Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Display:none exploit: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Display:none exploit]]: Delete |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. --[[User:Coredesat|Core]][[User talk:Coredesat|<span style="color:#006449;">desat</span>]] 07:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
===[[Display:none exploit]]===
:{{la|Display:none exploit}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Display:none exploit|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 May 2#{{anchorencode:Display:none exploit}}|View log]])</noinclude>
no reference for 2 years. can't find a page from google about this exploit. i think that search engines are smart enough to ignore invisible elements. one more point is that if html isn't converted, why doesn't the user just post javascript? [[User:Fiveship|Fiveship]] 09:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Line 6 ⟶ 13:
*'''Delete'''. This is not a vulnerability/attack. What's next? The img "exploit" that allows websites to display goatse to its visitors? :) --- [[User:RockMFR|RockMFR]] 14:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' This isn't an exploit per-se. It's a technique that was once widely used ''as part'' of some exploits and by SEO companies/link spammers (just like using text-indent et al. to have content rendered but not displayed). The fact that the article doesn't make this obvious is quite telling, in my humble opinion. Anyway, it's pretty much a non-issue and I feel the technique in itself isn't notable enough, not to mention that fact that the article is completely unsourced. [[User:Seed 2.0|Seed 2.0]] 21:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''; no sources, so the article fails [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]]. <span style="border: #AAF solid 4px; background: #11E; padding: 1px; margin-right: .5em;">[[User talk:Crotalus horridus|<
*'''Delete''', it's not an 'exploit' but rather a method of [[keyword stuffing]], and that page already mentions the use of CSS to hide keywords. -- [[User:Mithent|Mithent]] 14:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. No sources, not verifiable, no content, no context and inaccurate (not an exploit). In what way was this article encyclopedia-worthy again? --[[User:Tinctorius|Tinctorius]] 22:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom, yet another good find. [[User:RFerreira|RFerreira]] 07:12, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||