Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia technical issues and templates: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Legobot (talk | contribs)
Legobot (talk | contribs)
 
(23 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2:
{{rfclistintro}}
</noinclude>
'''[[WikipediaTemplate talk:UserTalk pagesheader#rfc_D30CFB8rfc_75DFAF6|WikipediaTemplate talk:UserTalk pagesheader]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
ShouldWhich [[WT:Userof pages#Proposed wording|the following [[tooltip]]s should be addedused ason athe sectionsmall atlist {{slink|Wikipedia:Userof pages|What may I havearchives in mythe user{{tl|talk pages?header}}, whichtemplate? allows[[User:Aaron editorsLiu|<span to optclass="skin-out of seeing floating decorative elements? <spaninvert" style="displaycolor:inline-block;#0645ad">[[User:HouseBlaster|House]][[Special:ContribsAaron Liu</HouseBlaster|'''Blaster'''span>]] ([[User talk:HouseBlasterAaron Liu#top|talk]] • he/they)</span> 2300:0257, 1626 MarchAugust 2025 (UTC)}}
'''[[TemplateWikipedia talk:RedirectWikiProject Articles for discussioncreation#rfc_3C61BFDrfc_7AE6347|TemplateWikipedia talk:RedirectWikiProject Articles for discussioncreation]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
This question is about the terminology to be used when a draft is not accepted but may be reworked or improved and resubmitted. This action is currently referred to in the AFC Helper script and at the messages provided to the author as being '''Declined'''. There has been discussion at the Village Pump at [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#Declined_vs_rejected_at_AfC]]. Should the terminology for the three possible actions by a reviewer be:
Someone removed {{tl|rfd}} from [[Joshua Sturm]] prior to the [[Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2025 February 19#Joshua Sturm (musician)|RFD]] discussion being closed (not to mention moving that redirect prior to adjudication). I tried to list this [[Template_talk:Redirect_for_discussion#Can_"do_not_remove_this_notice_before_the_discussion_is_closed"_be_added?|above]], but doing so did not gain a great deal of traction.
*'''A''' - '''Accepted''', '''Declined''', and '''Rejected'''? (The present options)
*'''B''' - '''Accepted''', '''Not Accepted''', and '''Rejected'''? (The rough consensus at [[WP:VPM|VPM]])
*'''C''' - Something else, please specify.
 
Should "do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed" be added to {{tl|Redirect for discussion}}, similar to {{tl|Article for deletion}}? --[[User:JaxRobert 0677McClenon|JaxRobert 0677McClenon]] ([[User talk:JaxRobert 0677McClenon|talk]]) 0718:4737, 287 FebruaryAugust 2025 (UTC)}}
'''[[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#rfc_54A0047|Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
Should bots like Citation bot be allowed to remove redundant 'raw' [[PubMed]] URLs, and raw [[OCLC]] URLs when pmid/oclc identifiers are present. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 09:25, 17 February 2025 (UTC)}}
{{RFC list footer|tech|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }}