Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo/Archive 13) (bot |
|||
Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{controversial}}
{{Article history
|currentstatus=DGA
|action1=GAN
|action1date=2006-08-11
|action1result=listed
|action1oldid=68473367
|topic=Philrelig
|action2=GAR
|action2date=2007-10-15
|action2result=delisted
|action2oldid=165167284
| action3 = GAN
| action3date = 2014-08-20
| action3result = failed
| action3oldid = 621858888
|otd1date=2014-07-27|otd1oldid=618506586
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject Christianity|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Tambayan Philippines|importance=High}}
}}
{{archives
| auto = yes
| search = yes
| root =
| prefix =
| bot = MiszaBot
| age = 90
| units = days
|
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(90d)
| archive=Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo/Archive %(counter)d
| counter=13
| maxarchivesize=400K
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadsleft=4
| minthreadstoarchive=1
}}
== Semi-protected edit request on 23 September 2024 ==
{{edit semi-protected|Iglesia ni Cristo|answered=yes}}
Please update the reference for the following source:
"5. Adriel Obar Meimban (1994). 'A Historical Analysis of the Iglesia ni Cristo: ''Cult'' in the Far East, Philippine Islands' (PDF)."
The original title of the book, as verified through the Wayback Machine, is:
"A Historical Analysis of the Iglesia ni Cristo: ''Christianity'' in the Far East, Philippine Islands."
Here is the archived link for reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20110826002343/http://repository.cc.sophia.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/123456789/5124/1/200000079942_000012000_95.pdf
I propose correcting the reference to reflect the accurate title. [[User:Tagaluto|Tagaluto]] ([[User talk:Tagaluto|talk]]) 00:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
:Fixed citation. Regards. [[User:Sanglahi86|Sanglahi86]] ([[User talk:Sanglahi86|talk]]) 03:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
[[File:Pictogram voting wait.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Already done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:PianoDan|PianoDan]] ([[User talk:PianoDan|talk]]) 05:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
== Death of Gold Dagal ==
This should be added under controversies.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Dagal 08:16, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
== Semi-protected edit request on 16 July 2025 ==
{{Edit semi-protected|Iglesia ni Cristo|answered=yes}}
Hello! I would just like to make one incorrect mistake in this article. The mistake that I would request to fix is the part where is reads "founded by Felix Manalo", just to let you know; this Church believes that Jesus Christ founded the Church, and was RESTORED by Felix Manalo.
Another thing I would like to edit is that the name is not "Iglesia ni Cristo", its "Iglesia Ni Cristo" (uppercase N in the 'ni'), and Church of Christ, to Church Of Christ.
EDIT 1: '''Change the part where it says "FOUNDED BY FELIX MANALO" to "FOUNDED BY JESUS CHRIST AND RESTORED BY FELIX MANALO'''
EDIT 2: '''Change the title of the article and any other mentions where it says "Iglesia ni Cristo / Church of Christ" to "Iglesia Ni Cristo / Church Of Christ'''
Thank you! [[User:In4m4w(353)|In4m4w(353)]] ([[User talk:In4m4w(353)|talk]]) 01:35, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
:{{Not done}}: please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> <span style="background:#39FF14;padding:4px;border-radius:.3em;">[[User:Dahawk04|<b style="color:#fff">Dahawk04</b>]]</span> <span style="background:#1F51FF;padding:4px;border-radius:.3em;">[[User talk:Dahawk04|<b style="color:#fff">Talk 💬</b>]]</span> 02:24, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
::'''Comment''' also this change is from an INC-POV, virtually most Christian churches considers Jesus Christ as its founder but consensus (including secular sources) states Felix Manalo is the founder of the INC. Capitalization of prepositions "of" and "ni" is also non-standard. If In4m4w(353) posts a verifiable source that it is the legal name/trademark of the church to capitalize the preposition. Then it can be noted in the lead or somewhere ''once''. [[User:Hariboneagle927|Hariboneagle927]] ([[User talk:Hariboneagle927|talk]]) 09:40, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
== Sources for the Controversy section ==
I’ve noticed that nearly all of the material in the Controversy section is drawn from [[Rappler]] (particularly pieces by Katerina Francisco). While Rappler is a news website, Wikipedia’s sourcing guidelines [[WP:RS]] ask for multiple, independent, high-quality sources when covering potentially contentious or critical claims. Rappler itself has been the subject of reliability discussions (see [[Rappler]]), and reliance on a single outlet can give undue weight [[WP:UNDUE]] or risk [[NPOV]] issues.
Questions for the group:
Can anyone point to additional reliable coverage of these controversies?
If no other sources are available, should we consider trimming or summarizing this section more neutrally until further references surface?
Should we add {{more citations}} or {{undue}} tags to the section?
I’m not advocating deletion of well-sourced material, but I’d like to be sure we’re meeting WP:VERIFY and WP:WEIGHT. Thoughts? — —[[User:Drakegone|Drakegone]] ([[User talk:Drakegone|talk]]) 19:45, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
:Absolutely not. The assertion that ''Rappler'' is unreliable hinges on claims of the Duterte government—itself certainly far from a reliable source. If you could point out an instance where a consensus of Wikipedia editors questioned the reliability of ''Rappler'', that would be different. Best, ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 20:04, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
| |||