m The second equation in the derivation was inconsistent with the second recurrence relation right above the section, i.e. a P was used in the recurrence relation in place of a T. It's easy to check that the latter is correct, so I fixed that mistake. |
m Reverted edit by 186.177.184.151 (talk) to last version by Weberjoh |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
(No difference)
| |||
