, you right now have two styles of references and a long list of external links. You'll want to follow the referencing tutorial at [[WP:INTREFVE]] so you only have a single Reference List, with every reference being an in-line citation to the text it is supporting. In a biographic article it is mandatory that every piece of information has a reference with an in-line citation next to the information it is sourcing. Also remove most of the external links (see [[WP:EXTERNAL]] for our policy). <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 13:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 14:54, 20 January 2025 review of submission by JOien ==
{{Lafc|username=JOien|ts=14:54, 20 January 2025|draft=Draft:Daniel_Perry}}
Hello! I have recently been rejected for publishing this page and was wondering if anyone can give me advice and some direction to get it up to standard? It is my first ever page so would appreciate any help! Thanks so much in advance [[User:JOien|JOien]] ([[User talk:JOien|talk]]) 14:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:JOien|JOien]]: you need to demonstrate, with reliable evidence, that this person meets one or more of the criteria enumerated at [[WP:NACADEMIC]].
:Also, although it wasn't a reason for declining, I noticed that the draft is quite poorly referenced, with a lot of information that is not supported by citations. Articles on living people ([[WP:BLP]]) have especially strict referencing requirements, with pretty much every material statement you make needing an inline citation to a reliable source to support it. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 14:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you very much for this. I was wondering what to do if there is not a good source for referencing awards, memberships, grant funding etc, what should I do? I do appreciate that these claims need references but I am struggling to find a concrete one. Do you have recommendations as to where to get access to this information? Thanks you again. This has been very helpful! [[User:JOien|JOien]] ([[User talk:JOien|talk]]) 15:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:::@[[User:JOien|JOien]]: let me turn that around and ask you how ''you'' know about those things? Whatever your source for that information is, that's what you should be citing (assuming it's a published source and not hearsay etc.).
:::Ultimately, anything that cannot be backed up by a reliable published source must be removed. Weird as it might seem, we're less concerned by what is ''true'', and more interested in what can be ''verified'' from reliable sources. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
::::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]]: Thank you very much. I was stuggling as I could not get to the source of publishing as it was referenced and mentioned by those who he is associated with eg: universities. I have since made edits to my page and now believe that he may qualify as NACADEMIC and hence have less criteria to fulfil in terms of secondary sources so all should be resolved. Hoping this next submission goes ok! Thank you so much for your help though, it has been greatly appreciated! [[User:JOien|JOien]] ([[User talk:JOien|talk]]) 16:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 15:24, 20 January 2025 review of submission by Raskuly ==
{{Lafc|username=Raskuly|ts=15:24, 20 January 2025|draft=Draft:Colin_Guske}}
I submitted it to draft because I prefer it to be looked over before going live, but the article is basically just waiting to be created. Guske would be the only player on this team to not have an article and he'll be with the club at least until 2027. Do I have to wait for the [[2025 Major League Soccer season]] or [[2025 Orlando City SC season]] to begin? [[User:Raskuly|Raskuly]] ([[User talk:Raskuly|talk]]) 15:24, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Raskuly|Raskuly]]: in the past football players could qualify under a special notability guideline (WP:FOOTY, as it was) if they had played at a certain level, but this provision was removed some years ago. Players now must satisfy the general [[WP:GNG]] guideline, which requires significant coverage directly of them, in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and entirely independent. Match reports, player stats, sources affiliated with them (eg. club websites) etc. are not enough. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:32, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 15:32, 20 January 2025 review of submission by Mark-mcgdigital ==
{{Lafc|username=Mark-mcgdigital|ts=15:32, 20 January 2025|draft=User:Mark-mcgdigital/sandbox}}
