Wikipedia

Search engine optimization: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m better link
Reverted 2 edits by Derosse (talk): Rv AI slop
 
Line 1:
{{Short description|Practice of increasing online visibility}}
'''Search engine optimization''' ('''SEO''') is a set of [[methodology|methodologies]] aimed at improving the ranking of a [[website]] in [[search engine]] listings. The term also refers to an industry of [[consultant]]s that carry out optimization projects on behalf of client sites.
{{Redirect|SEO|other uses|Seo (disambiguation)}}
{{Multiple Issues|
{{Update|date=December 2024}}
{{Essay-like|date=January 2025}}
}}
{{pp|small=yes}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2012}}
{{Internet Marketing}}
 
'''Search engine optimization''' ('''SEO''') is the process of improving the quality and quantity of [[Web traffic|website traffic]] to a [[website]] or a [[web page]] from [[web search engine|search engine]]s.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.webopedia.com/TERM/S/SEO.html|title=SEO – search engine optimization|website=Webopedia|date=December 19, 2001|access-date=May 9, 2019|archive-date=May 9, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190509033028/https://www.webopedia.com/TERM/S/SEO.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Giomelakis |first1=Dimitrios |last2=Veglis |first2=Andreas |date=2016-04-02 |title=Investigating Search Engine Optimization Factors in Media Websites: The case of Greece |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21670811.2015.1046992 |journal=Digital Journalism |language=en |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=379–400 |doi=10.1080/21670811.2015.1046992 |s2cid=166902013 |issn=2167-0811 |access-date=October 30, 2022 |archive-date=October 30, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221030054324/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21670811.2015.1046992 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription }}</ref> SEO targets unpaid search traffic (usually referred to as "[[Organic search|organic]]" results) rather than direct traffic, referral traffic, [[social media]] traffic, or [[Online advertising|paid traffic]].
To obtain maximum search engine visibility, a website must tailor itself to be found by its [[target audience]] through [[internet search]]es. If a site is to be found, it must contain [[keyword]] phrases that match the phrases the target audience is typing into [[search query|search queries]]. These keywords are determined by [[search engine spider]]s that analyze web page content and keyword relevancy based on an [[algorithm]]. Search engine optimization is the process of configuring a website to be more visible to its target audience.
 
Organic search engine traffic originates from a variety of kinds of searches, including [[image search]], [[video search]], [[academic databases and search engines|academic search]],<ref name="aseo">{{cite web|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728010319/https://www.sciplore.org/publications/2010-ASEO--preprint.pdf|title=Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO): Optimizing Scholarly Literature for Google Scholar and Co.|last1=Beel|first1=Jöran|last2=Gipp|first2=Bela|last3=Wilde|first3=Erik|year=2010|publisher=Journal of Scholarly Publishing|pages=176–190|access-date=April 18, 2010|archive-date=November 18, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171118043054/https://www.sciplore.org/publications/2010-ASEO--preprint.pdf}}</ref> news search, industry-specific [[vertical search]] engines, and large language models.
==History==
 
As an [[Internet marketing]] strategy, SEO considers how search engines work, the [[algorithm]]s that dictate search engine results, what people search for, the actual search queries or [[Keyword research|keywords]] typed into search engines, and which search engines are preferred by a target audience. SEO helps websites attract more visitors from a search engine and rank higher within a [[search engine results page]] (SERP), aiming to either convert the visitors or build brand awareness.<ref>Ortiz-Cordova, A. and Jansen, B. J. (2012) [https://faculty.ist.psu.edu/jjansen/academic/jansen_high_revenue_customers_2012.pdf Classifying Web Search Queries in Order to Identify High Revenue Generating Customers]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304203905/https://faculty.ist.psu.edu/jjansen/academic/jansen_high_revenue_customers_2012.pdf |date=March 4, 2016 }}. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology. 63(7), 1426 – 1441.</ref>
SEO began in the mid-[[1990s]], as the first search engines were cataloging the early [[World Wide Web|Web]]. Many site owners quickly learned to appreciate the value of a new listing in a search engine, as they observed sharp spikes in traffic to their sites.
 
== History ==
Site owners soon began submitting their site [[URL]]s to the engines on a regular basis, and began modifying their site to accommodate the needs of [[search engine spider]]s, the software programs sent out to explore the Web. Special features such as [[meta tag]]s became a common feature of sites that sought out high-ranking listings in search engine result pages (the so-called "SERPs").
[[Webmaster]]s and content providers began optimizing websites for search engines in the mid-1990s, as the first search engines were cataloging the early [[World Wide Web|Web]]. Initially, webmasters submitted the address of a page, or [[Uniform Resource Locator|URL]] to the various search engines, which would send a [[web crawler]] to ''crawl'' that page, extract links to other pages from it, and return information found on the page to be [[Index (search engine)|indexed]].<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.thinkpink.com/bp/Thesis/Thesis.pdf| title=Finding What People Want: Experiences with the WebCrawler| access-date=May 7, 2007| publisher=The Second International WWW Conference Chicago, USA, October 17–20, 1994| author=Brian Pinkerton| archive-date=May 8, 2007| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070508124837/http://www.thinkpink.com/bp/Thesis/Thesis.pdf| url-status=live}}</ref>
 
According to a 2004 article by former industry analyst and current [[Google]] employee [[Danny Sullivan (technologist)|Danny Sullivan]], the phrase "search engine optimization" came into use in 1997. Sullivan credits SEO practitioner Bruce Clay as one of the first people to popularize the term.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showpost.php?p=2119&postcount=10|title=Who Invented the Term "Search Engine Optimization"?|author=Danny Sullivan|date=June 14, 2004|publisher=[[Search Engine Watch]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100423051708/http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showpost.php?p=2119|archive-date=23 April 2010|access-date=May 14, 2007}} See [https://groups.google.com/group/alt.current-events.net-abuse.spam/browse_thread/thread/6fee2777dc17b8ab/3858bff94e56aff3?lnk=st&q=%22search+engine+optimization%22&rnum=1#3858bff94e56aff3 Google groups thread] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130617012709/http://groups.google.com/group/alt.current-events.net-abuse.spam/browse_thread/thread/6fee2777dc17b8ab/3858bff94e56aff3?lnk=st&q=%22search+engine+optimization%22&rnum=1#3858bff94e56aff3 |date=June 17, 2013 }}.</ref>
[[Consultant]] firms arose to serve the needs of these site owners, and attempted to develop an understanding of the search engines' internal logic, or [[algorithm]]s. The goal was to develop a set of practices for [[copywriting]], site coding, and submissions that would ensure maximum exposure for a website.
 
Early versions of search [[algorithm]]s relied on webmaster-provided information such as the keyword [[meta tag]] or index files in engines like [[Aliweb|ALIWEB]]. Meta tags provide a guide to each page's content. Using metadata to index pages was found to be less than reliable, however, because the webmaster's choice of keywords in the meta tag could potentially be an inaccurate representation of the site's actual content. Flawed data in meta tags, such as those that were inaccurate or incomplete, created the potential for pages to be mischaracterized in irrelevant searches.<ref>{{Citation|chapter=The Challenge is Open|date=2020-11-17|title=Brain vs Computer|pages=189–211|publisher=WORLD SCIENTIFIC|doi=10.1142/9789811225017_0009|isbn=978-981-12-2500-0|s2cid=243130517}}</ref>{{dubious|date=October 2012}}
As the industry developed, search engines quickly became wary of unscrupulous SEO firms that attempted to generate traffic for their customers at any cost (the most common problem being search results' decreasing relevance). See [[Search_engine_optimization#Unethical_methods|unethical methods]].
 
