Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia proposals: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:01, 19 June 2025

Latest revision as of 06:01, 1 September 2025

(32 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 2:

{{rfclistintro}}

</noinclude>

'''[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee Elections December 2025#rfc_0349424|Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee Elections December 2025]]'''

'''[[Talk:Pope Leo XIV#rfc_226E820|Talk:Pope Leo XIV]]'''

{{rfcquote|text=

The purpose of this '''[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment|request for comment]]''' is to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2025|December 2025 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election]]''' and resolve any issues not covered by the [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee Elections/ACERFC decisions to date|existing rules]]. 05:44, 1 September 2025 (UTC)}}

'''[[Wikipedia:Village pump (WMFproposals)#rfc_679849Brfc_BBD4CC3|Wikipedia:Village pump (WMFproposals)]]'''

Should the introduction use a '''comma''' or a '''semi-colon''' between the birth name and the birth date? 13:45, 19 June 2025 (UTC)}}

'''[[Wikipedia talk:Featured article criteria#rfc_76423A4|Wikipedia talk:Featured article criteria]]'''

{{rfcquote|text=

Should the Contents link be removed from the sidebar? [[User:Interstellarity|Interstellarity]] ([[User talk:Interstellarity|talk]]) 13:20, 22 August 2025 (UTC)}}

Should understandability be added to the featured article criteria? And if so, which wording should be used?

'''[[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#rfc_D90E1F5|Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)]]'''

# It should be added to the well-written criterion as

## '''well-written''': its prose is engaging, [[WP:MTAU|understandable]] to a broad audience, and of a professional standard;

## '''well-written''': its prose is engaging, [[WP:MTAU|understandable]] to its [[WP:audience|audience]], and of a professional standard;

# It should be a separate criterion: 1g. '''[[WP:MTAU|Understandable]]''' to its [[WP:audience|audience]].

# Status quo: no explicit mention

[[User:Femke|—Femke 🐦]] ([[User talk:Femke|talk]]) 11:45, 15 June 2025 (UTC)}}

'''[[Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#rfc_679849B|Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)]]'''

{{rfcquote|text=

We had an RFC earlier this year around how to handle LLM/AI generated comments. That resulted in [[WP:HATGPT]] after further discussion at [[WT:TPG]]. Recently, an editor [[Special:Diff/1304748131|started a requested move using LLM generated content]]. I ran that content through two different AI/LLM detection utilities: GPT Zero says "highly confident", and 100% AI generated; Quillbot stated 72% of the text was likely AI generated.

Should the English Wikipedia community adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and affiliates?

Should HATGPT be expanded to allow for the closure of discussions seeking community input (RFC/VPR/CENT/RFAR/AFD/RM/TFD/RFD/FFD/etc) that are started utilizing content that registers as being majority written by AI?

This is a statement-and-agreement-style RfC. 05:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC)}}

I was tempted to just start an RFC on this, but if there's alternate proposals or an existing [[WP:PAG]] that already covers this, I'm all ears. =) —[[User:Locke Cole|Locke Cole]] • [[User talk:Locke Cole|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Locke Cole|c]] 00:38, 12 August 2025 (UTC)}}

'''[[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#rfc_F2BDF5D|Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)]]'''

{{rfcquote|text=

Should the icons in the [[Module:Message box/configuration|message box module]] be updated from the current Ambox ones to the Codex ones? 13:56, 11 August 2025 (UTC)}}

{{RFC list footer|prop|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }}