Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Failure of imagination: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:27, 17 July 2005

Latest revision as of 17:19, 30 March 2022

(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

<!--

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the VfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''KEEP:8k, 2r, 1d'''. Anon IP vote discounted. -[[User:Splash|Splash]] 00:43, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

===[[Failure of imagination]]===

Obvious phrase. Sure it was used in the 9/11 report but in the same way that "brake failure" is used to describe the failure of brakes.--[[User:LeeHunter|Lee Hunter]] 16:29, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Line 15 ⟶ 21:

*'''Redirect''' to [[Argument from ignorance]]. - [[User:Ar|Ar]] 14:01, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

*'''Keep'''. I agree with [[User:Titoxd|Titoxd]]'s statement. -- [[User:Judson|Judson]] 23:27, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

*'''Edit'''. Term clearly has come in common usage - article however ehidibits a strong bias outside the scope of discussing the issue of "failure of imagination".

*'''Keep'''. Little to add. --[[User:Kizor|Kizor]] 17:15, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an [[Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion|undeletion request]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>