|
__TOC__
{{clear}}
== Template-protected edit request on 18 June 2025: uw-delete series == ▼
{{edit template-protected|Template:Uw-delete4im|answered=y}} ▼Add link to [[WP:Content removal]] on {{tl|Uw-delete4im}}:
{{stringdiff|remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia|[[WP:Content removal|remove or blank page contents or templates]] from Wikipedia}}
Same for all the other uw-delete templates:
{{tl|uw-delete4}}
{{stringdiff|remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]|[[WP:Content removal|remove or blank page content or templates]] from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]}}
{{tl|uw-delete3}}
{{stringdiff|blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation|[[WP:Content removal|blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials]] from Wikipedia without adequate explanation}}
{{tl|uw-delete2}}
{{stringdiff|Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]].|Please do not [[WP:Content removal|remove content or templates]] from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]].}}
{{tl|uw-delete1}} already has this link.
— [[User:W.andrea|W.andrea]] ([[User talk:W.andrea|talk]]) 21:22, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
:[[File:X mark.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now''': please establish a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for this alteration '''[[Wikipedia:Edit requests#Planning a request|before]]''' using the {{Tlx|Edit template-protected}} template.<!-- Template:ETp --> [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago|talk]]) 00:26, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
::Oh, I thought this would be totally uncontroversial since it's just adding a link and {{tl|uw-delete1}} already includes it. No? — [[User:W.andrea|W.andrea]] ([[User talk:W.andrea|talk]]) 00:41, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
:::I think there may be an argument that editors receiving beyond a Level 1 warning for this shouldn't need a link of this nature. It's arguably linking an easily understandable phrase. [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago|talk]]) 19:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
::::{{tqbm|linking an easily understandable phrase}} My rationale for linking it isn't "this could be misunderstood", it's "we have a page that provides more details about this". — [[User:W.andrea|W.andrea]] ([[User talk:W.andrea|talk]]) 00:34, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
::::{{tqbm|editors receiving beyond a Level 1 warning for this shouldn't need a link of this nature.}} Note that {{tl|Uw-delete4im}} is an "only warning" so editors wouldn't have received a level 1 warning. — [[User:W.andrea|W.andrea]] ([[User talk:W.andrea|talk]]) 00:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
:::::I'm not sure why anyone would be delivering an "only warning" if an editor hadn't been warned about the same behavior in the past. [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago|talk]]) 03:27, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
::::::An "{{em|only}} warning" means they only get one warning. Are you thinking of a {{em|final}} warning?
::::::If it helps, I issued an only warning on the 18th because a user out of the blue removed a large chunk of the article [[Tuvan throat singing]], marked it as "minor", didn't write adequate edit summaries, and seemed to be specifically erasing the contributions of Mongolians.
::::::— [[User:W.andrea|W.andrea]] ([[User talk:W.andrea|talk]]) 12:50, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
:::::::No, I'm not. I don't think editors typically issue only warnings to editors who have never received warnings previously, unless whatever they did to merit the warning is so incredibly blatant and unambiguous that it's simply impossible to believe the editor didn't know it would be considered problematic.
:::::::In the case you described, if they had no prior warnings on their Talk page, I'd probably still give them a level 3 or 4 for a first-time offense. Either one is significant enough to result in a block if they continue their behavior. [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago|talk]]) 15:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
::::::::OK, I see. — [[User:W.andrea|W.andrea]] ([[User talk:W.andrea|talk]]) 17:38, 21 June 2025 (UTC) ▼:{{done}} Consensus to me is not obvious here, but I'm honestly not really convinced about not adding this link based on it possibly being the case a user has gotten the 1st version. I regularly issue first-time warnings between 1 and 4 and I think it's fair to provide editors (GF or BF) the opportunity to understand what they're doing in our context. Boldly added. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 22:37, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
== Requesting for [[Draft:Template:Mehasana|Template:Mehasana]] ==
{{Archive top
|status = Asked elsewhere
|result = Already asked and answered on other noticeboards <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 13:23, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
}}
Dear Sir,
I am requesting you to create the Template for Mahesana district. I already created, but need your help to make it meaningful.
Thank you,
~ [[User:Rahulkrsah|Rahulkrsah]] ([[User talk:Rahulkrsah|talk]]) 13:13, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
{{Archive bottom}}
== Uw-error templates ==
First of all, I am interested in your feedback: whether you have noticed anything like what I am describing, and how you have dealt with it. Secondly, I am considering creating a new [[WP:WARN|advice template]] for this situation, to be called {{t|uw-lead wrangler}}, at least until someone comes up with a better name. The point of having a template is to record the event on the user talk page when warranted. Ideally, by making the editor aware, they would change their ways and improve as an editor, and that would be the best outcome. But in the worst case, it would provide a record that might be of value later to an admin looking at the user's history. Thanks in advance for your thoughts and feedback. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 11:28, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
▲== Template-protected edit request on 1826 JuneAugust 2025 : uw-delete series ==
▲{{edit template-protected|Template:Uw- delete4imtest3|answered= yyes}}
Please change the <nowiki>[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] icon to [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] </nowiki>to match with the other uw-3 templates. [[User:Yerlo|Yerlo]] ([[User talk:Yerlo|talk]]) 22:38, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
:{{done}}. I checked four or five level 3 templates, and they all use the Nuvola image. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 02:33, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
== Template-protected edit request on 27 August 2025 ==
{{TPER|Tm:uw-biog3|Tm:uw-npa3|answered=y}}
These templates should also have their icons changed from File:Ambox warning pn.svg to File:Nuvola apps important.svg to match the base template ({{tlx|uw3}}) and the other uw-3 templates. [[User:Yerlo|Yerlo]] ([[User talk:Yerlo|talk]]) 21:47, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
▲: :::::::OK,{{done}}. IThanks seefor catching these. —– [[User: W.andreaJonesey95| W.andreaJonesey95]] ([[User talk: W.andreaJonesey95|talk]]) 1722: 3804, 2127 JuneAugust 2025 (UTC)
| 