API: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:46, 27 May 2025

Latest revision as of 04:31, 28 August 2025

(34 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)

Line 76:

}}

</ref>

===Operating systems===

Line 82 ⟶ 83:

[[Linux]] and [[Berkeley Software Distribution]] are examples of operating systems that implement the POSIX APIs.<ref name="WestDedrick16">{{Cite journal |last1=West |first1=Joel |last2=Dedrick |first2=Jason |date=2001 |title=Open source standardization: the rise of Linux in the network era |url=http://www.joelwest.org/Papers/WestDedrick2001b.pdf |journal=Knowledge, Technology & Policy |volume=14 |issue=2 |pages=88–112 |doi=10.1007/PL00022278 |access-date=2 August 2016}}</ref>

[[Microsoft]] has shown a strong commitment to a backward-compatible API, particularly within its [[Windows API]] (Win32) library, so older applications may run on newer versions of Windows using an executable-specific setting called "Compatibility Mode".<ref>

{{cite web

|author=Microsoft

Line 93 ⟶ 94:

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090926235439/http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/helpandsupport/learnmore/appcompat.mspx

|archive-date=2009-09-26

}}</ref> How much Microsoft developers' access to the company's operating systems' internal APIs is an advantage is unclear. Richard A. Shaffer of ''Technologic Computer Letter'' in 1987 compared the situation to a baseball game in which "Microsoft owns all the bats and the field",<ref name="barney19871102">{{Cite magazine |last=Barney |first=Douglas |date=1987-11-02 |title=Balancing on the high wire of Microsoft's success |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mUSIMiurpfYC&pg=PP81 |access-date=2025-06-08 |magazine=Computerworld |page=SR15 |volume=XXI |issue=44}}</ref> but [[Ed Esber]] of [[Ashton-Tate]] said in an interview that year that [[Bill Gates]] told him that his developers sometimes had to rewrite software based on early APIs. Gates noted in the interview that Microsoft's [[Apple Macintosh]] applications were more successful than those for MS-DOS, because his company did not have to also devote resources to [[Classic Mac OS|Mac OS]].<ref name="computerworld19871102interview">{{Cite interview |last=Gates |first=Bill |interviewer=Paul Gillin |title=The great software debate |last2=Manzi |first2=Jim |last3=Esber |first3=Ed |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mUSIMiurpfYC&pg=PP73 |access-date=2025-06-08 |work=Computerworld |issue=44 |date=1987-11-02 |page=SR7 |volume=XXI}}</ref>

}}</ref>

An API differs from an [[application binary interface]] (ABI) in that an API is source code based while an ABI is [[Binary file|binary]] based. For instance, [[POSIX]] provides APIs while the [[Linux Standard Base]] provides an ABI.<ref>{{cite web|

Line 258 ⟶ 259:

*[[Comparison of application virtual machines]]

*[[Document Object Model]] (DOM)

*[[Double-chance function]]

*[[Foreign function interface]]

*[[Front and back ends]]