My latest article has been rejected for unreliable citing source but it doesn't provide further information about which one? Are you able to provide further guidance? As all the sources are from sites which have been around for a while. I assumed that I had followed the guidelines to get this page up and running [[User:Mark-mcgdigital|Mark-mcgdigital]] ([[User talk:Mark-mcgdigital|talk]]) 15:32, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Mark-mcgdigital|Mark-mcgdigital]]: I actually mainly declined this for failure to show that the subject is [[WP:notable|notable]]. But I added the second decline reason because you're citing user-generated sources (LinkedIn, YouTube), as well as ''The Sun'' which is a deprecated source and mustn't be cited. There is also unreferenced personal information which needs to be supported with reliable published sources or else removed. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:Mark-mcgdigital|Mark-mcgdigital]]. Please read [[WP:42]]. Please also read [[WP:PEACOCK|PEACOCK]]. Vapid PR-speak like "proven track record" doesn't belong in any Wikipedia article. More generally, {{HD/WINI}}
:More generally still, trying to create an article when you've only just started editing Wikipedia is like entering a tournament the same day you first pick up a tennis racquet. {{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 15:41, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 15:46, 20 January 2025 review of submission by MJGTMKME123 ==
{{Lafc|username=MJGTMKME123|ts=15:46, 20 January 2025|draft=Draft:2015_DM319}}
Could you guys please expand the draft? [[User:MJGTMKME123|MJGTMKME123]] ([[User talk:MJGTMKME123|talk]]) 15:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:MJGTMKME123|MJGTMKME123]] we don't really get involved in co-editing, but with four good sources it would probably be accepted as a stub article if you submit it for review. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 15:48, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
::https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kepler-1229b/2015_DM319 nevermind, someone else made something similar before i did [[User:MJGTMKME123|MJGTMKME123]] ([[User talk:MJGTMKME123|talk]]) 15:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:::That's a userpage, so not an article. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 15:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
::::you meant a subpage [[User:MJGTMKME123|MJGTMKME123]] ([[User talk:MJGTMKME123|talk]]) 17:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::A subpage of a userpage :) <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 17:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::Exactly! That's what I thought of! [[User:MJGTMKME123|MJGTMKME123]] ([[User talk:MJGTMKME123|talk]]) 17:24, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::@[[User:MJGTMKME123|MJGTMKME123]]. The point is that @[[User:Kepler-1229b|Kepler-1229b]]'s page is not an article, even though it looks like one, as it has never been moved to mainspace or submitted for review. It won't be found by external search engines. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 19:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 16:37, 20 January 2025 review of submission by ScopeScience ==
{{Lafc|username=ScopeScience|ts=16:37, 20 January 2025|draft=Draft:Walter_E._Baethgen}}
Hi there!
Thank you so much for your feedback on my article. I really want to improve it so it can be acceptable in Wikipedia´s terms. Would you help me with that?
- When you say it´s more like an essay than a Wikipedia article, what do you mean? Which are the criteria for a Wikipedia article that this does not meet and thus makes it an essay?
- 25 selected publications it´s not appropriate. He has approximately 200 publications, how many would be appropriate?
- References were included, except for the personal stuff which honestly, I just know them because it´s a very small country but I have no written source for that. Should I exclude that?
- Any other amendment your think I should do to get the article approved?
Thank you so much for your help! [[User:ScopeScience|ScopeScience]] ([[User talk:ScopeScience|talk]]) 16:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:ScopeScience|ScopeScience]]. A Wikipedia article should be a summary of what [[WP:42|independent reliable sources]] have said about a subject - nothing less, and very little more. Which independent source says that he has "dedicated his career"? Which said he was "honored with a scholarship". Please read [[WP:PEACOCK]].