Web content providers also manipulated attributes within the [[HTML]] source of a page in an attempt to rank well in search engines.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~lloyd/tilde/InterNet/Search/1998_WWW7.html |title=What is a tall poppy among web pages? |date=April 1998 |website=Monash University |access-date=May 8, 2007 |author=Pringle, G. |author2=Allison, L. |author3=Dowe, D. |archive-date=April 27, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070427161650/http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~lloyd/tilde/InterNet/Search/1998_WWW7.html}}</ref> By 1997, search engine designers recognized that webmasters were making efforts to rank in search engines and that some webmasters were [[spamdexing|manipulating their rankings]] in search results by stuffing pages with excessive or irrelevant keywords. Early search engines, such as [[Altavista]] and [[Infoseek]], adjusted their algorithms to prevent webmasters from manipulating rankings.<ref name="infoseeknyt">{{cite news|url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE0DF123BF932A25752C1A960958260|title=Desperately Seeking Surfers|date=November 11, 1996|newspaper=New York Times|author=Laurie J. Flynn|access-date=May 9, 2007|archive-date=October 30, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071030131226/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE0DF123BF932A25752C1A960958260|url-status=live}}</ref>
The search engines responded with a continuous series of countermeasures, designed to filter out the "noise" generated by these artificial techniques. In turn, several SEO companies developed ever-more-subtle techniques to influence rankings.
 
By relying on factors such as [[keyword density]], which were exclusively within a webmaster's control, early search engines suffered from abuse and ranking manipulation. To provide better results to their users, search engines had to adapt to ensure their [[Search engine results page|results page]]s showed the most relevant search results, rather than unrelated pages with numerous keywords by unscrupulous webmasters. This meant moving away from heavy reliance on term density to a more holistic process for scoring semantic signals.<ref name="Forbes">{{cite magazine|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/jaysondemers/2016/01/20/is-keyword-density-still-important-for-seo/2/#2ef69ba36733|title=Is Keyword Density Still Important for SEO|author=Jason Demers|date=January 20, 2016|magazine=Forbes|access-date=August 15, 2016|archive-date=August 16, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160816221641/http://www.forbes.com/sites/jaysondemers/2016/01/20/is-keyword-density-still-important-for-seo/2/#2ef69ba36733|url-status=live}}</ref>
In the early [[2000]], search engines and SEO firms attempted to establish an unofficial '[[truce]]'. There are several tiers of SEO firms, and the most reputable companies employ content-based optimizations which meet with the search engines' (reluctant) approval. These techniques include improvements to site navigation and copywriting, designed to make websites more intelligible to search engine algorithms.
 
Search engines responded by developing more complex [[Search algorithm|ranking algorithms]], taking into account additional factors that were more difficult for webmasters to manipulate.{{Citation needed|date=January 2025}}
Search engines have also reached out to the SEO industry, and are frequent sponsors and guests at SEO conferences and seminars. In fact, with the advent of [[Search_engine_optimization#Paid_inclusion|paid inclusion]], search engines now have a vested interest in the health of the optimization community.
 
Some search engines have also reached out to the SEO industry and are frequent sponsors and guests at SEO conferences, webchats, and seminars. Major search engines provide information and guidelines to help with website optimization.<ref name="g-wmguide" /><ref name="ms-wmguide" /> Google has a [[Sitemaps]] program to help webmasters learn if Google is having any problems indexing their website and also provides data on Google traffic to the website.<ref name="googlesitemaps">{{cite web|url=https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/sitemaps/overview|title=Sitemaps|access-date=July 4, 2012|archive-date=June 22, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230622175619/https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/sitemaps/overview|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Bing Webmaster Center|Bing Webmaster Tools]] provides a way for webmasters to submit a sitemap and web feeds, allows users to determine the "crawl rate", and track the web pages index status.
Search engines originally allowed [[webmaster]]s, as well as SEOs and the general public, to freely submit sites for consideration. However, a pattern of abuse began to develop among less-reputable SEO firms, who flooded the engines with non-stop submissions of pages. Analysis of these submissions strained the search engines' capacity, necessitating the creation of artificial limits, including fees.
 
In 2015, it was reported that [[Google]] was developing and promoting mobile search as a key feature within future products. In response, many brands began to take a different approach to their Internet marketing strategies.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.startupgrind.com/blog/mobile-is-the-internet-for-consumers/ |title="By the Data: For Consumers, Mobile is the Internet" ''Google for Entrepreneurs Startup Grind'' September 20, 2015. |access-date=January 8, 2016 |archive-date=January 6, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160106040341/https://www.startupgrind.com/blog/mobile-is-the-internet-for-consumers/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
==Ethical methods==
 
In the 2020s, the rise of generative AI tools such as [[ChatGPT]], Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini gave rise to discussion around a concept variously referred to as generative engine optimization, answer engine optimization or [[artificial intelligence optimization]]. This approach focuses on optimizing content for inclusion in AI-generated answers provided by [[large language models]] (LLMs). This shift has led digital marketers to discuss content formats, authority signals, and how structured data is presented to make content more "promptable".<ref>{{Cite web | title=What is generative engine optimization (GEO)? | url=https://searchengineland.com/what-is-generative-engine-optimization-geo-444418 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240729150835/https://searchengineland.com/what-is-generative-engine-optimization-geo-444418 | access-date=2025-07-30 | archive-date=2024-07-29}}</ref> It has also been argued that each of these tactics should be considered as subsets of "search experience optimization," described by [[Ahrefs]] as "optimizing a brand’s presence for non-linear search journeys over multiple platforms, not just Google."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gavoyannis |first1=Despina |title=SXO Explained: How to Adapt to the New Era of Search |url=https://ahrefs.com/blog/search-experience-optimization/ |website=Ahrefs}}</ref>
Ethical methods require more effort and time than unethical methods. Search engines attempt to provide relevant search engine results, but relevancy is dependent on the user's perception. However, ethical methods are most likely to result in quality, long-term results as search engines consistently combat spammers. Arguably, the most [[ethics|ethical]] method is to have worthwhile content to which many other web sites will voluntarily link. Another important ethical method is to improve the quality of coding by eliminating validation errors and unnecessary complexity that may interfere with search engine indexing.
 
==Relationship between Google and SEO industry==
===Notify search engines===
In 1998, two graduate students at [[Stanford University]], [[Larry Page]] and [[Sergey Brin]], developed "Backrub", a search engine that relied on a mathematical algorithm to rate the prominence of web pages. The number calculated by the algorithm, [[PageRank]], is a function of the quantity and strength of [[inbound link]]s.<ref name="lgscalehyptxt">{{cite web|author1=Brin, Sergey|author2=Page, Larry|name-list-style=amp|url=http://www-db.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html|title=The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine|publisher=Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web|year=1998|pages=107–117|access-date=May 8, 2007|archive-date=October 10, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061010084452/http://www-db.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html|url-status=live}}</ref> PageRank estimates the likelihood that a given page will be reached by a web user who randomly surfs the web and follows links from one page to another. In effect, this means that some links are stronger than others, as a higher PageRank page is more likely to be reached by the random web surfer.
 
