Talk:Lisp (programming language): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 04:35, 27 June 2025 edit Cobalt pen (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,645 edits →LISP "Logo" ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 13:38, 5 August 2025 edit undo Widefox (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 110,634 edits Assessment: banner shell, Computing, −Computer science (Rater)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: {{WikiProject banner shell\|class=B\|vital=yes\|1= {{WikiProject Computing\|importance=~~mid~~Mid\|software=yes\|software-importance=High\|science=yes\|science-importance=High}} ~~{{WikiProject Computer science\|importance=High}}~~ }} {{archives}} Line 587 ⟶ 586: ::* My question is rather: Do we want the template to be used to graphically enhance the top of the article and interpret the logo field this way, yes or no. ::I'm not here to claim a non-existing logo. To the contrary. Please see my attempt to clarify the field's use in the template's definition. If we want to stay with your interpretation, i.e. a logo is a logo is a logo, then the [[Cobol]] use of the template would be wrong. ::Hope it makes my intention clearer. @{{Reply to\|Quale,}} Please understand, that you reverted the "logo" in Lisp, but not the related note in the template. Can we come to some conclusion here? Please don't duck away saying it is another ~~articles~~article's problem. How to cope with the template? -- [[User:Cobalt pen\|Cobalt pen]] ([[User talk:Cobalt pen\|talk]]) 04:22, 27 June 2025 (UTC)