:{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 20:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 17:23, 20 January 2025 review of submission by NoirEditorial ==
{{Lafc|username=NoirEditorial|ts=17:23, 20 January 2025|draft=Draft:Bennie_Carew}}
I do not understand completely why the page cannot be published. I have given as much coverage of his life based on the very little information allocated to me. If anyone could please give me suggestions on how to get this page published that would be greatly appreciated. Bennie Carew was a legend in my hometown of Grand Rapids,MI and apart of highly under documented black American history. Thank you. [[User:NoirEditorial|NoirEditorial]] ([[User talk:NoirEditorial|talk]]) 17:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|NoirEditorial}} How much of your article is based strictly on what the two (malformatted; you're missing page numbers) sources say, and how much of it is [[WP:No original research|extrapolation from those]]? Your sources should ideally be in-line, rather than just slapped on the end as if an afterthought. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 17:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Unfortunately, subjects which are "undocumented" cannot be featured in Wikipedia, no matter how worthy, because [[WP:verifiability|verifiability]] is a core value of Wikipedia. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 20:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 17:52, 20 January 2025 review of submission by 2400:1A00:BB10:3C9B:B0FC:173D:92B7:9DA1 ==
{{Lafc|username=2400:1A00:BB10:3C9B:B0FC:173D:92B7:9DA1|ts=17:52, 20 January 2025|draft=User:Ramie0010/sandbox}}
can you suggest me on areas to improve so that the article made on raman gupta can be accepted. I want to know the areas lacking [[Special:Contributions/2400:1A00:BB10:3C9B:B0FC:173D:92B7:9DA1|2400:1A00:BB10:3C9B:B0FC:173D:92B7:9DA1]] ([[User talk:2400:1A00:BB10:3C9B:B0FC:173D:92B7:9DA1|talk]]) 17:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|Ramie0010}} This is blatantly promotional, and I have [[WP:G11|tagged it for deletion as such]]. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 17:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 18:19, 20 January 2025 review of submission by 96.249.215.37 ==
{{Lafc|username=96.249.215.37|ts=18:19, 20 January 2025|draft=User:Rockinsince97/sandbox}}
Hey there! I see that my page submission was declined. What can I do to edit the format to make this fit the standards of Wikipedia? [[Special:Contributions/96.249.215.37|96.249.215.37]] ([[User talk:96.249.215.37|talk]]) 18:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:<sub>Courtesy ping @[[User:Bobby Cohn|Bobby Cohn]] who rejected this back in August(!).</sub> <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 18:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
::Thanks @[[User:Qcne|Qcne]]. August, you say? Looks like I rejected on the basis of it being an apparent promotional autobiography, but it's possible that was heavy handed. If they're willing to work on it, I'll leave a note on the submitor's (IP's?) talk page and then resubmit it over my rejection if we can get it to an acceptable draft state. [[User:Bobby Cohn|Bobby Cohn]] ([[User talk:Bobby Cohn|talk]]) 18:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hello (I assume you're @[[User:Rockinsince97|Rockinsince97]]?) As far as I can see, not one of the sources in that draft meets the triple criteria of [[WP:42]]. {{HD/WINI}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 11:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
== 18:19, 20 January 2025 review of submission by EncyclopedianWP ==
{{Lafc|username=EncyclopedianWP|ts=18:19, 20 January 2025|draft=Draft:Comparison_of_association_football_and_beach_soccer}}
Recent request for creation rejected [[User:EncyclopedianWP|EncyclopedianWP]] ([[User talk:EncyclopedianWP|talk]]) 18:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Only declined, not rejected. A lot of this seems to be [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]], which we don't allow. Do you have sources that specifically discuss the differences? We'd prefer you source those. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 18:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 18:56, 20 January 2025 review of submission by Zayn Ayan ==
{{Lafc|username=Zayn Ayan|ts=18:56, 20 January 2025|draft=Draft:Syed_Fakher_E_Haider}}
I hope this message finds you well. I would appreciate it if you could kindly share the reason for the rejection of my article post. I am eager to learn and improve, and any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your time and consideration. [[User:Zayn Ayan|Zayn Ayan]] ([[User talk:Zayn Ayan|talk]]) 18:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hi @[[User:Zayn Ayan|Zayn Ayan]], we only have articles about people who [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|meet our special definition of a notable person]]. Syed does not meet that threshold. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 20:22, 20 January 2025 review of submission by LommyLoaf ==
{{Lafc|username=LommyLoaf|ts=20:22, 20 January 2025|draft=User:LommyLoaf/sandbox}}
Hi!