Page and Brin founded Google in 1998.<ref>{{cite web|title=Co-founders of Google - Google's co-founders may not have the name recognition of say, Bill Gates, but give them time: Google hasn't been around nearly as long as Microsoft. |website=Entrepreneur |url=http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/197848|date=2008-10-15|access-date=May 30, 2014|archive-date=May 31, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140531124147/http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/197848|url-status=live}}</ref> Google attracted a loyal following among the growing number of [[Internet]] users, who liked its simple design.<ref name="bbc-1">{{cite news|author=Thompson, Bill|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3334531.stm|title=Is Google good for you?|work=BBC News|date=December 19, 2003|access-date=May 16, 2007|archive-date=January 25, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090125130328/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3334531.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> Off-page factors (such as PageRank and hyperlink analysis) were considered as well as on-page factors (such as keyword frequency, [[meta tags]], headings, links and site structure) to enable Google to avoid the kind of manipulation seen in search engines that only considered on-page factors for their rankings. Although PageRank was more difficult to [[Gaming the system|game]], webmasters had already developed link-building tools and schemes to influence the [[Inktomi]] search engine, and these methods proved similarly applicable to gaming PageRank. Many sites focus on exchanging, buying, and selling links, often on a massive scale. Some of these schemes involved the creation of thousands of sites for the sole purpose of [[spamdexing|link spamming]].<ref>{{cite web|author1=Zoltan Gyongyi|author2=Hector Garcia-Molina|name-list-style=amp|url=http://infolab.stanford.edu/~zoltan/publications/gyongyi2005link.pdf|title=Link Spam Alliances|publisher=Proceedings of the 31st VLDB Conference, Trondheim, Norway|year=2005|access-date=May 9, 2007|archive-date=June 12, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070612023948/http://infolab.stanford.edu/~zoltan/publications/gyongyi2005link.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
The first step is to notify the search engines of the existence of the site. This is accomplished by various means, the easiest of which is a link from a different site. Search engine spiders will follow that link and make a note of the sites's existence in the search engine's index. This method is also preffered as it results in an [[inbound link]]. Another option is to submit your site's URL manually to search engine and other directories, such as [[DMOZ]]. Thirdly, the major search engines have paid business directories (paid inclusion) that result in more timely inclusion.
 
By 2004, search engines had incorporated a wide range of undisclosed factors in their ranking algorithms to reduce the impact of link manipulation.<ref name="nyt0607">{{cite news|newspaper=New York Times|access-date=June 6, 2007|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/03/business/yourmoney/03google.html|title=Google Keeps Tweaking Its Search Engine|date=June 3, 2007|first=Saul|last=Hansell|archive-date=November 10, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171110133529/https://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/03/business/yourmoney/03google.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The leading search engines, Google, [[Bing (search engine)|Bing]], and [[Yahoo]], do not disclose the algorithms they use to rank pages. Some SEO practitioners have studied different approaches to search engine optimization and have shared their personal opinions.<ref>{{cite web |first=Danny |last=Sullivan |url=https://www.searchenginewatch.com/2005/09/29/rundown-on-search-ranking-factors/ |title=Rundown On Search Ranking Factors |publisher=[[Search Engine Watch]] |date=September 29, 2005 |access-date=May 8, 2007 |author-link=Danny Sullivan (technologist) |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070528133132/http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050929-072711 |archive-date=May 28, 2007 }}</ref> Patents related to search engines can provide information to better understand search engines.<ref>{{cite web|author=Christine Churchill|url=http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3564261|title=Understanding Search Engine Patents|publisher=[[Search Engine Watch]]|date=November 23, 2005|access-date=May 8, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070207222630/http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3564261|archive-date=February 7, 2007|df=mdy-all}}</ref> In 2005, Google began personalizing search results for each user. Depending on their history of previous searches, Google crafted results for logged in users.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://searchenginewatch.com/3563036|title=Google Personalized Search Leaves Google Labs|work=searchenginewatch.com|publisher=Search Engine Watch|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090125065500/https://www.searchenginewatch.com/3563036|archive-date=January 25, 2009|access-date=September 5, 2009}}</ref>
===Content optimization===
 
In 2007, Google announced a campaign against paid links that transfer PageRank.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-things-we-learned-about-google-pagerank/5897/|title=8 Things We Learned About Google PageRank|date=October 25, 2007|publisher=www.searchenginejournal.com|access-date=August 17, 2009|archive-date=August 19, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090819080745/http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-things-we-learned-about-google-pagerank/5897/|url-status=live}}</ref> On June 15, 2009, Google disclosed that they had taken measures to mitigate the effects of PageRank sculpting by use of the [[nofollow]] attribute on links. [[Matt Cutts]], a well-known software engineer at Google, announced that Google Bot would no longer treat any no follow links, in the same way, to prevent SEO service providers from using nofollow for PageRank sculpting.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/|title=PageRank sculpting|publisher=Matt Cutts|access-date=January 12, 2010|archive-date=January 6, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100106120723/http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/|url-status=live}}</ref> As a result of this change, the usage of nofollow led to evaporation of PageRank. In order to avoid the above, SEO engineers developed alternative techniques that replace nofollowed tags with obfuscated [[JavaScript]] and thus permit PageRank sculpting. Additionally, several solutions have been suggested that include the usage of [[HTML element#Frames|iframe]]s, [[Flash animation|Flash]], and JavaScript.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://searchengineland.com/google-loses-backwards-compatibility-on-paid-link-blocking-pagerank-sculpting-20408 |title=Google Loses "Backwards Compatibility" On Paid Link Blocking & PageRank Sculpting |date=June 3, 2009 |publisher=searchengineland.com |access-date=August 17, 2009 |archive-date=August 14, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090814212229/http://searchengineland.com/google-loses-backwards-compatibility-on-paid-link-blocking-pagerank-sculpting-20408/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
A site may contain many commonly-searched keywords but these will not show up on the first pages of a search if they are not deemed 'important' For example, if a webpage is started and it contains the word 'Wikipedia' and subsequently 'Wikipedia' is typed into Google, the chances of the newly created site appearing in even the first million results is slim.
 
In December 2009, Google announced it would be using the web search history of all its users in order to populate search results.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/personalized-search-for-everyone.html|title=Personalized Search for everyone|access-date=December 14, 2009|archive-date=December 8, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091208140917/http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/personalized-search-for-everyone.html|url-status=live}}</ref> On June 8, 2010 a new web indexing system called [[Google Caffeine]] was announced. Designed to allow users to find news results, forum posts, and other content much sooner after publishing than before, Google Caffeine was a change to the way Google updated its index in order to make things show up quicker on Google than before. According to Carrie Grimes, the software engineer who announced Caffeine for Google, "Caffeine provides 50 percent fresher results for web searches than our last index..."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html |title=Our new search index: Caffeine |publisher=Google: Official Blog |access-date=May 10, 2014 |archive-date=June 18, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100618160021/http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Google Instant]], real-time-search, was introduced in late 2010 in an attempt to make search results more timely and relevant. Historically site administrators have spent months or even years optimizing a website to increase search rankings. With the growth in popularity of social media sites and blogs, the leading engines made changes to their algorithms to allow fresh content to rank quickly within the search results.<ref>{{cite web |title=Relevance Meets Real-Time Web |publisher=[[Google Blog]] |url=https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/relevance-meets-real-time-web.html |access-date=January 4, 2010 |archive-date=April 7, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190407221454/http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/relevance-meets-real-time-web.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
The content of each webpage is objectively evaluated by analyzing included keywords. While previous analysis used the now out-dated keyword density method, the analysis now includes factors such as proximity, distribution, co-occurence, and on-topic issues.
 
