Cailil

Revision as of 19:53, 29 May 2007

Latest revision as of 13:22, 13 March 2023

Line 1:

<div style="border: silver solid 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; text-align: center; width: 100%; background: #e5e5ef; color: #000000; font-weight: bold; padding: 5px 0px 5px 0px">ThisWelcome isto [[User:Cailil|Cailil's]] <span class="plainlinks">[[User talk:Cailil|talk page. ]]</span> To leave me a new message, please [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cailil&action=edit&section=new click here].</div>

{{User:Tothwolf/harassment-awareness|number=1}}

{{Twinkle topicon|number=2}}

{{Administrator|number=3}}

{{noindex}}

{{User:Cailil/header}}

<div style="float:right; padding-left:5px;">

<div style="border: silver solid 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; text-align: center; width: 100%; background: #e5e5ef; color: #000000; font-weight: bold; padding: 5px 0px 5px 0px">This is [[User:Cailil|Cailil's]] talk page. To leave me a new message, please [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cailil&action=edit&section=new click here].</div>

{| style="text-align:center; background-color:#e5e5ef; width: 350px; padding:10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:3em; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:3em; font-family: Arial"

{{archivebox|image=[[Image:Crystal Clear app file-manager.png|35px]]|box-width=13em|

|-

#[[User_talk:Cailil/archive1|Archive 1]]<br />

| {{User:Cailil/archives}}

#[[User_talk:Cailil/archive2|Archive 2]]<br />

|- padding-top:0.5em;font-size: 99%;

}}

| <div class="center">

__TOC__

</div>

}|}

</div>

<div style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 130%">This user is currently not active on Wikipedia, as of 21:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC).</div>[[Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery]]

==Farewell, and hope to see you back==

==Anacapa: Maoist mob rule or respectable-reasons rule on Wiki?==

Came around to ask if you might not mind popping on AE for a bit, but seems you're busy now. I'd be very happy to see you around again at some point. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small>^{[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]}</small> 03:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

== Your signature ==

I am responding to your comments on my talk page. What I have to say to you here might be hard for you to hear because I see from your discussions above that you SEEM to favor gender-ginning project pages, you SEEM to be "anti-conservative" (whatever that POV means to you personally) and you SEEM to be blind to the insane bullcrap and inane cowcrap (conservative, liberal or whatever) that prevails in the NAME of NPOV on Wikipedia. However, I am independent editor with a hard science background who has no problem separating people from their PERSONAL POV's so please refrain from taking what I say to you PERSONALLY. Instead, I ask that you consider the professional editing issues I raise here. I have real concerns about the rape of reason that reigns here on Wikipedia in the name of so-called consensus. I suggest you google Esquire magazine's NOV 05 ''Greetings from Idiot America'' for a better take than I can offer you on really happens on Wiki as well as on other online forums where mob rule is welcome. As with any topic it is always instructive to see what the other side (such as[http://www.aetherometry.com/antiwikipedia2/awp2_index.html]) has to say. This 'anti-wiki' take matches my take on many 'loaded' wiki articles where partisan propagandists rule.

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <code><nowiki><font></nowiki></code> tags, which are causing [[Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag|Obsolete HTML tags]] lint errors.

In particular, I am concerned about the rampant use of Maoist mob methods on Wiki, the (all-to-visible) ease with which totalitarian gangs get away with slander, character assassination and censorship on religious, on psuedo-religious (say the psuedo-science of inane politically- deterministic Gender Studies or the idiotic psuedo-religious side of the biologically-deterministic Evolutionary Psychology) and on other politically correct articles and the apparent lack of concern from editors like you about these totalitarian tactics. To toss away credible content, to call other editors pejorative names, and to use false forms of consensus to censor so-called "problematic" content is totalitarian by it's very nature. This kind of conduct destroys the credibility, the NPOV balance, and the completeness of all associated articles. (One can easily see the distorted pandering to gender-ginning propaganda in ANY gender-related article or project...one of your topics of interest, one of many topics (pro and con) where politically inspired psuedo-science rules, and a topic where widespread totalitarian tactics by it's proponents have been well documented by credible critics.) This widespread mob mayhem is so sad because Wiki is indeed a powerful platform within which to create credible content.

You are encouraged to change

Before I discuss specifics with you and before I help you in any way, I need to know that you care about, did do something about and are willing to do something about these serious editorial process issues. I need you to show me how you face totalitarian tactics (preferably on your favorite topics where someone offers opposing but well-sourced and credible content), how you insist on reasonable and respectable discussions IRREGARDLESS of your personal POV's about politics, 'gender', or whatever, and where you are willing to back other opposing but credible editors against mean-spirited barrages from totalitarian gangs. I will be glad to assist any editor who cares about well-established Western standards of free speech and reason-able dialogue. Do you care more about these standards than you do about your personal, political or other POV's or are you an editor who uses (inane) ends to justify (ugly) means?

: <code><nowiki>--[[User:Cailil|<font color="#808080">'''Cailil'''</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:Cailil|<font color="#808080">''talk''</font>]]}</nowiki></code> : --[[User:Cailil|<span style="color: #808080;">'''Cailil'''</span>]] ^{[[User_talk:Cailil|<span style="color: #808080;">''talk''</span>]]}

No offense, but I need to know who I am dealing with here before I begin to "help" you do whatever it is you need my help to do. I will be glad to discuss discussion 'methods' issues in more depth with you should you care to. That might be one way we could come to some common ground given that we seem to have a few differences in how we see particular topics...and especially those topics within which well-documented totalitarian thugs predominate.

to

I welcome your reasonable and respectable responses back. I ask that you point me to any administrators you know on wiki who are familiar with totalitarian tactics. I will be glad to listen to any constructive criticisms of any edits I have made that could be construed as un-reason-able, as personally pejorative or as unsourced. However, I will not allow any other editors to mob me just because I bring content in that is 'uncomfortable, 'problematic' or politically incorrect. I have a right to take on any IDEAS that I like boldly and with credible sources. I insist that I be allowed to engage in reasonable discussions rather than mere Maoist mob repressions. I also insist on a single civil standard for all editors so please use the same standards for me than you use for yourself and for other editors. Please show me what nice (no nice-vice) responses look like on Wiki. Thanks,[[User:Anacapa|Anacapa]] 03:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

: <code><nowiki>--[[User:Cailil|<span style="color: #808080;">'''Cailil'''</span>]] ^{[[User_talk:Cailil|<span style="color: #808080;">''talk''</span>]]}</nowiki></code> : --[[User:Cailil|<span style="color: #808080;">'''Cailil'''</span>]] ^{[[User_talk:Cailil|<span style="color: #808080;">''talk''</span>]]}

Respectfully, [[User:Anomalocaris|Anomalocaris]] ([[User talk:Anomalocaris|talk]]) 20:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

== wasn't vandalsim ==

== A barnstar for you! ==

what I just did wasn't vandalism, thanks anyway <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:L.P, Cheshunt|L.P, Cheshunt]] ([[User talk:L.P, Cheshunt|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/L.P, Cheshunt|contribs]]) 23:53, 12 May 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"

:Removing correct warnings that you got minutes ago from your talk page isn't a good idea. By the book it's not vandalism, I wont disagree, but it doesn't look good. Apologies for any inconveince caused--[[User:Cailil|<font color="grey" size="2">'''Cailil'''</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:Cailil|<font color="grey">'''talk'''</font>]]} 00:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Original Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]

|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''

|-

|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hope you are doing well. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 02:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

|}

:Thanks for the barnstar and the good wishes. I'm doing fine - only reason I'm not here is because IRL my job gives me zero free time----[[User:Cailil|<span style="color: #808080;">'''Cailil'''</span>]] ^{[[User_talk:Cailil|<span style="color: #808080;">''talk''</span>]]} 20:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

==[[Qian Zhijun]]==

You commented on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qian Zhijun]]. It has been closed early after a confusing and IMO unfortunate sequence of events. I have now listed it on [[WP:DRV|Deletion Review]]. You may wish to express your views there. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|^(talk)]] 01:02, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

==MfD nomination of [[:Portal:Men's rights movement]]==

== Induced dyslexia ==

[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|30px]] [[:Portal:Men's rights movement]], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Men's rights movement]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[:Portal:Men's rights movement]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 22:25, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

I am glad I checked the posting for Induced dyslexia so that I discovered before May 20th that you had deleted it.

I am new to contributing to Wikipedia so that I am not sure of the procedures to make sure that there is proper validation and verification of posted items.

The basis for my posting was a personal discovery as to why I was having a horrendous difficulty understanding text material for about a 5 year period. When I got new progressive glasses with a "corrected prescription" after 4 years, I also got reading glasses to wear while at work and while using my computer. About 6 months ago thanks in part to the "Cambridge spelling sample" I discovered that the loss of comprehension problem was from the effect if the reduced peripheral vision inherent in progressive glasses.

See http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/~mattd/Cmabrigde for the original article and additional references.

I am currently working with the Chairman of the Ophthalmology Department of Emory University to see if they can provide additional documentation and cases of this vision problem. He is very aware of the reduction of peripheral vision that is inherent in progressive glasses. In most cases, however, the wearer realizes the debilitation of progressive glasses and gets either bi-focals (which I now have) or tri-focals without bothering to analyze or understand the mechanics of the problem. I seem to be unique in thinking that the vision problem I was having was internal or emotional rather than because I was wearing the wrong glasses. It seems that I failed to understand the difference between being able to see the "Big E" and comprehending what I was reading. I also failed to understand the optician’s priorities for satisfying most patients was that they "look good" rather than their being able to "see well."

If you will let me figure out how to add proper additional documentation, I would greatly appreciate having the article re-posted.

Thank you,[[User:Hold2file|Hold2file]] 15:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

::Thanks for your comments I've responded on your talk page--[[User:Cailil|<font color="grey" size="2">'''Cailil'''</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:Cailil|<font color="grey">'''talk'''</font>]]} 16:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

=== being a newby ===

In trying to find out how to get my "Induced dyslexia" page reposted, I feel like the kid who walked into the wrong door and into the inner chambers of the High Priests.

I am indebted to Wikipedia for the almost infinite amount of information available. It has become the equivalent of Douglas Adams' 1980 "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy."

Hopefully, you will re-post my article on "Induced dyslexia" so that I can provide (and learn how to provide) the additional documentation. However, in trying to learn how to contact the administrators, I am in awe of the resiliency and depth of the information in and on Wikipedia that far exceeds my imagination or lifetime to investigate.

Is there a support group for Wikipedia Addicts or do they just become Editors?

You could call it "Non-Sequiturs Anonymous."

Allan Hytowitz[[User:Hold2file|Hold2file]] 15:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

::Responed on your talk page--[[User:Cailil|<font color="grey" size="2">'''Cailil'''</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:Cailil|<font color="grey">'''talk'''</font>]]} 16:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

== Where to dialogue ==

I don't like breaking conversations up all over the place. Do you want to here (and I'll monitor) or my page or anacapa page's talk page or..? [[User:jbolden1517|jbolden1517]]^{<font color="DarkGreen">[[User talk:jbolden1517|Talk]]</font>} 21:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)