Can someone please tell me how to put a reference down? I used ufbobkingdom.org, and tried to put it down but it did not work. Please respond!
Thanks. [[User:LommyLoaf|LommyLoaf]] ([[User talk:LommyLoaf|talk]]) 20:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hi @[[User:LommyLoaf|LommyLoaf]], I am afraid your draft has been rejected and won't be considered further. Please go to an alternative website like [https://micronations.wiki/wiki/Main_Page]https://micronations.wiki/wiki/Main_Page <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 21:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
::can you at least tell me how to put a reference down? I did not ask for a opnion with all due respect [[User:LommyLoaf|LommyLoaf]] ([[User talk:LommyLoaf|talk]]) 22:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:::{{ping|LommyLoaf}} [[Help:Referencing for beginners]]. But without [[WP:Reliable sources|third-party sources with editorial oversight]] this article's trapped in the draft warren. And I'm [[WP:BEFORE|not seeing any sources that we can actually use]] in a Google search (string: "United Federation of Big Old Bunny"). —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 22:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
::::If you search up the exact words: ufbobkingdom.org you will get a an exact replica of a search [[User:LommyLoaf|LommyLoaf]] ([[User talk:LommyLoaf|talk]]) 22:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::That would just point me to their website, which is useless for [[WP:Notability|notability as Wikipedia defines it]] ([[WP:PRIMARY|connexion to subject]]). A Google search would actually have a chance at finding sources. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 22:44, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:::It's rather immaterial due to the rejection, but you can follow the referencing tutorial at [[WP:INTREFVE]] if you decide to contribute further to Wikipedia with more appropriate topics. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 22:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
::::What do you mean? I literally just started using Wikipedia yesterday and have no idea of what I am doing [[User:LommyLoaf|LommyLoaf]] ([[User talk:LommyLoaf|talk]]) 22:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::Then, I would really suggest having an explore of [[WP:INTRODUCTION]] to get acquainted with how to use Wikipedia. We're an encyclopedia of notable topics, not a place to host things you've made up. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 22:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 20:45, 20 January 2025 review of submission by AngelicaMonsalud ==
{{Lafc|username=AngelicaMonsalud|ts=20:45, 20 January 2025|draft=User:AngelicaMonsalud/sandbox}}
Hi team,
I’m wondering why my article keeps getting rejected. I’ve included all the necessary references and links, but it still hasn't been accepted. Could you please provide some feedback or guidance on what needs improvement?
Thank you. [[User:AngelicaMonsalud|AngelicaMonsalud]] ([[User talk:AngelicaMonsalud|talk]]) 20:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:The draft was declined, and then rejected, which means resubmission is not possible. I would suggest asking the reviewer if anything might change their mind. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 21:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
== 21:08, 20 January 2025 review of submission by Helmut.groetzi-genf ==
{{Lafc|username=Helmut.groetzi-genf|ts=21:08, 20 January 2025|draft=Draft:Roberto_Stefan_Foa}}
I submitted this bio entry after it was redlinked for addition by another editor, as one in a list of the top most cited scholars in his department. Recently it was declined due to concerns about sources hence I contacted the declining editor but did not get a reply. I do notice some sources were added by others after my original submission, but am not sure which are an issue, so could use some guidance on which to update prior to resubmission. [[User:Helmut.groetzi-genf|Helmut.groetzi-genf]] ([[User talk:Helmut.groetzi-genf|talk]]) 21:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Helmut.groetzi-genf|Helmut.groetzi-genf]] I think you have created [[WP:BOMBARD]], and concealed any notability he may have behind a welter of references. Thirty two references for two brief paragraphs is overkill. You haven't presented him yet as notable. 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 22:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:Helmut.groetzi-genf|Helmut.groetzi-genf]]. {{HD/WINI}} Most of your references are to material ''by'' Foa. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 11:30, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