Google has implemented numerous algorithm updates to improve search quality, including Panda (2011) for content quality, Penguin (2012) for link spam, Hummingbird (2013) for natural language processing, and BERT (2019) for query understanding. These updates reflect the ongoing evolution of search technology and Google's efforts to combat spam while improving user experience.
Methods commonly used to optimize content include:
 
On May 20, 2025, Google announced that AI Mode would be released to all US users. AI Mode uses what Google calls a "query fan-out technique" which breaks down the search query into multiple sub-topics which generates additional search queries for the user.<ref>{{cite web|title=AI in Search: Going beyond information to intelligence|url=https://blog.google/products/search/google-search-ai-mode-update/|website=blog.google.com|date=May 20, 2025|access-date=23 June 2025}}</ref>
*Choosing a [[___domain name]] that accurately represents the content
*Including keywords in the site's directory and file names
*Using concise page titles that include keywords
*Writing META descriptions the summarize each page's content
*Emphasizing each page's main topic with H1 heading [[HTML element|tags]], and sub-topics with H2, H3, and lesser heading tags
*Centering each web page on a small number of keywords
*Provide alternative methods for viewing content that is not spidered well (such as [[Micromedia_flash|Flash]] and frames)
*Including keywords in the [[alt attribute]] of graphics
*Emphasizing quality and originality (over copied or duplicated content that is penalized by most search engines)
*Including fresh and frequently updated content
*Adding a "[[site map]]" page to guarantee effective spidering of entire site
*Avoiding excessive numbers of [[web link|links]] on any page
*Organizing site navigation so that pages are only a few jumps away from the home page
*Dividing large pages into smaller, more easily focused pages
*Increasing the amount of content on each page so that there are at least 100 - 250 words per page
 
== Methods ==
===PageRank improvement===
 
=== Getting indexed ===
Link popularity is an important factor for high importance rankings. Google introduced the concept of [[PageRank]] as an indicator of an individual page's value based on the quantity and quality of links pointing to it. Inbound links are weighted by the popularity of the linking site. For example, a link from en.wikipedia.org would be a greater contributor to a page's rank than a link from an unpopular blog or unknown site.
[[File:PageRanks-Example.svg|thumb|A simple illustration of the [[PageRank|Pagerank]] algorithm. Percentage shows the perceived importance.]]
The leading search engines, such as Google, Bing, [[Brave Search]] and Yahoo!, use [[Web crawler|crawlers]] to find pages for their algorithmic search results. Pages that are linked from other search engine-indexed pages do not need to be submitted because they are found automatically. The [[Yahoo! Directory]] and [[DMOZ]], two major directories which closed in 2014 and 2017 respectively, both required manual submission and human editorial review.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=2167881|title=Submitting To Directories: Yahoo & The Open Directory|date=March 12, 2007|access-date=May 15, 2007|publisher=[[Search Engine Watch]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070519052103/http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=2167881|archive-date=May 19, 2007|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Google offers [[Google Webmaster Tools|Google Search Console]], for which an XML [[Sitemap]] feed can be created and submitted for free to ensure that all pages are found, especially pages that are not discoverable by automatically following links<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=40318&topic=8514|title=What is a Sitemap file and why should I have one?|access-date=March 19, 2007|archive-date=July 1, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070701232719/http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=40318&topic=8514|url-status=live}}</ref> in addition to their URL submission console.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/submit-url |title=Search Console - Crawl URL |access-date=2015-12-18 |archive-date=August 14, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220814100500/https://accounts.google.com/_/bscframe |url-status=live }}</ref> Yahoo! formerly operated a paid submission service that guaranteed to crawl for a [[Pay per click|cost per click]];<ref>{{cite web|url=http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=2167871|title=Submitting To Search Crawlers: Google, Yahoo, Ask & Microsoft's Live Search|date=March 12, 2007|access-date=May 15, 2007|publisher=[[Search Engine Watch]] |first1= Danny |last1=Sullivan |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070510090932/http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=2167871#Teoma|archive-date=May 10, 2007|df=mdy-all}}</ref> however, this practice was discontinued in 2009.
 
[[Web search engine|Search engine]] crawlers may look at a number of different factors when [[Web crawler|crawling]] a site. Not every page is indexed by search engines. The distance of pages from the root directory of a site may also be a factor in whether or not pages get crawled.<ref name="cho">{{cite web|url=http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/347/|title=Efficient crawling through URL ordering|author1=Cho, J. |author2=Garcia-Molina, H. |author3=Page, L. |year=1998|work=Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference |___location=Brisbane, Australia |publisher=Stanford InfoLab Publication Server |access-date=May 9, 2007|archive-date=July 14, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190714141416/http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/347/}}</ref>
[[Blogg]]ing can be a cheap but effective method of obtaining links. However, avoid spamming techniques such as link dropping. Forum moderators and blog owners find them annoying and will remove them quickly. The contents of blog surveyors, such as [[Blogpulse]], will reflect what people write about in their blogs and is a good starting point for search engine optimization-oriented blogging.
 
Mobile devices are used for the majority of Google searches.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2016/11/mobile-first-indexing.html|title=Mobile-first Index|access-date=March 19, 2018|archive-date=February 22, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190222000527/https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2016/11/mobile-first-indexing.html|url-status=live}}</ref> In November 2016, Google announced a major change to the way they are crawling websites and started to make their index mobile-first, which means the mobile version of a given website becomes the starting point for what Google includes in their index.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Phan |first1=Doantam |title=Mobile-first Indexing |url=https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2016/11/mobile-first-indexing.html |website=Official Google Webmaster Central Blog |access-date=16 January 2019 |date=4 November 2016 |archive-date=February 22, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190222000527/https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2016/11/mobile-first-indexing.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In May 2019, Google updated the rendering engine of their crawler to be the latest version of Chromium (74 at the time of the announcement). Google indicated that they would regularly update the [[Chromium (web browser)|Chromium]] rendering engine to the latest version.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2019/05/the-new-evergreen-googlebot.html|title=The new evergreen Googlebot|website=Official Google Webmaster Central Blog|language=en|access-date=2020-03-02|archive-date=November 6, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201106072307/https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2019/05/the-new-evergreen-googlebot.html|url-status=live}}</ref> In December 2019, Google began updating the User-Agent string of their crawler to reflect the latest Chrome version used by their rendering service. The delay was to allow webmasters time to update their code that responded to particular bot User-Agent strings. Google ran evaluations and felt confident the impact would be minor.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2019/10/updating-user-agent-of-googlebot.html|title=Updating the user agent of Googlebot|website=Official Google Webmaster Central Blog|language=en|access-date=2020-03-02|archive-date=March 2, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200302132028/https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2019/10/updating-user-agent-of-googlebot.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
Controversy can also bring in a lot of inbound links as both fans and haters link to the controversial site.
 
