Beatification and canonization process prior to 1983: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
, recategorising
m conciseness
 
(76 intermediate revisions by 54 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Topic in Roman Catholic canon law}}
The process of [[beatification]] and [[canonization]] has undergone various changes in the history of the [[Catholic]] Church. (For current practice, as well as a discussion of other churches, see the article on [[canonization]].) This article describes the process as it was in [[1914]], in particular before the major reworking of [[canon law]] in [[1983]].
{{canon law}}
The process of [[beatification]] and [[canonization]] has undergone various changesreforms in the history of the [[Roman Catholic]] Church]]. (For current practice, as well as a discussion of similar processes in other churches, see the article on [[canonization]].) This article describes the process as it was inbefore [[1914]],the inpromulgation particular beforeof the major''[[1983 reworkingCode of [[canonCanon lawLaw|Codex Iuris Canonici]]'' in(''Code of Canon Law'') of [[1983]].
 
The causes of martyrs[[martyr]]s were handledconsidered somewhat differentydifferently from those of confessors or virgins[[confessor]]s, sofor willsome bepoints of handledthe separatelyprocess.
 
Until after the Second Vatican Council, the conclusive acts of the [[Canon law of the Catholic Church|canon practice and procedure]] of canonization<ref name="Saint Claire of Assisi">{{cite web | url = https://www.franciscantradition.org/clare-of-assisi-early-documents/78-the-acts-of-the-process-of-canonization-1253 | title = Saint Clare of Assisi: The Pontifical Bulla "Gloriosus Deus", first Act of the Process of Canonization | language = lt, en | access-date = Aug 28, 2018 | url-status = live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180921074139/https://www.franciscantradition.org/clare-of-assisi-early-documents/78-the-acts-of-the-process-of-canonization-1253 |archive-date=2018-09-21 }}</ref> were<ref name="Catholic Encyclopedia" />
==The Beatification of Confessors==
# the [[Papal bull|Pontifical Bull]] of Canonization,<ref name="Mira circa nos">{{cite web | author1 = pope Gregorius IS | url = http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Greg09/g9mira.htm | title = Translation of the Bulla "Mira circa nos" | language = en | year = 1228 | website = papalencyclicals.net| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180828173411/https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=5431 | archive-date = August 28, 2018 | url-status = live}}</ref><ref name="saint Thomas of Canterbury">{{cite web | url = https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/indexablecontent/uuid:534ef22f-70e0-466d-83dc-2b7447ccce85 | title = Pope Alexander Bull of Canonization in honour of Thomas Beckett | date = 14 February 2015 | page = 1 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160114212829/https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/indexablecontent/uuid:534ef22f-70e0-466d-83dc-2b7447ccce85 | archive-date = January 14, 2016 | url-status = live}}</ref><ref name="Joan of Arc">{{cite web | url = https://www.jehannedarc.org/french.html | title = Official pronunciation of Pope Pius XI, before Solemn Canonization in the Vatican Basilica| language = fr | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180828174104/https://www.jehannedarc.org/french.html | archive-date = August 28, 2018 | url-status = live}}</ref>
# and the [[Pontifical High Mass#Differences from ordinary Solemn Mass|Pontifical High Mass]] of Canonization (Beatification) celebrated in the [[Vatican Basilica]], during which the Pope officially proclaimed the martyr or the confessor to be Saint for the whole Catholic Church.<ref name="Catholic Encyclopedia">{{cite web | url = http://home.newadvent.org/cathen/02364b.htm | title = Lemma "Beatification and Canonization", in the Catholic Encyclopedia | language = en | website = newadvent.org | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170921122600/http://home.newadvent.org/cathen/02364b.htm | archive-date = September 21, 2017 | url-status = live}}</ref><ref name="Joan of Arc" />
The saint may have a [[Consecration#Christianity|church consecrated]] with their name, or be prayed to as an [[intercession of saints|intercessor]] during a [[Votive Mass#Rulings|Votive Mass]].<ref name="Catholic Encyclopedia" />
 