== 21:52, 20 January 2025 review of submission by Helloyesgoodbye ==
{{Lafc|username=Helloyesgoodbye|ts=21:52, 20 January 2025|draft=Draft:Isaac_Dunmall}}
Have updated and improved content of post [[User:Helloyesgoodbye|Helloyesgoodbye]] ([[User talk:Helloyesgoodbye|talk]]) 21:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:If you believe you have fundamentally changed the draft to address the concerns of reviewers, you should first appeal to the rejecting reviewer directly. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 22:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
::Please note that Linkedin.com is NOT a reliable source. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 22:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:Please review each of your sources according to the triple criteria in [[WP:42]]. On I quick look, I doubt that any of them meet the criteria. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 11:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
= January 21 =
== 00:40, 21 January 2025 review of submission by HWBK - R ==
{{Lafc|username=HWBK - R|ts=00:40, 21 January 2025|draft=User:HWBK - R/sandbox}}
Hi there, my page got declined and I have read the feedback and submitted a new request. However, it is still just showing that my old request is declined! Is this normal? [[User:HWBK - R|HWBK - R]] ([[User talk:HWBK - R|talk]]) 00:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|HWBK - R}}Yes. Declined reviews must remain in place while the page is still a draft. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 00:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:HWBK - R|HWBK - R]] I do not see that you have resubmitted it for review? 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 00:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{HD/WINI}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 11:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
== 00:59, 21 January 2025 review of submission by 159.118.104.110 ==
{{Lafc|username=159.118.104.110|ts=00:59, 21 January 2025|draft=Draft:Hamilton_the_bearded_dragon.}}
because it is SUCh the greatest article and so important to learn about mah bearded dragon hamilton!! I love him sooo much and I want other people to love him too. [[Special:Contributions/159.118.104.110|159.118.104.110]] ([[User talk:159.118.104.110|talk]]) 00:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
:[[WP:Notability|We do not have articles on random people's pets or companion animals.]] —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 01:01, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
== 01:17, 21 January 2025 review of submission by 2001:8F8:1427:1B1B:BBFE:59C4:5A1E:E03B ==
{{Lafc|username=2001:8F8:1427:1B1B:BBFE:59C4:5A1E:E03B|ts=01:17, 21 January 2025|draft=Draft:Acharya_Kompella_Rama_Suryanarayana}}
Acharya Kompella Rama Suryanarayana is one of the greatest Sanskrit Scholars from South India, Tirupati. He got Award from President of India for his valuable works. Help me to bring this article to Wikipedia standards to be approved for publishing [[Special:Contributions/2001:8F8:1427:1B1B:BBFE:59C4:5A1E:E03B|2001:8F8:1427:1B1B:BBFE:59C4:5A1E:E03B]] ([[User talk:2001:8F8:1427:1B1B:BBFE:59C4:5A1E:E03B|talk]]) 01:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
:Not only is your [[WP:Verifiability|sourcing]] [[WP:Reliable sources|not up]] [[WP:Biographies of living persons|to standards]], this is effectively a [[hagiography|hagiographical]] [[curriculum vitae]]. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 01:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
== 05:30, 21 January 2025 review of submission by Swathy Selvaraj ==
{{Lafc|username=Swathy Selvaraj|ts=05:30, 21 January 2025|draft=Draft:WestFax}}
is it compulsory for adding refernces in the article? [[User:Swathy Selvaraj|Swathy Selvaraj]] ([[User talk:Swathy Selvaraj|talk]]) 05:30, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{u|Swathy Selvaraj}} Yes, references are compulsory. A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] say about(in this case) a company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:ORG|a notable company]]. As noted by the reviewer, you haven't shown that the company is notable yet. Press releases are not an independent source, and the reporting of routine business activities(like the release of a product) does not establish notability. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 07:14, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
== 08:07, 21 January 2025 review of submission by Math1um ==
{{Lafc|username=Math1um|ts=08:07, 21 January 2025|draft=Draft:M. Sean Grady}}
The given source is a Nobel Prize winner's autobiography. I'm a scientist and rarely edit - and will let this drop (due to lack of time).