=== Preventing crawling ===
Conventional off-line advertising, such as flyers, t-shirts, hats, stickers, billboards, etc., can also be used to attract visitors to the site which will result in more inbound links. This method, however, is not as easy to track as online methods.
{{main|Robots exclusion standard}}
To avoid undesirable content in the search indexes, webmasters can instruct spiders not to crawl certain files or directories through the standard [[robots.txt]] file in the root directory of the ___domain. Additionally, a page can be explicitly excluded from a search engine's database by using a [[meta tag]] specific to robots (usually <meta name="robots" content="noindex"> ). When a search engine visits a site, the robots.txt located in the [[root directory]] is the first file crawled. The robots.txt file is then parsed and will instruct the robot as to which pages are not to be crawled. As a search engine crawler may keep a cached copy of this file, it may on occasion crawl pages a webmaster does not wish to crawl. Pages typically prevented from being crawled include login-specific pages such as shopping carts and user-specific content such as search results from internal searches. In March 2007, Google warned webmasters that they should prevent indexing of internal search results because those pages are considered search spam.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://searchengineland.com/newspapers-amok-new-york-times-spamming-google-la-times-hijacking-carscom-11169|title=Newspapers Amok! New York Times Spamming Google? LA Times Hijacking Cars.com?|publisher=[[Search Engine Land]]|date=May 8, 2007|access-date=May 9, 2007|archive-date=December 26, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081226161450/http://searchengineland.com/newspapers-amok-new-york-times-spamming-google-la-times-hijacking-carscom-11169|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
In 2020, Google [[Sunset provision|sunsetted]] the standard (and open-sourced their code) and now treats it as a hint rather than a directive. To adequately ensure that pages are not indexed, a page-level robot's meta tag should be included.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.practicalecommerce.com/google-downgrades-nofollow-directive-now-what|title=Google Downgrades Nofollow Directive. Now What?|publisher=Practical Ecommerce|author=Jill Kocher Brown|date=February 24, 2020|access-date=2021-02-11|archive-date=January 25, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210125080754/https://www.practicalecommerce.com/google-downgrades-nofollow-directive-now-what|url-status=live}}</ref>
===Paid inclusion===
 
=== Increasing prominence ===
[[Paid inclusion]] is a fee-based model for submitting website listings to search engines. The fee structure is used by search engines as a filter against superfluous submissions, and also as a revenue generator. Typically, the fee covers an annual subscription for one webpage, which will automatically be cataloged on a regular basis. A per-click fee may also apply. Each search engine is different. Some sites only allow paid inclusion, although these have had little success. More frequently, many search engines, like Yahoo, mix paid inclusion (per-page and per-click fee) with results from web crawling. Others like Google do not let webmasters pay to be in their search engine listing (advertisements are shown separately and labelled as such). Often the line between [[pay-per-click]] advertising and paid inclusion is debatable. Some have lobbied for any paid listing to be labelled as an advertisement. While, defenders insist they are not actually ads since the webmasters do not control the content of the listing, its ranking, or even whether its shown to any users.
A variety of methods can increase the prominence of a webpage within the search results. [[Methods of website linking|Cross linking]] between pages of the same website to provide more links to important pages may improve its visibility. Page design makes users trust a site and want to stay once they find it. When people bounce off a site, it counts against the site and affects its credibility.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|last=Morey|first=Sean|title=The Digital Writer.|publisher=Fountainhead Press|year=2008|pages=171–187}}</ref>
 
Writing content that includes frequently searched keyword phrases so as to be relevant to a wide variety of search queries will tend to increase traffic. Updating content so as to keep search engines crawling back frequently can give additional weight to a site. Adding relevant keywords to a web page's metadata, including the [[HEAD tag|title tag and meta description]], will tend to improve the relevancy of a site's search listings, thus increasing traffic. [[URL canonicalization]] of web pages accessible via multiple URLs, using the [[canonical link element]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://blogs.bing.com/webmaster/2009/02/12/partnering-to-help-solve-duplicate-content-issues|title=Bing – Partnering to help solve duplicate content issues – Webmaster Blog – Bing Community|date=February 12, 2009 |publisher=www.bing.com|access-date=October 30, 2009|archive-date=June 7, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140607164839/http://blogs.bing.com/webmaster/2009/02/12/partnering-to-help-solve-duplicate-content-issues/|url-status=live}}</ref> or via [[301 redirect]]s can help make sure links to different versions of the URL all count towards the page's link popularity score. These are known as incoming links, which point to the URL and can count towards the page link's popularity score, impacting the credibility of a website.<ref name=":0" /> <!--add ref here to Rhea Drysdale article on PageRank and Playdoh-->
SEOs often use paid inclusion, since they can quickly get their pages into the web index, test out of different approaches to improving ranking, and see the results, often within a couple days, instead of waiting weeks or months. Sometimes knowledge gained is then used to optimize other web pages, without payment.
 
=== White hat versus black hat techniques ===
==Unethical methods==
[[File:Demystifying Search Engine Optimization -viz notes- -wcyvr (8084222814).jpg|thumb|400x400px|Common white-hat methods of search engine optimization]]
SEO techniques can be classified into two broad categories: techniques that search engine companies recommend as part of good design ("white hat"), and those techniques of which search engines do not approve ("black hat"). Search engines attempt to minimize the effect of the latter, among them [[spamdexing]]. Industry commentators have classified these methods and the practitioners who employ them as either [[White hat (computer security)|white hat]] SEO or [[black hat hacking|black hat]] SEO.<ref>{{cite web|author=Andrew Goodman|publisher=SearchEngineWatch|url=http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3483941|title=Search Engine Showdown: Black hats vs. White hats at SES|access-date=May 9, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070222004138/http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3483941|archive-date=February 22, 2007|df=mdy-all}}</ref> White hats tend to produce results that last a long time, whereas black hats anticipate that their sites may eventually be banned either temporarily or permanently once the search engines discover what they are doing.<ref>{{cite web|author=Jill Whalen|url=http://www.searchengineguide.com/whalen/2004/1116_jw1.html|title=Black Hat/White Hat Search Engine Optimization|publisher=searchengineguide.com|access-date=May 9, 2007|date=November 16, 2004|author-link=Jill Whalen
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041117131237/http://www.searchengineguide.com/whalen/2004/1116_jw1.html
|archive-date=17 November 2004}}</ref>
 
An SEO technique is considered a white hat if it conforms to the search engines' guidelines and involves no deception. As the search engine guidelines<ref name="g-wmguide">{{cite web|url=http://www.google.com/webmasters/guidelines.html|title=Google's Guidelines on Site Design|access-date=April 18, 2007|archive-date=January 9, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090109073316/http://www.google.com./webmasters/guidelines.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="ms-wmguide">{{cite web|url=http://www.bing.com/webmaster/help/webmaster-guidelines-30fba23a|title=Bing Webmaster Guidelines|publisher=bing.com|access-date=September 11, 2014|archive-date=September 9, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140909120222/http://www.bing.com/webmaster/help/webmaster-guidelines-30fba23a|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.google.com/webmasters/seo.html|title=What's an SEO? Does Google recommend working with companies that offer to make my site Google-friendly?|access-date=April 18, 2007|archive-date=April 16, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060416054734/http://www.google.com/webmasters/seo.html|url-status=live}}</ref> are not written as a series of rules or commandments, this is an important distinction to note. White hat SEO is not just about following guidelines but is about ensuring that the content a search engine indexes and subsequently ranks is the same content a user will see. White hat advice is generally summed up as creating content for users, not for search engines, and then making that content easily accessible to the online "spider" algorithms, rather than attempting to trick the algorithm from its intended purpose. White hat SEO is in many ways similar to web development that promotes accessibility,<ref>{{cite web|author=Andy Hagans|publisher=[[A List Apart]]|url=http://alistapart.com/articles/accessibilityseo|title=High Accessibility Is Effective Search Engine Optimization|date=November 8, 2005|access-date=May 9, 2007|archive-date=May 4, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070504054044/http://www.alistapart.com/articles/accessibilityseo/|url-status=live}}</ref> although the two are not identical.
[[Keyword spamming]] (or [[keyword stuffing]]) involves the insertion of hidden, random text at the bottom of a webpage. The inserted text usually includes words that are frequently searched (such as "sex"), with the goal of increasing rankings and access to large streams of traffic.
 
