Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpotlightPHP (software): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:55, 4 August 2007

Latest revision as of 19:36, 30 May 2022

(10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. — [[User:TKD|TKD]]::'''[[User talk:TKD|Talk]]''' 05:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

===[[SpotlightPHP (software)]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}}

:{{la|SpotlightPHP (software)}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpotlightPHP (software)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 August 4#{{anchorencode:SpotlightPHP (software)}}|View log]])</noinclude>

Procedural nom. Expired prod but sufficient objections on the talk page means AfD. I abstain. [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] 00:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

:*'''Delete''' per original prod reason. The last "objection" made on the talk page came from an IP on December 20, 2006, so I won't rate that as "sufficient." —'''[[User:Kurykh|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#0000C0"; face="font-family:cursive;">Kurykh</fontspan>]]''' 00:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

:Interesting, I had not checked the dates. Still, I think AfD is preferable. [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] 01:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' nn. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 01:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' nn. -- [[User:KTC|KTC]] 03:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' notable. --[[User:PEAR|PEAR]] ([[User talk:PEAR/2|talk]]) 08:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' I was the person who left the original PROD tag. Thank you for your interest in these articles, which were all listed in [[List of Content Management Systems]]. I am not a self-proclaimed deletionist, if some of the articles related to this list I have PRODed or nominated on AfD, are in fact notable, I would be only to happy to keep them with the correct references. When people have expressed concerns over half a year ago and the notability issue was not addressed, it is time to wonder if the problem is not simply that the software is not notable enough for wikipedia. To anyone who is voting keep, please, please provide the correct sources. Even just one person providing proof of notability can outweigh 100 people electing "delete". [[User:Jackaranga|Jackaranga]] 14:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletions]]. </small> -- [[User:KTC|KTC]] 03:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. The CMS I wrote is more notable than this one. Yet somehow I'm resisting from creating a page about it... [[User:JulesH|JulesH]] 16:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>