==The Beatification of Confessors==
In order to secure beatification (the most important and difficult step in the process of canonization) the regular procedure is as follows:
 
===Of Confessors===
# Choosing of a vice-postulator by the postulator-general of the cause, to promote all the judicial inquiries necessary in places outside of Rome. Such inquiries are instituted by the local [[bishop|episcopal]] authority.
# The preparation of the inquiries (''processus'') all of which are carried on by the ordinary episcopal authority. They are of three kinds: (a) Informative inquiries regard the reputation for sanctity and miracles of the servants of God, not only in general, but also in particular instances; there may be several such inquiries if the witnesses to be examined belong to different dioceses. (b) Processes ''de non cultu'' are instituted to prove that the decrees of [[Pope Urban VIII]] regarding the prohibition of public worship of servants of God before their beatification have been obeyed; they are generally conducted by the bishop of the place where the relics of the servant of God are preserved. (c) Other inquiries are known as ''Processiculi diligentiarum'' and have for their object the writings attributed to the person whose beatification is in question; they vary in number according to the dioceses where such writings are found, or are thought likely to be found, and may not be judicially executed before an "Instruction" is obtained from the promotor of the Faith by the postulator-general and by him sent to the [[bishop]] in question.
# The results of all these inquiries are sent to [[Rome]], to the Congregation of Rites, in charge of a messenger (''portitor'') chosen by the judges, or by some other secure way, in case a rescript of the congregation dispenses from the obligation of sending a messenger.
# They are opened, translated if necessary into [[Italian (language)|Italian]], a public copy is made, and a [[cardinal (Catholicism)|cardinal]] is deputed by the [[pope]] as relator or ''ponens'' of the cause, for all which steps rescripts of the congregation, confirmed by the pope, must be obtained.
# The writings of the servant of God are next revised by theologians appointed by the cardinal relator himself, authorized to so act by a special rescript. Meanwhile, the advocate and the procurator of the cause, chosen by the postulator-general, have prepared all the documents that concern the introduction of the cause (''positio super introductione causae''). These consist of (a) a summary of the informative processes, (b) an information, (c) answers to the observations or difficulties of the promotor of the Faith sent by him to the Postulator.
#This collection of documents (''positio'') is printed and distributed to the cardinals of the Congregation of Rites forty days before the date assigned for their discussion.
#If nothing contrary to faith and morals is found in the writings of the servant of God, a decree is published, authorizing further action (''quod in causâ procedi possit ad ulteriora''), i. e., the discussion of the matter (''dubium'') of appointment or non-appointment of a commission for the introduction of the cause.
# At the time fixed by the Congregation of Rites an ordinary meeting (''congregatio'') is held in which this appointment is debated by the cardinals of the aforesaid congregation and its officials, but without the vote or participation of the consultors, though this privilege is always granted them by prescript.
# If in this meeting the cardinals favour the appointment of the aforesaid commission, a decree to that effect is promulgated, and the pope signs it, but, according to custom, with his baptismal name, not with that of his pontificate. Thenceforward the servant of God is judicially given the title of Venerable.
# A petition is then presented asking remissorial letters for the bishops ''in partibus'' (outside of Rome), authorizing them to set on foot by Apostolic authority, the inquiry (''processus'') with regard to the fame of sanctity and miracles in general. This permission is granted by rescript, and such remissorial letters are prepared and sent to the bishops by the postulator-general. In case the eye-witnesses be of advanced age, other remissorial letters are usually granted for the purpose of opening a process known as "inchoative" concerning the particular virtues of miracles of the person in question. This is done in order that the proofs may not be lost (''ne pereant probationes''), and such inchoative process precedes that upon the miracles and virtues in general.
# While the Apostolic process concerning the reputation of sanctity is under way outside of Rome, documents are being prepared by the procurator of the cause for the discussion ''de non cultu'', or absence of ''cultus'', and at the appointed time an ordinary meeting (''congregatio'') is held in which the matter is investigated; if it be found that the decree of Urban VIII has been complied with, another decree provides that further steps may be taken.