[[spamdexing|Black hat SEO]] attempts to improve rankings in ways that are disapproved of by the search engines or involve deception. One black hat technique uses hidden text, either as text colored similar to the background, in an invisible [[Span and div|div]], or positioned off-screen. Another method gives a different page depending on whether the page is being requested by a human visitor or a search engine, a technique known as [[cloaking]]. Another category sometimes used is [[Grey hat|grey hat SEO]]. This is in between the black hat and white hat approaches, where the methods employed avoid the site being penalized but do not act in producing the best content for users. Grey hat SEO is entirely focused on improving search engine rankings.
[[Spamdexing]] is the promotion of irrelevant, chiefly commercial, pages through abuse of the search algorithms. Many search engine administrators consider any form of search engine optimization used to improve a website's page rank as spamdexing. However, over time a widespread consensus has developed in the industry as to what are and are not acceptable means of boosting one's search engine placement and resultant traffic.
 
Search engines may penalize sites they discover using black or grey hat methods, either by reducing their rankings or eliminating their listings from their databases altogether. Such penalties can be applied either automatically by the search engines' algorithms or by a manual site review. One example was the February 2006 Google removal of both [[BMW]] Germany and [[Ricoh]] Germany for the use of deceptive practices.<ref name="intwebspam">{{cite web|url=http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ramping-up-on-international-webspam/|publisher=mattcutts.com/blog|title=Ramping up on international webspam|author=Matt Cutts|date=February 4, 2006|access-date=May 9, 2007|author-link=Matt Cutts|archive-date=June 29, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120629051407/http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ramping-up-on-international-webspam/|url-status=live}}</ref> Both companies subsequently apologized, fixed the offending pages, and were restored to Google's search engine results page.<ref>{{cite web|access-date=May 9, 2007|url=http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/|publisher=mattcutts.com/blog|title=Recent reinclusions|author=Matt Cutts|date=February 7, 2006|author-link=Matt Cutts|archive-date=May 22, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070522130714/http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/|url-status=live}}</ref>
[[Cloaking]] refers to any of several means to serve up a different page to the search-engine spider than will be seen by human users. It can be an illegitimate attempt to mislead search engines regarding the content on a particular web site. It should be noted, however, that cloaking can also be used to ethically increase accessibility of a site to users with disabilities, or to provide human users with more or less equivalent content that a search engine would not be able to process or parse. A good benchmark on whether a given act of cloaking is ethical is precisely whether it enhances accessibility.
 
Companies that employ black hat techniques or other spammy tactics can get their client websites banned from the search results. In 2005, the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' reported on a company, [[Traffic Power]], which allegedly used high-risk techniques and failed to disclose those risks to its clients.<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=[[Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB112714166978744925?apl=y&r=947596|title=Sites Get Dropped by Search Engines After Trying to 'Optimize' Rankings|author=David Kesmodel|date=September 22, 2005|access-date=July 30, 2008|archive-date=August 4, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200804125356/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB112714166978744925?apl=y&r=947596|url-status=live}}</ref> ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' magazine reported that the same company sued blogger and SEO Aaron Wall for writing about the ban.<ref name="wired09082005">{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Wired Magazine]]|url=http://archive.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2005/09/68799?currentPage=all|title=Legal Showdown in Search Fracas|date=September 8, 2005|author=Adam L. Penenberg|access-date=August 11, 2016|archive-date=March 4, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304055056/http://archive.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2005/09/68799?currentPage=all|url-status=live}}</ref> Google's [[Matt Cutts]] later confirmed that Google had banned Traffic Power and some of its clients.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=mattcutts.com/blog|author=Matt Cutts|url=http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/confirming-a-penalty/|title=Confirming a penalty|date=February 2, 2006|access-date=May 9, 2007|author-link=Matt Cutts|archive-date=June 26, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120626093828/http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/confirming-a-penalty/|url-status=live}}</ref>
[[Link spam]] is the placing or solicitation of links randomly on other sites, placing a desired keyword into the hyperlinked text of the inbound link. Commonly called "[[Googlebombing]]", it can be a prank (type "[[miserable failure]]" into Google to demonstrate), or a deliberate attempt to influence ranking for commercial gain.
 
== As marketing strategy ==
The following techniques are also widely acknowledged as being [[spam]], or "[[black hat]]":
SEO represents one approach within digital marketing, alongside other strategies such as pay-per-click advertising and social media marketing. [[Search engine marketing|Search engine marketing (SEM)]] is the practice of designing, running, and optimizing search engine ad campaigns. Its difference from SEO is most simply depicted as the difference between paid and unpaid priority ranking in search results. SEM focuses on prominence more so than relevance; website developers should regard SEM with the utmost importance with consideration to visibility as most navigate to the primary listings of their search.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Tapan|first=Panda|year=2013|title=Search Engine Marketing: Does the Knowledge Discovery Process Help Online Retailers?|journal=IUP Journal of Knowledge Management|volume=11|issue=3|pages=56–66|id={{ProQuest|1430517207}}}}</ref> A successful Internet marketing campaign may also depend upon building high-quality web pages to engage and persuade internet users, setting up [[web analytics|analytics]] programs to enable site owners to measure results, and improving a site's [[conversion rate]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/03/13/the-battle-between-search-engine-optimization-and-conversion-who-wins/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080315221733/http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/03/13/the-battle-between-search-engine-optimization-and-conversion-who-wins |archive-date=March 15, 2008 |title=The Battle Between Search Engine Optimization and Conversion: Who Wins? |author=Melissa Burdon |publisher=Grok.com |access-date=April 10, 2017 |date=March 13, 2007 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last= |first= |date= |title=SEO Tips and Marketing Strategies |url=https://skyrocketresultsseo.com/hvac/seo/ |access-date=2022-10-30 |website= |language=en-US |archive-date=October 30, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221030122434/https://skyrocketresultsseo.com/hvac/seo/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In November 2015, Google released a full 160-page version of its Search Quality Rating Guidelines to the public,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/en//insidesearch/howsearchworks/assets/searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf |title="Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines" ''How Search Works'' November 12, 2015. |access-date=January 11, 2016 |archive-date=March 29, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190329234138/http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/en//insidesearch/howsearchworks/assets/searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> which revealed a shift in their focus towards "usefulness" and [[mobile local search]]. In recent years the mobile market has exploded, overtaking the use of desktops, as shown in by [[StatCounter]] in October 2016, where they analyzed 2.5 million websites and found that 51.3% of the pages were loaded by a mobile device.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Titcomb|first1=James|title=Mobile web usage overtakes desktop for first time|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/11/01/mobile-web-usage-overtakes-desktop-for-first-time/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/11/01/mobile-web-usage-overtakes-desktop-for-first-time/ |archive-date=January 10, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|newspaper=The Telegraph|date=November 2016|access-date=17 March 2018}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Google has been one of the companies that are utilizing the popularity of mobile usage by encouraging websites to use their [[Google Search Console]], the Mobile-Friendly Test, which allows companies to measure up their website to the search engine results and determine how user-friendly their websites are. The closer the keywords are together their ranking will improve based on key terms.<ref name=":0" />
 
