Content deleted Content added
m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot. |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Added url. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | Linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Sandbox | #UCB_webform_linked 480/1032 |
||
Line 1:
[[Usability testing]] methods aim to evaluate the ease of use of a software product by its users. As existing methods are subjective and open to interpretation, scholars have been studying the efficacy of each method
<ref>Genise, Pauline (August 28, 2002.). "Usability Evaluation: Methods and Techniques". University of Texas</ref>
<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Dhouib|first1=A.|last2=Trabelsi|first2=Abdelwaheb|last3=Kolski|first3=C.|last4=Neji|first4=M.|title=2016 9th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI) |chapter=A classification and comparison of usability evaluation methods for interactive adaptive systems |date=2016|chapter-url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7529639|pages=246–251|doi=10.1109/HSI.2016.7529639|isbn=978-1-5090-1729-4|s2cid=19110009|url=https://uphf.hal.science/hal-03350233 |access-date=2021-02-07|archive-date=2021-02-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210214114313/https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7529639|url-status=live}}</ref>
<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hocko|first=Jennifer M.|date=2002|title=Reliability of Usability Evaluation Methods|url=http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/citations;jsessionid=C5845D40ECD67930411AE8996F45674D?doi=10.1.1.131.243}}</ref>
and their adequacy to different subjects, comparing which one may be the most appropriate in fields like e-learning,
| |||