# When the inquiry concerning the reputation of sanctity (super famâ) has arrived in Rome, it is opened (as already described in speaking of the ordinary processes, and with the same formalities in regard to rescripts), then translated into Italian, summarized, and declared valid. The documents super famâ in general are prepared by the advocate, and at the proper time, in an ordinary meeting of the cardinals of the Congregation of Rites, the question is discussed: whether there is evidence of a general repute for sanctity and miracles of this servant of God. If the answer is favourable, a decree embodying this result is published.
# New remissorial letters are then sent to the bishops in partibus for Apostolical processes with regard to the reputation for sanctity and miracles in particular. These processes must be finished within eighteen months and when they are received in Rome are opened, as above described, and by virtue of an equal number of rescripts, by the cardinal prefect, translated into Italian, and their summary authenticated by the Chancellor of the Congregation of Rites.
# The advocate of the cause next prepares the documents (''positio'') which have reference to the discussion of the validity of all the preceding processes, informative and Apostolic.
# This discussion is held in the meeting called congregatio rotalis from the fact that it is only judges of the [[Roman Rota]] who vote. If the difficulties of the promotor of the Faith are satisfactorily answered, the decree establishing the validity of the inquiries or processes is published.
# Meanwhile all necessary preparation is made for the discussion of the question (''dubium''): Is there evidence that the venerable servant of God practiced virtues both theological and cardinal, and in an heroic degree? (''An constet de virtutibus Ven. servi Dei, tam theologicis quam cardinalibus, in heroico gradu?'') In the causes of confessors this step is of primary importance. The point is discussed in three meetings or congregations called respectively, ante-preparatory, preparatory, and general. The first of these meetings is held in the palace of the cardinal relator (reporter) of the cause, and in it only consultors of the Congregation of Sacred Rites, and with their chairman, or prefect, presiding, the third is also held in the Vatican, and at it the pope presides, and both cardinals and consultors vote. For each of these congregations the advocate of the cause prepares and prints official reports (''positiones''), called respectively report, new report, final report, concerning the virtues, etc., -- ''positio'', ''positio nova'', ''positio novissima'', ''super virtutibus''. In each case, before proceeding to the subsequent meeting, a majority of the consultors must decide that the difficulties of the promotor of the Faith have been satisfactorily solved.
# When the Congregation of Rites in the above described general meeting has decided favourably, the pope is asked is asked to sign the solemn decree which asserts that there exists evidence of the heroic virtues of the servant of God. This decree is not published until after the pope, having commended the matter to God in prayer, gives a final consent and confirms by his supreme sentence the decision of the congregation.
# The miracles now remain to be proved, of which two of the first class are required in case the practice of virtues in the heroic degree has been proved, in both ordinary and Apostolic inquiries or processes by eyewitnesses -- three, if the eyewitnesses were found only in the ordinary processes; four, if the virtues were proven only by hearsay (''de auditu'') witnesses. If the miracles have been sufficiently proven in the Apostolic processes (''super virtutibus'') already declared valid, steps are taken at once to prepare the documents with regard to miracles (''super miraculis''). If in the Apostolic processes only general mention has been made of the miracles, new Apostolic processes must be opened, and conducted after the manner already described for proving the practice of virtues in an heroic degree.
# The discussion of the particular miracles proceeds in exactly the same way and in the same order as that of the virtues. If the decisions be favourable, the general meeting of the congregation is followed by a decree, confirmed by the pope, in which it is announced that there is proof of miracles. It must be noted here that in the positio for the ante-preparatory congregation there are required, and are printed, opinions of two physicians, one of whom has been chosen by the postulator, the other by the Congregation of Rites. Of the three reports (''positiones'') above mentioned, and which are now also required, the first is prepared in the usual way; the second consists of an exposition of the heroic virtues of the servant of God. an information, and a reply to later observations of the promotor of the Faith; the last consists only of an answer to his final observations.
# When the miracles have been proved, another meeting of the Congregation of Rites is held in which it is debated once, and only once, whether or not, given the approbation of the virtues and miracles, it is safe to proceed with the solemnities of beatification. If a majority of the consultors be favourable, a decree to this effect is issued by the pope, and at the time appointed by him the solemn beatification of the servant of God takes place in the Vatican [[St. Peter's Basilica|Basilica]], on which occasion a pontifical Brief is issued permitting the public cultus and veneration of the beatified person now known as Blessed (Beatus).
 