SEO may generate an adequate [[return on investment]]. However, search engines are not paid for organic search traffic, their algorithms change, and there are no guarantees of continued referrals. Due to this lack of guarantee and uncertainty, a business that relies heavily on search engine traffic can suffer major losses if the search engines stop sending visitors.<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Forbes]] |url=https://www.forbes.com/technology/2007/04/29/sanar-google-skyfacet-tech-cx_ag_0430googhell.html?partner=rss |title=Condemned To Google Hell |author=Andy Greenberg |date=April 30, 2007 |access-date=May 9, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070502074629/http://www.forbes.com/technology/2007/04/29/sanar-google-skyfacet-tech-cx_ag_0430googhell.html?partner=rss |archive-date=May 2, 2007 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> Search engines can change their algorithms, impacting a website's search engine ranking, possibly resulting in a serious loss of traffic. According to Google's CEO, [[Eric Schmidt]], in 2010, Google made over 500 algorithm changes – almost 1.5 per day.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://searchengineland.com/13000-precision-evaluations-schmidts-testimony-reveals-how-google-tests-algorithm-changes-93740|title=Schmidt's testimony reveals how Google tests algorithm changes|author=Matt McGee|date=September 21, 2011|access-date=January 4, 2012|archive-date=January 17, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120117152309/http://searchengineland.com/13000-precision-evaluations-schmidts-testimony-reveals-how-google-tests-algorithm-changes-93740|url-status=live}}</ref> Industry analysts note that websites may face risks from algorithm changes that can significantly impact organic traffic. In addition to accessibility in terms of web crawlers (addressed above), user [[web accessibility]] has become increasingly important for SEO.
* [[Mirror site]]s
* [[Doorway page]]s
* [[Link farm]]s
* [[Googleating]]
 
== International markets and SEO ==
==See also==
Optimization techniques are highly tuned to the dominant search engines in the target market. The search engines' market shares vary from market to market, as does competition. Google has maintained dominant market share in most regions, with varying percentages by market.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2003-08-25-google_x.htm|title=The search engine that could|newspaper=USA Today|access-date=May 15, 2007|date=August 26, 2003|first1=Jefferson|last1=Graham|archive-date=May 17, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070517051318/http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2003-08-25-google_x.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> In markets outside the United States, Google's share is often larger, and data showed Google was the dominant search engine worldwide as of 2007.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2066064/Stats-Show-Google-Dominates-the-International-Search-Landscape | author=Greg Jarboe | title=Stats Show Google Dominates the International Search Landscape | publisher=[[Search Engine Watch]] | date=February 22, 2007 | access-date=May 15, 2007 | archive-date=May 23, 2011 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110523154641/http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2066064/Stats-Show-Google-Dominates-the-International-Search-Landscape | url-status=live }}</ref> As of 2006, Google had an 85–90% market share in Germany.<ref name="grehan-1">{{cite web|url=http://www.clickz.com/clickz/column/1702507/search-engine-optimizing-europe|title=Search Engine Optimizing for Europe|author=Mike Grehan|date=April 3, 2006|access-date=May 14, 2007|publisher=Click|archive-date=November 6, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101106014727/http://www.clickz.com/clickz/column/1702507/search-engine-optimizing-europe|url-status=live}}</ref> As of March 2024, Google still had a significant market share of 89.85% in Germany.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Germany search engine market share 2024 |url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/445974/search-engines-market-share-of-desktop-and-mobile-search-germany/#statisticContainer |access-date=2025-01-06 |website=Statista |language=en}}</ref> As of March 2024, Google's market share in the UK was 93.61%.<ref>{{Cite web |title=UK search engines market share 2024 |url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/280269/market-share-held-by-search-engines-in-the-united-kingdom/ |access-date=2025-01-06 |website=Statista |language=en}}</ref>
* [[Nigritude ultramarine]]
* [[Seraphim proudleduck]]
* [[Google consultant]]
* [[Search engine]]
 
Successful search engine optimization (SEO) for international markets requires more than just translating web pages. It may also involve registering a ___domain name with a [[Country code top-level ___domain|country-code top-level ___domain]] (ccTLD) or a relevant [[top-level ___domain]] (TLD) for the target market, choosing web hosting with a local IP address or server, and using a [[Content delivery network|Content Delivery Network]] (CDN) to improve website speed and performance globally. It is also important to understand the local culture so that the content feels relevant to the audience. This includes conducting keyword research for each market, using hreflang tags to target the right languages, and building local backlinks. However, the core SEO principles—such as creating high-quality content, improving user experience, and building links—remain the same, regardless of language or region.<ref name="grehan-1" />
==References==
*{{Web reference | title=Company Overview | work=Google | URL=http://www.google.com/corporate/ | date=May 26 | year=2005}}
*{{Web reference | title=Editorial Guidelines for Ask.com | work=Ask Jeeves | URL=http://sp.ask.com/docs/about/policy.html | date=May 26 | year=2005}}
*{{Citepaper | Author=Brin, Sergey; Page, Lawrence | Title=The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine | PublishYear=? | URL=http://www-db.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html}}
*{{Web reference | title=Our Search: Google Technology | work=Google | URL=http://www.google.com/technology/ | date=June 11 | year=2005}}
*{{Citenewsauthor | surname=Garcia | given=E. | title=The Keyword Density of Non-Sense | date=March 2005 | org=E-Marketing News | url=http://www.e-marketing-news.co.uk/Mar05/garcia.html}}
*{{Book reference | Author=Kent, Peter | Title=Search Engine Optimization For Dummies | Publisher=Wiley Publishing Inc. | Year=2004 | ID=ISBN 0-7645-6758-6}}
 
Regional search engines have a strong presence in specific markets:
==External links==
*Guidelines for webmasters
**[http://www.google.com/webmasters/seo.html Google ]
**[http://search.msn.com/docs/siteowner.aspx?t=SEARCH_WEBMASTER_REF_GuidelinesforOptimizingSite.htm MSN Search]
**[http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/ysearch/deletions/deletions-05.html Yahoo!]
 
