Content deleted Content added
MartinBotIII (talk | contribs) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 78:
Is Wikipedia or yourself willing to host or archive the cited sources I have? B/c, if not, I'm in a lose-lose situation when the information is entirely factual. I purposely with held names of the administration to avoid "singling out". I'm as unbias as they come, but after experiencing the situation personally I have as much right to convey the facts as I saw them cut-dry-and-clear. It was not meant to be a personal attack. Also the "Heavy Criticism" area was not added by me, but was entirely factual or at least very undeniably the intrepretation expressed by the main consensus - Do not censor people's right to have an opinion about what they witnessed in an majority.
:Please do not let your biasness influence your decision to remove these areas.
:I failed to clarify what I meant by cited sources. Not to take a stance of paranoia and so on, I have cited sources from the staff/administration themselves. It is simply the fact I know they will eventually visit this wiki page and remove the instances [on their end], they themselves admit to. There are numerous blogs citings owned by the staff admitting their mistakes and further cited information made public by the staff. This is not some "research compiled by disgruntled TV Tome users". Would you get off that horse already? It's never coming back. The bit I sent was merely an attempt to incorporate history with fact and mix it with the present, rather giving further an explanation of why so many guides are editorless, seemingly have an editor but no real activity, etc. A problem that is on going to this day. This is amounting of a historical trek of how far TV.com will come, let's say 3 years down the road from now. The inital problems have to be documented, then as time goes on the corrections and improvements to the site have to be equally be noted. This will serve as a time-table basis of how efficiently demands/suggestions were met, and overall how many problems have been addressed. To say any site is free of error, is ludicrous. Have you visited IMDB.com?
:If you'd like I could add a History section too? No, not documenting TV Tome, but referring to effects currently experienced by users @ TV.com. Are you even registered there? You must recognize some of the problems previously documented before my excerpt. Do not discern upon yourself to say what is fact, and what is not. There is credible evidence, I just know when I present it you're going to try to remove it anyway.
== Numbers ==
Line 132:
== Tv.com ==
As I've stated before to Perfecto, how the hell can I give you people a creditable source when the majority of this happened behind closed doors, and you already told me that all the proof I gave you once before in the talk page about Tv.com (that came directly off their website) wasn't allowed. I find it bullshit that every modirator allowed these people to raise hell with everything involving their website on here. When we tried to prove that they were full of crap, we were told we needed more proof. And when we asked for them to show records and proof that we were lying, they couldn't. AND YOU STILL TOOK THEIR WORD OVER OURS. Plus, not only are we not allowed to post the truth about them, but we can't even have a listing for alternative websites like EpGuides.com and TvRage.com. If you're going to keep this up and only take the point of view of the bigger sites around here, then I see no reason to discuss it any further. It's already been establised that the mods here think we're full of shit.
== Lost trivia ==
I added an item of Trivia that you reverted referring to a scene in the episode "Fire & Water" as it may have future consequences. I, also, realise that it may, just, be a continuity error. If, at the current time, we do not have a definitive answer who decides whether it is a valid item of trivia?
== Would you mind handling [[User:67.80.3.198]] again? ==
Line 196:
Hey. I went ahead and reverted your post-speedy deletion blanking of the [[Paula Hart]] AfD, and closed it with the appropriate comment. You don't have to blank your AfD noms if the article in question is speedied; speedy deletion is also an appropriate AfD closure, and should get noted to avoid confusion :)
Thanks for helping to keep Wikipedia tidy!
== re:AutoAFD script ==
When put into your JS file at [[User:Jtrost/monobook.css]] (assuming you set your skin to monobook in [[Special:Preferences|preferences]]) it creates an afd tab on the top bar which if clicked when on an article adds the afd template to the top of the article and in a seperate window creates the proper AFD subpage with the default template already in place ready for you to fill in the details. It also opens up a new window with the current daily listings subpage to which it adds the subpage name. All you have to do at that point is to add your reasoning to the afd page (and press save) and press save on both the listings page and the article page windows. It just greatly simplifies the process of putting up an AFD. <small>[[User:Jtkiefer|<
== Sayid's age ==
Line 217:
==Gight==
hi - ive just changed the stub template you put on [[gight]]. unless you want to start riots i suggest you use {{tl|scotland-geo-stub}} not {{tl|england-geo-stub}} for places in aberdeenshire! :) <small><i>[[User:BL Lacertae|<
:lets just say its like saying montreal is in the usa. <small><i>[[User:BL Lacertae|<
== TV.com Citing ==
Line 234:
== Lost reruns ==
the reruns are a very serious issue and they shouldn't be disregarded like that. many lost fans are upset over the reruns! how hard is it to figure out?
== Minor Edits ==
Line 246:
theres tons of links all over wikipedia to personal fan sites.. like this from the Jack Bauer page:
Blogs 4 Bauer <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:24.126.212.119|24.126.212.119]] ([[User talk:24.126.212.119|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/24.126.212.119|contribs]]) March 1, 2006</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
== Re: Thanks ==
Line 274:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000EBCJN6/qid=1141550290/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl/026-2055057-5702809
http://www.dvd.co.uk/product.asp?id=3300701000
== [[Criticism of Family Guy]] ==
Line 343:
: Hehe it seems you kinda contradicted yourself there, you think it's not inappropiate but beleive it was. o_O Don't worry about that, we don't need to discuss personal beliefs (sp?). However I would like to point out that that is how wikis work. You should be aware that your contributions will be edited boldly by others. It is even given as a warning when you edit an article: "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it."
: Anyways, back to the point. I haven't modified a whole category of articles, I beleive this has been a misunderstanding regarding the <
: How about this, we can remove the <
: I didn't create [[List of Lost episodes]] nor the individual articles of each episodes and I have no problem whatsoever with other editors wishing to maintain a list of episodes per category. I only want a [[List of Lost episodes]] similar to [[List of South Park episodes]] and each episode having its own article. If you want to maintain an article such as [[Episodes of Lost (season 1)]] and [[Episodes of Lost (season 2)]] then please feel free to do so.
Line 416:
==Widmore==
Why do you want to delete the [[Widmore]] article? I may could understand merging it with another Lost related article, but I don't think it should be deleted.
== Rose & Bernard ==
Line 539:
== Request for Mediation ==
A [[WP:RFM|request for mediation]] has been filed with the [[WP:MC|Mediation Committee]] that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/List of Lost Episodes]], and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to [[Wikipedia:Mediation]]. '''There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.'''
== [[Big Love]] ==
| |||