In order to secure beatification, (the most important and difficult step in the process of canonization), the regular procedure iswas as follows:<ref name=Catholic/>
==The Beatification of Martyrs==
 
# ChoosingSelection of a vice-postulator by the postulator-general of the cause, to promote all the judicial inquiries necessary in places outside of Rome. Such inquiries arewere instituted by the local [[bishop|episcopal]] authority.
# The causes of [[martyr]]s are conducted in the same way as those of confessors as far as the informative processes and those ''de non cultu'' and ''ad introductionem causae'' are concerned. But when once the commission of introduction has been appointed they advance much more rapidly.
# The preparation of the inquiries (''processus'') all of which arewere carried on by the ordinary episcopal authority. They arewere of three kinds: (a) Informative inquiries regardregarded the reputation for sanctity and miracles[[miracle]]s of the servants of God, not only in general, but also in particular instances; there maymight be several such inquiries if the witnesses to be examined belongbelonged to different dioceses[[diocese]]s. (b) Processes ''de non cultu'' arewere instituted to prove that the decrees of [[Pope Urban VIII]] regarding the prohibition of public worshipveneration of servants of God before their beatification havehad been obeyed; they arewere generally conducted by the bishop of the place where the relics[[relic]]s of the [[servant of God]] arewere preserved. (c) Other inquiries arewere known as "''Processiculiprocessiculi diligentiarum''" and havehad for their object the writings attributed to the person whose beatification iswas in question; they varyvaried in number according to the dioceses[[diocese]]s where such writings arewere found, or arewere thought likely to be found, and maymight not be judicially executed before an "Instructioninstruction" iswas obtained from the promotorPromotor of the Faith by the postulator-generalPostulator General and by him sent to the [[bishop]] in question.
# No remissorial letters are granted for Apostolic processes concerning the general reputation for martyrdom and miracles; the letters sent call for an immediate investigation into the fact of martyrdom, its motive, and the particular miracles alleged. There is no longer a discussion of the general reputation for martyrdom or miracles.
# The results of all these inquiries arewere sent to [[Rome]], to the [[Congregation of Rites]], in charge of a messenger (''portitor'') chosen by the judges, or by some other secure way, in case a rescript of the congregationCongregation dispensesdispensed from the obligation of sending a messenger.
# The miracles are not discussed, as formerly, in separate meetings, but in the same meetings that deal with the fact and the motive of the martyrdom.
# They arewere opened, translated if necessary into [[Italian (language)|Italian]], a public copy iswas made, and a [[cardinal (Catholicism)|cardinal]] iswas deputed by the [[popePope]] as relator or (''ponens'') of the cause, for all which steps rescripts of the congregationCongregation, confirmed by the pope[[Pope]], must be obtained.
# The miracles (''signa'') required are not those of the first class; those of the second class suffice, nor is their number determined. On some occasions the decision as to miracles has been entirely dispensed with.
# The writings of the servant of God arewere next revised by theologians appointed by the cardinal relatorRelator himself, authorized to so act by a special rescript. Meanwhile, the advocateAdvocate and the procuratorProcurator of the cause, chosen by the postulator-generalPostulator General, havehad prepared all the documents that concernconcerned the introduction of the cause (''positio super introductione causae''). These consistconsisted of (a) a summary of the informative processes, (b) an information, and (c) answers to the observations or difficulties of the promotorPromotor of the Faith sent by him to the Postulator.
# The discussion as to martyrdoms and miracles, formerly held in three meetings or congregations, viz. the ante-preparatory, preparatory, and general, is now usually conducted, through a dispensation to be had in each instance from the sovereign pontiff, in a single congregation known as particularis, or special. It consists of six or seven cardinals of the Congregation of Rites and four or five prelates especially deputed by the pope. There is but one positio prepared in the usual way; if there be an affirmative majority a decree is issued concerning the proof of martyrdom, the cause of martyrdom, and miracles. (''Constare de Martyrio'', ''causâ Martyrii et signis''.)
#This collection of documents (''positio'') iswas printed and distributed to the cardinals of the Congregation of Rites forty40 days before the date assigned for their discussion.