* China: [[Baidu]] leads the market, controlling about 70 to 80% market share.<ref>{{Cite web |title=China search engines market share 2024 |url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/253340/market-share-of-search-engines-in-china-pageviews/ |access-date=2025-01-06 |website=Statista |language=en}}</ref>
[[Category:Internet terminology]]
* South Korea: Since the end of 2021, [[Naver]], a domestic web portal, has gained prominence in the country.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=cycles |first1=This text provides general information Statista assumes no liability for the information given being complete or correct Due to varying update |last2=Text |first2=Statistics Can Display More up-to-Date Data Than Referenced in the |title=Topic: Search engines in South Korea |url=https://www.statista.com/topics/10655/search-engines-in-south-korea/#topicOverview |access-date=2025-01-06 |website=Statista |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=South Korea: main service used to search for information 2024 |url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/1115944/south-korea-main-service-used-to-search-for-information/ |access-date=2025-01-06 |website=Statista |language=en}}</ref>
[[Category:Search engine optimization| ]]
* Russia: [[Yandex]] is the leading search engine in Russia. As of December 2023, it accounted for at least 63.8% of the market share.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Most popular search engines in Russia 2023 |url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/1094920/leading-search-engines-by-visits-share-russia/ |access-date=2025-01-06 |website=Statista |language=en}}</ref>
 
=== Multilingual SEO ===
[[cs:SEO]]
By the early 2000s, businesses recognized that the web and search engines could help them reach global audiences. As a result, the need for multilingual SEO emerged.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Arora |first1=Sanjog |last2=Hemrajani |first2=Naveen |date=September 2023 |title=A REVIEW ON: MULTILINGUAL SEARCH TECHNIQUE |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382274152 |journal=International Journal of Applied Engineering & Technology |volume=5 |issue=3 |pages=760–770 |via=ResearchGate}}</ref> In the early years of international SEO development, simple translation was seen as sufficient. However, over time, it became clear that localization and transcreation—adapting content to local language, culture, and emotional resonance—were more effective than basic translation.<ref>{{Cite web |title=SEO Starter Guide: The Basics {{!}} Google Search Central {{!}} Documentation |url=https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/seo-starter-guide |access-date=2025-01-13 |website=Google for Developers |language=en}}</ref>
[[de:Suchmaschinen-Optimierung]]
 
[[es:Search engine optimization]]
== Legal precedents ==
[[nl:Zoekmachine optimalisatie]]
On October 17, 2002, SearchKing filed suit in the [[United States district court|United States District Court]], Western District of Oklahoma, against the search engine Google. SearchKing's claim was that Google's tactics to prevent spamdexing constituted a [[tortious interference]] with contractual relations. <!-- This may be compared to lawsuits that email spammers have filed against spam-fighters, as in various cases against MAPS and other [[DNSBL]]s. --> On May 27, 2003, the court granted Google's motion to dismiss the complaint because SearchKing "failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.docstoc.com/docs/618281/Order-(Granting-Googles-Motion-to-Dismiss-Search-Kings-Complaint)|format=PDF|publisher=docstoc.com|title=Search King, Inc. v. Google Technology, Inc., CIV-02-1457-M|date=May 27, 2003|access-date=May 23, 2008|archive-date=May 27, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080527012138/http://www.docstoc.com/docs/618281/Order-(Granting-Googles-Motion-to-Dismiss-Search-Kings-Complaint)|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.cnet.com/2100-1032_3-1011740.html|title=Judge dismisses suit against Google|website=[[CNET]]|author=Stefanie Olsen|access-date=May 10, 2007|date=May 30, 2003|archive-date=December 1, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101201180530/http://news.cnet.com/2100-1032_3-1011740.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
[[ja:&#26908;&#32034;&#12456;&#12531;&#12472;&#12531;&#26368;&#36969;&#21270;]]
 
[[no:Søkemotoroptimalisering]]
In March 2006, KinderStart filed a lawsuit against Google over search engine rankings. KinderStart's website was removed from Google's index prior to the lawsuit, and the amount of traffic to the site dropped by 70%. On March 16, 2007, the [[United States District Court for the Northern District of California]] ([[San Jose, California|San Jose]] Division) dismissed KinderStart's complaint without leave to amend and partially granted Google's motion for [[Federal Rules of Civil Procedure#Title III .E2.80.93 Pleadings and Motions|Rule 11]] sanctions against KinderStart's attorney, requiring him to pay part of Google's legal expenses.<ref>{{cite web|access-date=June 23, 2008|archive-date=May 11, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080511162049/http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2007/03/kinderstart_v_g_2.htm|publisher=blog.ericgoldman.org|title=Technology & Marketing Law Blog: KinderStart v. Google Dismissed—With Sanctions Against KinderStart's Counsel|date=March 20, 2007 |url=http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2007/03/kinderstart_v_g_2.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
[[sv:Sökmotoroptimering]]
|url=http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/03/google_sued_ove.htm
|title=Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Google Sued Over Rankings—KinderStart.com v. Google
|publisher=blog.ericgoldman.org
|access-date=June 23, 2008
|archive-date=June 22, 2008
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080622152019/http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/03/google_sued_ove.htm
|url-status=live
}}</ref>
 
== See also ==
{{div col}}
* [[Competitor backlinking]]
* [[List of search engines]]
* [[Search engine marketing]]
* [[Search neutrality]], the opposite of search manipulation
* [[User intent]]
* [[Website promotion]]
* [[Search engine results page]]
*[[Search engine scraping]]{{div col end}}
<!-- ==============================({{NoMoreLinks}})============================== -->
<!-- DO NOT ADD LINKS TO THIS ARTICLE. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A COLLECTION OF LINKS -->
<!-- If you think that your link might be useful, instead of placing it here, put -->
<!-- it on this article's discussion page first. Links that have not been verified -->
<!-- WILL BE DELETED -->
<!-- ============================================================================= -->
 
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
<!-- This is not the place to add your clever linkspam -->
<!-- Please post an explanation to the Talk Page before adding links here. -->
 
== External links ==
{{Spoken Wikipedia|date=2008-05-20|Search engine optimization.ogg}}
<!--
 
IF YOU DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THIS MESSAGE, YOUR EDIT WILL BE ROLLED BACK WITHOUT WARNING.
 
The External links section in this article is NOT an advertising section. THIS IS NOT A PLACE TO LINK TO YOUR SEO COMPANY. If you want to consider adding an external link, please discuss it within the article's discussion page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Search_engine_optimization. Please review the external link guideline at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:EL before posting in the discussion.
 
-->
* [https://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35769 Webmaster Guidelines] from Google
* [https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/en//insidesearch/howsearchworks/assets/searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf Google Search Quality Evaluators Guidelines (PDF)]
* [https://help.yahoo.com/kb/search/SLN2245.html Webmaster resources] from Yahoo!
* [http://www.bing.com/webmaster/help/webmaster-guidelines-30fba23a Webmaster Guidelines] from [[Microsoft Bing]]
* [https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/13/business/13search.html The Dirty Little Secrets of Search] in [[The New York Times]] (February 12, 2011)
 
<!--
 
IF YOU DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THIS MESSAGE, YOUR EDIT WILL BE REMOVED
 
The External links section in this article is NOT an advertising section. THIS IS NOT A PLACE TO LINK TO YOUR SEO COMPANY. If you want to consider adding an external link, please discuss it on the article's discussion page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Search_engine_optimization. Please review the external link guideline at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:EL before posting in the discussion.
 
-->
{{Search engine optimization}}
 
{{Authority control}}
 
[[Category:Search engine optimization| ]]
[[Category:Digital marketing]]
[[Category:Web analytics]]
[[Category:Internet terminology]]
[[Category:Online advertising]]
[[Category:Promotion and marketing communications]]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization"