Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
BOT- bypassing cross-namespace redirect using AWB |
||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 40:
And what's this: I come back to contribution and it's totally different. 3 losers and a juvenile conspiring and ganging up on me, making threats left and right. did you notice though, that's about all they do. that's ok. too bad i have others thing i need to do, it would have been a good fight, so to speak.
* If we were threatening you, [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Emico|we are now acting on it]]. You call us losers, but who's the one pointing false accusations of being part of organizations which nobody even knew or cared about before you brought it up? Who's the one [[baiting]] and attacking other [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|wikipedian]]s? Who's the one not caring for Wikipedia's rules and writing whatever they feel is right for them or someone not associated with Wikipedia? I can go on and on. It's not all about the Bereans and the INC, Emico. --[[User:Lbmixpro|LBMixPro]][[User talk:Lbmixpro|<sup><span style="text-decoration: none;">(Speak on it!)</span></sup>]] 21:42, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
** do whatever you want to, you're the elected judge and jury. and tell the juvenile to stop posting nonsense [[User:Emico|Emico]] 22:54, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
Line 46:
***If you have a point, then there's no need for hypocritical insults to get it across. I challenge you, if you're so confident about your "contributions," to defend your edits, statements and user conduct [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Emico|here]]. --[[User:Onlytofind|Onlytofind]] 23:51, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
I know what they don't like about my contribution
''"Among doctrines practiced by protestants is the catholic doctrine of a [[Triune]] God or the [[Trinity]]. This [[Trinity]] doctrine was affirmed as an article of faith by the [[Roman Catholics]] only after the issuance of the [[Nicene Creed]] in AD ([[325]]). Before that, there was no concept of the Trinity. Indeed, the bible, accepted as the authority for divine teachings, and attested to by bible scholars, never mentioned this word or the idea of a [[Triune]] God or [[Trinity]]. The early christians worship only one true God, the Father in heaven."''
''"The Nicene creed was introduced at the '''First Council of Nicaea''', during the reign of the [[Roman Emperors|Emperor]] [[Constantine I of the Roman Empire|Constantine]].
This is backed up by the sources I provided. Like what I said above on 06:29, 29 May 2005, they're in a bit of a quandary. The basis for their faith crumbles because of the above statements, and they justs don't like it. They remove this fact and and notice how they sneek in "Sola Scritura".
Oh, well. I do have to attend to my personal stuff. So, in the meantime I copied my original article to http://thebereansnet.blogspot.com. [[User:Emico|Emico]] 17:53, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
Line 79:
* '''I whole heartedly apologize if my reversion was made recklessly''', but your continuous destructive-critisism of other Wikipedians and myself are the cause of my involvement to this day. For the last time: Onlytofind did not provoke me, ''your bragging about the Bereans article at the INC article did.'' Let me repeat that: ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iglesia_ni_Cristo&diff=14389386&oldid=14358534 your bragging about the Bereans article at the INC article did.]'' Read you edit summary; ''"Wonder why this guy is suddenly nice? Could it be my Berean article?"'' I came to the Bereans article to figure out what you were talking about. Although I'm now more watchful of Onlytofind's attacks (thanks to you), your attacks don't seem to stop. They need to stop, because it's not fun anymore. If you want to, I'm willing to put all the issues we have behind, and assist you in becoming a better contributer to this site. As I said, I'm not bent on ruining your Wikipedia experience, but I WILL NOT TOLERATE someone else ruining mine. If you do not agree, Appearently, Wikipedia's policy will not meet your standards. I highly recommend you begin using the Wiki based encyclopedia [http://www.wikinfo.org Wikinfo]. Its rules are much more lenient than here and it's POV basis is sympathetic, instead of neutral. --[[User:Lbmixpro|LBMixPro]][[User talk:Lbmixpro|<sup><span style="text-decoration: none;">(Speak on it!)</span></sup>]] 07:44, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
** I'm way ahead of you. look at the dates of my "continuos" destructive criticism. I did not come here with the intention of offending anybody. My actions were reactions to yours and others actions. All of this would not have happened if the people involved did not abuse wikipedia's freedon to edit, paid a little respect to '''fellow''' contributors and remained fair and unbiased. I really don't care about what you or anybody else can '''"TOLERATE"''', do what you want. I made the mistake of trusting and respecting some of you once, I'm don't intend to make that mistake again. So, go ahead with threats of banning, arbitrating and whatever, and reverting my edit, and I'll continue with what I do. Have a nice day --[[User:Emico|Emico]] 14:13, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
***From now on, I'll [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] about your posts. But you should note that all articles are subject to WP's guideines and policies. As far as I'm concerned, my primary reason for disupte is now resolved, since I expect no more trash talk (at least toward me). But that doesn't prevent anybody from taking further action against you for any other reason. Remember each action made is part of the [[WP:DR|Resolution process]], just as I said that the RfC. Arbitration is only another form of trying to get our issues settled. -- Just look at the WP entry for the term "[[Arbitration]]". The Arbitration committee may react in your favor, if your future edits to WP are in the best interests of ''WP''. Also there are other Wikipedia-like sites which you may find more productive and enjoyable. Wikipedia isn't the only "free encyclopedia". --[[User:Lbmixpro|LBMixPro]][[User talk:Lbmixpro|<sup><span style="text-decoration: none;">(Speak on it!)</span></sup>]] 21:30, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
****I'll take your word for it, and expect that from now on, you will do onto others as you would like others to do to you at the Wikipedia. Hopefully this will be a fresh start for all of us, but keep in mind, that we will hold you to the exact same standards that you are holding us to regarding respect, fairness and neutrality. Regards, --[[User:Onlytofind|Onlytofind]] 02:50, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The arrogance of these people! You don't tell me what to do. You won't tell me that face to face, so why do it here? I suggest you stop what you're doing and start fresh. --[[User:Emico|Emico]] 14:31, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== Hall of Shame ==
The juvenile for being sneaky. From now on he's gollum to me. Hey, gollum, even Satan quoted the scriptures. So don't think that'll make you a good person. What a loser. [[User:Emico|Emico]] 20:51, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I really don't know what's up with this guy. Is he for real? After what he posted, he thinks saying sorry and olive branch is enough? Go ahead, read his post. --[[User:Emico|Emico]] 14:20, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
*I'm sorry Emico, after all we can't be as tolerant, forgiving and as reasonable as you.--[[User:Onlytofind|Onlytofind]] 04:18, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The big cry baby is at it again. He's stalking me!! Every post I make, he's sure to be there. He's probably writing his complaint right now. I wonder how long he can manipulate this system and some contributors. He is quite manipulative. He spews out vile on one post, then quote bible verses on another in the same night. Sneaky. --[[User:Emico|Emico]] 14:03, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== It's come down to this. ==
Emico, your actions regarding editing, reverting and your treatment of other users are grounds to refer you to the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee, who might ban your username '''and''' IP address from editing Wikipedia temporarily or even permanently due to your wanton violations of Wikiquette. Before I and the other users take that step, I would like to extend you an olive branch, and appeal to your sense of reason and decency by asking you to stop personal attacks on others and to work constructively, and not belligerently with others to achieve neutrality in editing and adding information to the Wikipedia. If you choose to do so, I'm sure the others as well as myself are willing to put our conflicts in the past and work together for the sake of the Wikipedia. I'm not saying that I've been a perfect Wikipedian myself, and I believe that I've come a long way since my first edit to the INC article. You can do the same- the choice is yours. --[[User:Onlytofind|Onlytofind]] 03:37, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== Final chance. ==
I've already agreed to stop exchanging personal attacks with you, and lo and behold, you had to bold my comment on the Erano Manalo discussion page. You're not innocent yourself regarding insults, and what you're doing is called baiting- against Wikipedia rules. You were doing well after LBMixPro talked with you last time, until you let your anger get the best of you. I reverted the page, added my response, and will give you '''one more chance to abide by the rules, and no more''' before I take this to arbitration.--[[User:Onlytofind|Onlytofind]] 07:42, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== You have been reported to Wikipedia Arbitration. ==
You can leave your comment regarding this matter on the [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration]] page.--[[User:Onlytofind|Onlytofind]] 03:37, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Please make this your last post on my talk page. Thank you and have a nice day. --[[User:Emico|Emico]] 04:29, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
*That will be at my discretion. Whatever the outcome, it's quite clear that you need to read and abide by the Wikipedia rules. Keep in mind that I've stopped my insults while you've kept on with yours.--[[User:Onlytofind|Onlytofind]] 20:44, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== Random Thought ==
Note to self: ''Continue ignoring trolls''. --[[User:Emico|Emico]] 16:05, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The clique is now severely disabled. It's death will soon follow. --[[User:Emico|Emico]] 17:14, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
| |||