# The final stage is a discussion of the security (''super tuto'') with which advance to beatification may be made, as in the case of confessors; the solemn beatification then follows.
#If nothing contrary to faith and morals iswas found in the writings of the servant of God, a decree iswas published, authorizingthat authorized further action (''quod in causâcausa procedi possit ad ulteriora''), i. e., the discussion of the matter (''dubium'') of appointment or non-appointment of a commission for the introduction of the cause.
# At the time fixed by the Congregation of Rites an ordinary meeting (''congregatio'') iswas held in which this appointment iswas debated by the cardinals of the aforesaid congregationCongregation and its officials, but without the vote or participation of the consultorsConsultors, though this privilege iswas always granted them by prescript.
# If in this meeting the cardinals favourfavoured the appointment of the aforesaid commissionCommission, a decree to that effect iswas promulgated, and the pope[[Pope]] signssigned it, but, according to custom, with his baptismal name, not with that of his pontificate. Thenceforward the servant of God iswas judicially given the title of "[[Venerable]]".
# A petition iswas then presented asking remissorial letters for the bishops outside of Rome (''in partibus'' (outside of Rome), authorizing them to set on foot, by Apostolic authority, the inquiry (''processus'') with regard to the fame of sanctity and miracles in general. This permission iswas granted by rescript, and such remissorial letters arewere prepared and sent to the bishops by the postulator-generalPostulator General. In case the eye-witnesseseyewitnesses bewere of advanced age, other remissorial letters arewere usually granted for the purpose of opening a process known as "inchoative" concerning the particular virtues of miracles of the person in question. This iswas done in order that the proofs maymight not be lost (''ne pereant probationes''), and such inchoative process precedespreceded that upon the miracles and virtues in general.
# While the Apostolic process concerning the reputation of sanctity iswas under way outside of Rome, documents are beingwere prepared by the procuratorProcurator of the cause for the discussion ''de non cultu'', or absence of ''cultus'', and at the appointed time an ordinary meeting (''congregatio'') iswas held in which the matter iswas investigated; if it bewas found that the decree of [[Pope Urban VIII]] hashad been complied withobeyed, another decree providesprovided that further steps maymight be taken.
# When the inquiry concerning the reputation of sanctity (''super famâfama'') hashad arrived in Rome, it iswas opened (as already described in speaking of the ordinary processes, and with the same formalities in regard to rescripts), then translated into [[Italian language|Italian]], summarized, and declared valid. The documents ''super famâfama'' in general arewere prepared by the advocateAdvocate, and at the proper time, in an ordinary meeting of the cardinals of the Congregation of Rites, the question iswas discussed: whether there iswas evidence of a general repute for sanctity and miracles of this servant of God. If the answer iswas favourable, a decree embodying this result iswas published.
# New remissorial letters arewere then sent to the bishops ''in partibus'' for ApostolicalApostolic processes with regard to the reputation for sanctity and miracles in particular. These processes must be finished within eighteen18 months and when they arewere received in Rome arewere opened, as above described, and by virtue of an equal number of rescripts, by the cardinal prefectPrefect, translated into [[Italian language|Italian]], and their summary authenticated by the Chancellor of the Congregation of Rites.
# The advocateAdvocate of the cause next preparesprepared the documents (''positio'') which havehad reference to the discussion of the validity of all the preceding processes, informative and Apostolic.
# This discussion iswas held in the meeting called ''congregatio rotalis'' from the fact that it iswas only judges of the [[Roman Rota]] who votevoted. If the difficulties of the promotorPromotor of the Faith arewere satisfactorily answered, the decree establishing the validity of the inquiries or processes iswas published.
# Meanwhile, all necessary preparation iswas made for the discussion of the question (''dubium''): Is there evidence that the venerable servant of God practiced virtues both [[Theological virtues|theological]] and [[Cardinal virtues|cardinal]], and in an [[Heroic virtue|heroic]] degree? (''An constet de virtutibus Ven. servi Dei, tam theologicis quam cardinalibus, in heroico gradu?'') In the causes of confessors this step iswas of primary importance. The point iswas discussed in three meetings or congregations called respectively, ante-preparatory, preparatory, and general. The first of these meetings iswas held in the palace of the cardinal relator (reporter)Relator of the cause, and in it only consultors of the Congregation of Sacred Rites, and with their chairman, or prefect, presiding, the third iswas also held in the [[Vatican City]], and at it the pope[[Pope]] presidespresided, and both cardinals and consultors votevoted. For each of these congregations the advocateAdvocate of the cause preparesprepared and printsprinted official reports (''positiones''), called respectively "report", "new report", "final report", report "concerning the virtues", etc.,et --cetera (''positio'', ''positio nova'', ''positio novissima'', ''super virtutibus'', et cetera). In each case, before proceeding to the subsequent meeting, a majority of the consultorsConsultors must decide that the difficulties of the promotorPromotor of the Faith havehad been satisfactorily solved.
# When the Congregation of Rites in the above described general meeting hashad decided favourably, the pope[[Pope]] is asked iswas asked to sign the solemn decree which assertsasserted that there existsexisted evidence of the heroic virtues of the servant of God. This decree iswas not published until after the pope[[Pope]], having commended the matter to God in prayer, givesgave a final consent and confirmsconfirmed by his supreme sentence the decision of the congregationCongregation.
# The miracles now remainremained to be proved, of which two of the first class arewere required in case the practice of virtues in the heroic degree hashad been proved, in both ordinary and Apostolic inquiries or processes by eyewitnesses --: three, if the eyewitnesses were found only in the ordinary processes; and four, if the virtues were proven only by hearsay (''de auditu'') witnesses. If the miracles havehad been sufficiently proven in the Apostolic processes (''super virtutibus'') already declared valid, steps arewere taken at once to prepare the documents with regard to miracles (''super miraculis''). If in the Apostolic processes only general mention hashad been made of the miracles, new Apostolic processes must be opened, and conducted after the manner already described for proving the practice of virtues in an heroic degree.
# The discussion of the particular miracles proceedsproceeded in exactly the same way and in the same order as that of the virtues. If the decisions bewere favourable, the general meeting of the congregationCongregation iswas followed by a decree, confirmed by the pope[[Pope]], in which it iswas announced that there iswas proof of miracles. It must be noted here that inIn the ''positio'' for the ante-preparatory congregation there arewere required, and arewere printed, opinions of two physicians, one of whom hashad been chosen by the postulator,Postulator and the other by the Congregation of Rites. Of the three reports (''positiones'') above mentioned, and which arewere now also required, the first iswas prepared in the usual way; the second consistsconsisted of an exposition of the heroic virtues of the servant of God., an information, and a reply to later observations of the promotorPromotor of the Faith; the last consistsconsisted only of an answer to his final observations.
# When the miracles havehad been proved, another meeting of the Congregation of Rites iswas held in which it iswas debated once, and only once, whether or not, given the approbation of the virtues and miracles, it iswas safe to proceed with the solemnities of beatification. If a majority of the consultorsConsultors bewas favourable, the [[Pope]] issued a decree to this effect is issued by the pope, and at the time appointed by him the solemn beatification of the servant of God takes placeoccurred in the Vatican [[St. Peter's Basilica|Basilica]], on which occasion a pontifical[[Papal Briefbrief]] iswas issued permitting the public ''[[Cult (religious practice)|cultus]]'' and [[veneration]] of the beatified person, now known as "Blessed" ("''Beatus''").
 
===Of Martyrs===
==Confirmation of cult==
This procedure is followed in all cases of formal beatification in causes of both confessors and martyrs proposed in the ordinary way (''per viam non cultus''). Those proposed as coming under the definition of cases excepted (''casus excepti'') by Urban VIII are treated in another way. In such cases it must be proved that an immemorial public veneration (at least for 100 years before the promulgation, in [[1640]], of the decrees of Urban VIII) has been paid the servant of God, whether confessor or martyr. Such cause is proposed under the title of "confirmation of veneration" (''de confirmatione cultus''); it is dealt with in an ordinary meeting of the Congregation of Rites. When the difficulties of the promotor of the Faith have been satisfied, a pontifical decree confirming the cultus is promulgated. Beatification of this kind is called equivalent or virtual.
 
# The causes of [[martyr]]s arewere conducted in the same way as those of confessors as far as the informative processes and those ''de non cultu'' and ''ad introductionem causae'' arewere concerned. But when once the commission of introduction hashad been appointed they advance much more rapidly.
==The Canonization of Confessors or Martyrs==
# No remissorial letters arewere granted for Apostolic processes concerning the general reputation for martyrdom and miracles; the letters sent callcalled for an immediate investigation into the fact of martyrdom, its motive, and the particular miracles alleged. There iswas no longer a discussion of the general reputation for martyrdom or miracles.
# The miracles arewere not discussed, as formerly, in separate meetings, but in the same meetings that dealdealt with the fact and the motive of the martyrdom.
# The miracles (''signa'') required arewere not those of the first class; those of the second class sufficesufficed, nor iswas their number determined. On some occasions the decision as to miracles has beenwas entirely dispensed with.
# The discussion as to martyrdoms and miracles, formerly held in three meetings or congregations, viz. the ante-preparatory, preparatory, and general, iswas nowat a later time usually conducted, through a dispensation to be had in each instance from the sovereign pontiff, in a single congregation known as particularis, or special. It consistsconsisted of six or seven cardinals of the Congregation of Rites and four or five prelates especially deputed by the pope. There iswas but one positio prepared in the usual way; if there bewas an affirmative majority a decree iswas issued concerning the proof of martyrdom, the cause of martyrdom, and miracles. (''Constare de Martyrio'', ''causâ Martyrii et signis''.)
# The final stage iswas a discussion of the security (''super tuto'') with which advance to beatification maymight be made, as in the case of confessors; the solemn beatification then followsfollowed.<ref name=Catholic/>
 
===Confirmation of cultCult===
The canonization of confessors or martyrs may be taken up as soon as two miracles are reported to have been worked at their [[Intercession of saints|intercession]], after the pontifical permission of public veneration as described above. At this stage it is only required that the two miracles worked after the permission awarding a public cultus be discussed in three meetings of the congregation. The discussion proceeds in the ordinary way; if the miracles be confirmed another meeting (''super tuto'') is held. The pope then issues a [[Papal bull|Bull]] of Canonization in which he not only permits, but commands, the public cultus, or veneration, of the saint.
This procedure iswas followed in all cases of formal beatification in causes of both confessors and martyrs proposed in the ordinary way ("''per viam non cultus''"). Those proposed as coming under the definition of cases excepted ("''casus excepti''") by [[Pope Urban VIII]] arewere treated in another waydifferently. In such cases itproof must beis provedrequired that an immemorial public veneration (athad leastbeen forpaid 100to yearsthe beforeservant theof promulgationGod, inwhether [[1640]],as ofa theconfessor decreesor ofmartyr, Urbanfor VIII)at hasleast been100 paidyears before the servantpromulgation in 1640 of God,the whetherdecrees confessorof or[[Pope martyrUrban VIII]]. Such cause iswas proposed under the title of "confirmation of veneration" ("''de confirmatione cultus''"); it is dealtwas withconsidered in an ordinary meeting of the Congregation of Rites. When the difficulties of the promotorPromotor of the Faith havehad been satisfied, a pontificalPontifical decree confirming the ''cultus'' iswas promulgated. Beatification of this kind iswas calleddenominated "equivalent" or "virtual".<ref name=Catholic/>
 