The person (Grady) is far more important than most scientists on Wikipedia, and the issue with Kariko (discoverer of mRNA vaccines) is one of the biggest issues in science - valuing bureaucracy and grant money over the search for truth. Kariko has called Grady out - and this should be recorded. [[User:Math1um|Math1um]] ([[User talk:Math1um|talk]]) 08:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{u|Math1um}} I fixed your post, the whole url is not needed. You're either going to let this drop or you're not- if you're not, you need more independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage of this person. If you are, nothing more needs to be done here. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 08:14, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
== 09:30, 21 January 2025 review of submission by 139.164.154.26 ==
{{Lafc|username=139.164.154.26|ts=09:30, 21 January 2025|draft=Draft:The_realm_of_Aetheria}}
I have changed the page and i realised that it was simiular to the Aetherian Wiki, and i have not known it exsisted so because of that mistake i have then changed it so it is not asosiated with the Aetherian Wiki in any way. [[Special:Contributions/139.164.154.26|139.164.154.26]] ([[User talk:139.164.154.26|talk]]) 09:30, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
:That's not a question, did you have one in mind? This draft has been rejected, which means that it won't be considered further. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 09:44, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
== 09:36, 21 January 2025 review of submission by Anastasia Kireeva ==
{{Lafc|username=Anastasia Kireeva|ts=09:36, 21 January 2025|draft=Draft:Customertimes}}
Dear Wiki Community, could you please help me with my article? I guess I'm stuck with the resources list. I would be very grateful for your advice. [[User:Anastasia Kireeva|Anastasia Kireeva]] ([[User talk:Anastasia Kireeva|talk]]) 09:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Anastasia Kireeva|Anastasia Kireeva]]: please be more specific, what sort of help do you require? -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 09:44, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
== 09:46, 21 January 2025 review of submission by BPSkantze ==
{{Lafc|username=BPSkantze|ts=09:46, 21 January 2025|draft=Draft:Margareta_Skantze}}
Could you please help me understand what alterations
should make in order to get this website accepted. [[User:BPSkantze|BPSkantze]] ([[User talk:BPSkantze|talk]]) 09:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
:Please address your conflict of interest first as evidenced by your user name. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 10:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
== 09:56, 21 January 2025 review of submission by ItsQPC ==
{{Lafc|username=ItsQPC|ts=09:56, 21 January 2025|draft=Draft:Medical Country }}
Please [[CBS]] i wanna wait for [[S.W.A.T. (2017 TV series)|S.W.A.T.]] next [[Medical Country]] [[User:ItsQPC|ItsQPC]] ([[User talk:ItsQPC|talk]]) 09:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
:Do you have a single reference that this actually exists? [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] ([[User talk:CoffeeCrumbs|talk]]) 10:47, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
This entry was moved to draft space by OwenX who acknowledged its improvement after several weeks of edits and added citations, writing "I see you've made significant improvements to the draft, both in content and in sourcing" [[User talk: OwenX#Review for Dr. Mike Abrams (psychologist)]]. I invite anyone to suggest or make improvements or who may feel it is ready to return as an entry where it previously was for several years. [[User:Psymba|Psymba]] ([[User talk:Psymba|talk]]) 15:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
== 11:51, 21 January 2025 review of submission by Github-Project ==
{{Lafc|username=Github-Project|ts=11:51, 21 January 2025|draft=User:Github-Project/sandbox}}
My article, 'The Future of Email and Decentralized Messaging,' was declined due to insufficient references. I would like guidance on how to properly source my content and meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Any tips on improving the article to meet the required standards would be appreciated. [[User:Github-Project|Github-Project]] ([[User talk:Github-Project|talk]]) 11:51, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
| 