==Canonization==
It may be easily conjectured that considerable time must elapse before any cause of beatification or canonization can be conducted, from the first steps of the information, inquiry, or process, to the issuing of the decree super tuto. According to the constitution of this Congregation, more than one important discussion (''dubia maiora'') cannot be proposed at the same time. It must be remembered
The canonization of confessors or martyrs maymight be taken up as soon as two miracles arewere reported to have been worked at their [[Intercession of saints|intercession]], after the pontifical permission of public veneration as described above. At this stage it iswas only required that the two miracles worked after the permission awarding a public cultus be discussed in three meetings of the congregation. The discussion proceedsproceeded in the ordinary way; if the miracles bewere confirmed, another meeting (''super tuto'') iswas held. The pope then issuesissued a [[Papal bull|Bull]] of Canonization in which he not only permitspermitted, but commandscommanded, the public cultus, or veneration, of the saint.<ref name=Catholic/>
 
It may be easily conjectured that considerable time must elapse before any cause of beatification or canonization cancould be conducted, from the first steps of the information, inquiry, or process, to the issuing of the decree super tuto. According to the constitution of this Congregation, more than one important discussion (''dubia maiora'') cannotcould not be proposed at the same time. It must be remembered:<ref name=Catholic/>
 
* that the same cardinals and consultors must vote in all discussions;
* that there iswas but one promotor of the Faith and one sub-promotor, who alone havehad charge of all observations to be made with regard to the ''dubia''; and
* that these cardinals and consultors havehad to treat questions of ritual as well as processes of canonization and beatification.
 
To execute all this business there iswas but one weekly meeting (''congressus''), a kind of minor congregation in which only the cardinal prefect and the major officials votevoted; in it less important and practical questions arewere settled regarding rites as well as causes, and answers arewere given, and rescripts which the pope[[Pope]] afterwards verbally approvesapproved. The other meetings of the congregation (ordinary, rotal, and "upon virtues and miracles") maymight be as few as sixteen in the course of the year. Some other cause must therefore be found for the slow progress of causes of beatification or canonization than a lack of good will or activity on the part of the Congregation of Rites.<ref name=Catholic>{{Catholic|wstitle=Beatification and Canonization|inline=1}}</ref>
 
==Bibliography==
* [[André Vauchez]], ''La sainteté en Occident aux derniers siècles du Moyen Âge (1198-1431)'' [http://www.publications.ecole-francaise.it/cgi-bin/ecole-francaise/details.cgi?address=&request=1%253d1003%25204%253d2%2520%2520%2522vauchez%2522&visrequest=%253cspan%2520class%253dvisrequestuse%253eAuteur%253c%252fspan%253e%253d%2520%2522%253cspan%2520class%253dvisrequestval%253evauchez%253c%252fspan%253e%2522&listrequest=&database=&item=17&format=&previous=&sort=1003+4+31&template=&stateless= [1&#93;], Rome, 1981 (''BEFAR'', 241) [Eng. Transl.''Sainthood in the Later Middle Ages'', Cambridge, 1987 and Ital. transl. : ''La santità nel Medioevo'', Bologne, 1989].
 
==References==
To execute all this business there is but one weekly meeting (''congressus''), a kind of minor congregation in which only the cardinal prefect and the major officials vote; in it less important and practical questions are settled regarding rites as well as causes, and answers are given, and rescripts which the pope afterwards verbally approves. The other meetings of the congregation (ordinary, rotal, and "upon virtues and miracles") may be as few as sixteen in the course of the year. Some other cause must therefore be found for the slow progress of causes of beatification or canonization than a lack of good will or activity on the part of the Congregation of Rites.
{{Reflist}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Historical Process Of Beatification And Canonization}}
{{Catholic}}
[[Category:Roman20th-century Catholic Church historyCatholicism]]
[[Category:Beatified people]]
[[Category:Beatifications|Beatif]]
[[Category:1914 in Christianity]]
[[Category:Canon law history]]
[[Category:Catholic theology and doctrine]]
[[Category:Canonization]]